Loading…
Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod
Plant responses to herbivore damage vary enormously, but the causes of this variation are not well understood. We examined how both insect feeding style and soil fertility influence the severity of herbivore impacts, by measuring the effects of feeding by a leaf-chewing beetle (Trirhabda sp.), a xyl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 1993-06, Vol.74 (4), p.1117-1128 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5007-eb6c128966a40d0f4d0384517f174513bb7345d9ac4cf166d16c5255b0b727153 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1128 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1117 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Meyer, Gretchen A. Root, Richard B. |
description | Plant responses to herbivore damage vary enormously, but the causes of this variation are not well understood. We examined how both insect feeding style and soil fertility influence the severity of herbivore impacts, by measuring the effects of feeding by a leaf-chewing beetle (Trirhabda sp.), a xylem sap-feeding spittlebug (Philaenus spumarius), and a phloem sap-feeding aphid (Uroleucon caligatum) on growth and reproduction of goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Our goals were to determine (1) whether these three insects differentially affect plant fitness, (2) whether soil fertility affects a plant's ability to compensate for damage, and (3) whether soil fertility and insect feeding style interact in determining herbivory impacts. Plants were grown outdoors in large pots at two levels of soil fertility, and insects were placed on them at a range of densities. Insects fed on the plants for @?3 wk in spring, and then the plants were grown insect free for the rest of the season. We used insect mass gain per plant as the basis for comparing the effects of three insects, since the insects differed greatly in size. Spittlebug feeding reduced plant growth rates 3 times more than beetle feeding; aphid feeding had no detectable effect. The plants grew faster at higher soil fertility, but there was no interaction between insect impact and fertilizer level. Stem heights at the end of the season were increased by fertilizer and not affected by herbivory. Spittlebug feeding, and to a lesser extent aphid feeding, decreased the number of lateral stems, and again there was no interaction with soil fertility. Soil fertility had strong effects on plant sexual and asexual reproduction. Plants at the high level of soil fertility showed a three-fold increase in total seed production, a 5% increase in mean achene mass, almost a two-fold increase in rhizome mass, and increased percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes. Total seed production was reduced by herbivory. The pattern was the same as for plant growth rates; the spittlebug caused the strongest decrease, beetle feeding was second, and aphid feeding caused slight reductions. There was a strong interaction between insect impact and soil fertility. Total seed production was reduced only at the high level of soil fertility for all three insects. Spittlebug and beetle damage also delayed flowering, but only at the high level soil fertility. Rhizome mass, mean achene mass, and percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes were not affecte |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1940481 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16533182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1940481</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1940481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5007-eb6c128966a40d0f4d0384517f174513bb7345d9ac4cf166d16c5255b0b727153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2KFDEURoMo2I7iG0ihMq5K781_ltK0ozDoQmfhKqRSyZimpjIm1Uq_vWm7URDGbC65nJx8fIQ8RXhNGag3aDhwjffICg0zvUEF98kKAGlvpNAPyaNat9AOcr0iHzcxBr_ULsfuWyhD-pFL3tUuzfX32s1jV3OauhjKkqa07Ls8dyXcljzu_JLapb28ztMY5rZ6TB5EN9Xw5DTPyNW7zZf1-_7y08WH9dvL3gsA1YdBeqTaSOk4jBD5CExzgSqiaoMNg2JcjMZ57iNKOaL0ggoxwKCoQsHOyPnR23J834W62JtUfZgmN4cW36IUjKGmDXz-D7jNuzK3bJaiaaVQ4A16cReE1EhONeUH6tWR8iXXWkK0tyXduLK3CPZQvT1V38iXJ5-r3k2xuNmn-gfnWgrDDtnYEfuZprC_y2Y3669oDFOcI6L6K9_WJZf_ZHh2xKLL1l2X9v_V5-bhAEzo5vsFhzmihQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219012204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley Online (Archive)</source><creator>Meyer, Gretchen A. ; Root, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Gretchen A. ; Root, Richard B. ; Giessen Univ. (Germany). Fachbereich Agrarwissenschaften. Inst. fuer Phytopathologie und Angewandte Zoologie ; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY</creatorcontrib><description>Plant responses to herbivore damage vary enormously, but the causes of this variation are not well understood. We examined how both insect feeding style and soil fertility influence the severity of herbivore impacts, by measuring the effects of feeding by a leaf-chewing beetle (Trirhabda sp.), a xylem sap-feeding spittlebug (Philaenus spumarius), and a phloem sap-feeding aphid (Uroleucon caligatum) on growth and reproduction of goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Our goals were to determine (1) whether these three insects differentially affect plant fitness, (2) whether soil fertility affects a plant's ability to compensate for damage, and (3) whether soil fertility and insect feeding style interact in determining herbivory impacts. Plants were grown outdoors in large pots at two levels of soil fertility, and insects were placed on them at a range of densities. Insects fed on the plants for @?3 wk in spring, and then the plants were grown insect free for the rest of the season. We used insect mass gain per plant as the basis for comparing the effects of three insects, since the insects differed greatly in size. Spittlebug feeding reduced plant growth rates 3 times more than beetle feeding; aphid feeding had no detectable effect. The plants grew faster at higher soil fertility, but there was no interaction between insect impact and fertilizer level. Stem heights at the end of the season were increased by fertilizer and not affected by herbivory. Spittlebug feeding, and to a lesser extent aphid feeding, decreased the number of lateral stems, and again there was no interaction with soil fertility. Soil fertility had strong effects on plant sexual and asexual reproduction. Plants at the high level of soil fertility showed a three-fold increase in total seed production, a 5% increase in mean achene mass, almost a two-fold increase in rhizome mass, and increased percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes. Total seed production was reduced by herbivory. The pattern was the same as for plant growth rates; the spittlebug caused the strongest decrease, beetle feeding was second, and aphid feeding caused slight reductions. There was a strong interaction between insect impact and soil fertility. Total seed production was reduced only at the high level of soil fertility for all three insects. Spittlebug and beetle damage also delayed flowering, but only at the high level soil fertility. Rhizome mass, mean achene mass, and percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes were not affected by herbivory. The common assumption that plants are better able to compensate for herbivore damage at higher levels of soil fertility must be reconsidered. This study also suggests that sexual reproduction may be more sensitive to damage than asexual reproduction in perennial plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1940481</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>agentes nocivos ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aphididae ; Beetles ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cercopidae ; Chrysomelidae ; Coleoptera ; comportement alimentaire ; Demecology ; Ecology ; facteur nuisible ; feeding habits ; fertilidad del suelo ; fertilite du sol ; Fertilizers ; Flowers & plants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; habitos alimentarios ; Herbivores ; Homoptera ; Infestation ; injurious factors ; Insecta ; insecte nuisible ; insectos daninos ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; new york ; nueva york ; performance de reproduction ; pest insects ; Philaenus ; philaenus spumarius ; Phytophagous insects ; Plant growth ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; reproductive performance ; reproductividad ; Rhizomes ; Scale insects ; Soil fertility ; solidago ; Solidago altissima ; Trirhabda ; Uroleucon</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1993-06, Vol.74 (4), p.1117-1128</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1993 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jun 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5007-eb6c128966a40d0f4d0384517f174513bb7345d9ac4cf166d16c5255b0b727153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1940481$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1940481$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1413,27911,27912,46036,46460,58225,58458</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4865932$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Gretchen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Root, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giessen Univ. (Germany). Fachbereich Agrarwissenschaften. Inst. fuer Phytopathologie und Angewandte Zoologie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornell University, Ithaca, NY</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Plant responses to herbivore damage vary enormously, but the causes of this variation are not well understood. We examined how both insect feeding style and soil fertility influence the severity of herbivore impacts, by measuring the effects of feeding by a leaf-chewing beetle (Trirhabda sp.), a xylem sap-feeding spittlebug (Philaenus spumarius), and a phloem sap-feeding aphid (Uroleucon caligatum) on growth and reproduction of goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Our goals were to determine (1) whether these three insects differentially affect plant fitness, (2) whether soil fertility affects a plant's ability to compensate for damage, and (3) whether soil fertility and insect feeding style interact in determining herbivory impacts. Plants were grown outdoors in large pots at two levels of soil fertility, and insects were placed on them at a range of densities. Insects fed on the plants for @?3 wk in spring, and then the plants were grown insect free for the rest of the season. We used insect mass gain per plant as the basis for comparing the effects of three insects, since the insects differed greatly in size. Spittlebug feeding reduced plant growth rates 3 times more than beetle feeding; aphid feeding had no detectable effect. The plants grew faster at higher soil fertility, but there was no interaction between insect impact and fertilizer level. Stem heights at the end of the season were increased by fertilizer and not affected by herbivory. Spittlebug feeding, and to a lesser extent aphid feeding, decreased the number of lateral stems, and again there was no interaction with soil fertility. Soil fertility had strong effects on plant sexual and asexual reproduction. Plants at the high level of soil fertility showed a three-fold increase in total seed production, a 5% increase in mean achene mass, almost a two-fold increase in rhizome mass, and increased percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes. Total seed production was reduced by herbivory. The pattern was the same as for plant growth rates; the spittlebug caused the strongest decrease, beetle feeding was second, and aphid feeding caused slight reductions. There was a strong interaction between insect impact and soil fertility. Total seed production was reduced only at the high level of soil fertility for all three insects. Spittlebug and beetle damage also delayed flowering, but only at the high level soil fertility. Rhizome mass, mean achene mass, and percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes were not affected by herbivory. The common assumption that plants are better able to compensate for herbivore damage at higher levels of soil fertility must be reconsidered. This study also suggests that sexual reproduction may be more sensitive to damage than asexual reproduction in perennial plants.</description><subject>agentes nocivos</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cercopidae</subject><subject>Chrysomelidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>comportement alimentaire</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>facteur nuisible</subject><subject>feeding habits</subject><subject>fertilidad del suelo</subject><subject>fertilite du sol</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>habitos alimentarios</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Homoptera</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>injurious factors</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>insecte nuisible</subject><subject>insectos daninos</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>new york</subject><subject>nueva york</subject><subject>performance de reproduction</subject><subject>pest insects</subject><subject>Philaenus</subject><subject>philaenus spumarius</subject><subject>Phytophagous insects</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>reproductive performance</subject><subject>reproductividad</subject><subject>Rhizomes</subject><subject>Scale insects</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>solidago</subject><subject>Solidago altissima</subject><subject>Trirhabda</subject><subject>Uroleucon</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM2KFDEURoMo2I7iG0ihMq5K781_ltK0ozDoQmfhKqRSyZimpjIm1Uq_vWm7URDGbC65nJx8fIQ8RXhNGag3aDhwjffICg0zvUEF98kKAGlvpNAPyaNat9AOcr0iHzcxBr_ULsfuWyhD-pFL3tUuzfX32s1jV3OauhjKkqa07Ls8dyXcljzu_JLapb28ztMY5rZ6TB5EN9Xw5DTPyNW7zZf1-_7y08WH9dvL3gsA1YdBeqTaSOk4jBD5CExzgSqiaoMNg2JcjMZ57iNKOaL0ggoxwKCoQsHOyPnR23J834W62JtUfZgmN4cW36IUjKGmDXz-D7jNuzK3bJaiaaVQ4A16cReE1EhONeUH6tWR8iXXWkK0tyXduLK3CPZQvT1V38iXJ5-r3k2xuNmn-gfnWgrDDtnYEfuZprC_y2Y3669oDFOcI6L6K9_WJZf_ZHh2xKLL1l2X9v_V5-bhAEzo5vsFhzmihQ</recordid><startdate>199306</startdate><enddate>199306</enddate><creator>Meyer, Gretchen A.</creator><creator>Root, Richard B.</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199306</creationdate><title>Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod</title><author>Meyer, Gretchen A. ; Root, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5007-eb6c128966a40d0f4d0384517f174513bb7345d9ac4cf166d16c5255b0b727153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>agentes nocivos</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cercopidae</topic><topic>Chrysomelidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>comportement alimentaire</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>facteur nuisible</topic><topic>feeding habits</topic><topic>fertilidad del suelo</topic><topic>fertilite du sol</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>habitos alimentarios</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Homoptera</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>injurious factors</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>insecte nuisible</topic><topic>insectos daninos</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>new york</topic><topic>nueva york</topic><topic>performance de reproduction</topic><topic>pest insects</topic><topic>Philaenus</topic><topic>philaenus spumarius</topic><topic>Phytophagous insects</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>reproductive performance</topic><topic>reproductividad</topic><topic>Rhizomes</topic><topic>Scale insects</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>solidago</topic><topic>Solidago altissima</topic><topic>Trirhabda</topic><topic>Uroleucon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Gretchen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Root, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giessen Univ. (Germany). Fachbereich Agrarwissenschaften. Inst. fuer Phytopathologie und Angewandte Zoologie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornell University, Ithaca, NY</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, Gretchen A.</au><au>Root, Richard B.</au><aucorp>Giessen Univ. (Germany). Fachbereich Agrarwissenschaften. Inst. fuer Phytopathologie und Angewandte Zoologie</aucorp><aucorp>Cornell University, Ithaca, NY</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1993-06</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1117</spage><epage>1128</epage><pages>1117-1128</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Plant responses to herbivore damage vary enormously, but the causes of this variation are not well understood. We examined how both insect feeding style and soil fertility influence the severity of herbivore impacts, by measuring the effects of feeding by a leaf-chewing beetle (Trirhabda sp.), a xylem sap-feeding spittlebug (Philaenus spumarius), and a phloem sap-feeding aphid (Uroleucon caligatum) on growth and reproduction of goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Our goals were to determine (1) whether these three insects differentially affect plant fitness, (2) whether soil fertility affects a plant's ability to compensate for damage, and (3) whether soil fertility and insect feeding style interact in determining herbivory impacts. Plants were grown outdoors in large pots at two levels of soil fertility, and insects were placed on them at a range of densities. Insects fed on the plants for @?3 wk in spring, and then the plants were grown insect free for the rest of the season. We used insect mass gain per plant as the basis for comparing the effects of three insects, since the insects differed greatly in size. Spittlebug feeding reduced plant growth rates 3 times more than beetle feeding; aphid feeding had no detectable effect. The plants grew faster at higher soil fertility, but there was no interaction between insect impact and fertilizer level. Stem heights at the end of the season were increased by fertilizer and not affected by herbivory. Spittlebug feeding, and to a lesser extent aphid feeding, decreased the number of lateral stems, and again there was no interaction with soil fertility. Soil fertility had strong effects on plant sexual and asexual reproduction. Plants at the high level of soil fertility showed a three-fold increase in total seed production, a 5% increase in mean achene mass, almost a two-fold increase in rhizome mass, and increased percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes. Total seed production was reduced by herbivory. The pattern was the same as for plant growth rates; the spittlebug caused the strongest decrease, beetle feeding was second, and aphid feeding caused slight reductions. There was a strong interaction between insect impact and soil fertility. Total seed production was reduced only at the high level of soil fertility for all three insects. Spittlebug and beetle damage also delayed flowering, but only at the high level soil fertility. Rhizome mass, mean achene mass, and percent nitrogen in seeds and rhizomes were not affected by herbivory. The common assumption that plants are better able to compensate for herbivore damage at higher levels of soil fertility must be reconsidered. This study also suggests that sexual reproduction may be more sensitive to damage than asexual reproduction in perennial plants.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1940481</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 1993-06, Vol.74 (4), p.1117-1128 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16533182 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley Online (Archive) |
subjects | agentes nocivos Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Aphididae Beetles Biological and medical sciences Cercopidae Chrysomelidae Coleoptera comportement alimentaire Demecology Ecology facteur nuisible feeding habits fertilidad del suelo fertilite du sol Fertilizers Flowers & plants Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology habitos alimentarios Herbivores Homoptera Infestation injurious factors Insecta insecte nuisible insectos daninos Insects Invertebrates new york nueva york performance de reproduction pest insects Philaenus philaenus spumarius Phytophagous insects Plant growth Plant reproduction Plants Plants and fungi reproductive performance reproductividad Rhizomes Scale insects Soil fertility solidago Solidago altissima Trirhabda Uroleucon |
title | Effects of herbivorous insects and soil fertility on reproduction of goldenrod |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20herbivorous%20insects%20and%20soil%20fertility%20on%20reproduction%20of%20goldenrod&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Meyer,%20Gretchen%20A.&rft.aucorp=Giessen%20Univ.%20(Germany).%20Fachbereich%20Agrarwissenschaften.%20Inst.%20fuer%20Phytopathologie%20und%20Angewandte%20Zoologie&rft.date=1993-06&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1117&rft.epage=1128&rft.pages=1117-1128&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1940481&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1940481%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5007-eb6c128966a40d0f4d0384517f174513bb7345d9ac4cf166d16c5255b0b727153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219012204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1940481&rfr_iscdi=true |