Non‐market valuation: usage and impacts in environmental policy and management in Australia

An extensive literature exists on environmental nonmarket valuation research. It appears that results from these studies should be useful inputs to decision‐making about environmental policy or management. Here, we investigate the extent to which this occurs in practice in Australian environmental m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2015-01, Vol.59 (1), p.1-15
Main Authors: Rogers, Abbie A., Kragt, Marit E., Gibson, Fiona L., Burton, Michael P., Petersen, Elizabeth H., Pannell, David J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Australia
Decision making
Environmental economics
Environmental management
Environmental policy
Interviews
Management
Management decisions
nonmarket valuation
Perception
Studies
Valuation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An extensive literature exists on environmental nonmarket valuation research. It appears that results from these studies should be useful inputs to decision‐making about environmental policy or management. Here, we investigate the extent to which this occurs in practice in Australian environmental management bodies. Nonmarket valuation experts were surveyed about their studies that they believed to have influenced policy. Then, decision‐makers in environmental bodies were interviewed about the level of influence nonmarket valuation has had on their decisions. We find that researchers' perceptions of the influence that nonmarket valuation has on decision‐making are overly optimistic. Interviews with decision‐makers suggest that nonmarket valuation is little used in decision‐making. Indeed, the majority of them are unfamiliar with nonmarket valuation techniques. Nevertheless, once the concept was explained to them, many decision‐makers believed it could benefit environmental policy. Researchers' perceptions of the reasons for low usage of nonmarket valuation are largely inaccurate. We suggest a range of strategies that economists can use to promote the use of nonmarket valuation in environmental policy and management decisions, including ways to improve communication and engagement with decision‐makers, and strategies to increase the capacity for decision‐makers to use nonmarket valuation results.
ISSN:1364-985X
1467-8489
DOI:10.1111/1467-8489.12031