Loading…
Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements
Objectives To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect. Methods Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were perfo...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1283-1289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143 |
container_end_page | 1289 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1283 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Ferraioli, Giovanna Tinelli, Carmine Lissandrin, Raffaella Zicchetti, Mabel Bernuzzi, Stefano Salvaneschi, Laura Filice, Carlo |
description | Objectives
To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect.
Methods
Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility.
Results
A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole.
Conclusions
The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements.
Key Points
•
Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator.
•
To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required.
•
A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account.
•
SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654685502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1525766918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoocDD8AGWWLDJjC-xQ47VHGTKrGha8vNGZ-mSpzgSVrlBXhuHE5BCAmx8mK-_xvbP2PPBbwWAPYNASgFFQhdKaGhWh-wndBKVgKcfsh20ChX2abRZ-wJ0Q0ANELbx-xM6lor3dgd-37ZzznQuKQDn8YuzZyuMWR-F26RYx9oHo85TNcrD0RINGBBxsj77hYzDyVFU4-YOM1djKkQbznGiO1Pqqi71KUjHxPPOGGYw1XXd_O6DQcMtGTcjPSUPYqhJ3x2f-7Z5Yf3X88_VRdfPn4-f3dRtdqKuYqNNsIZC8rVzgqnlGlRWOmwcRZ0MPFgrUQrai01qhikPhhAAa3ApnyR2rNXJ--Ux28L0uyHjlrs-5BwXMiL2ujaGQPy_6iRxtZ1U26xZy__Qm_GJafykI3SDkDKbbc4UW0eiTJGP-VuCHn1AvzWpz_16UuffuvTryXz4t68XA14-J34VWAB5AmgMkpHzH-s_qf1B50rq74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524800224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ferraioli, Giovanna ; Tinelli, Carmine ; Lissandrin, Raffaella ; Zicchetti, Mabel ; Bernuzzi, Stefano ; Salvaneschi, Laura ; Filice, Carlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferraioli, Giovanna ; Tinelli, Carmine ; Lissandrin, Raffaella ; Zicchetti, Mabel ; Bernuzzi, Stefano ; Salvaneschi, Laura ; Filice, Carlo ; Elastography Study Group ; on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect.
Methods
Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility.
Results
A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole.
Conclusions
The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements.
Key Points
•
Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator.
•
To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required.
•
A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account.
•
SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24643497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Learning curves ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver diseases ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spleen ; Spleen - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1283-1289</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferraioli, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinelli, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissandrin, Raffaella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zicchetti, Mabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernuzzi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaneschi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filice, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect.
Methods
Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility.
Results
A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole.
Conclusions
The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements.
Key Points
•
Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator.
•
To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required.
•
A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account.
•
SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Learning curves</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spleen</subject><subject>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoocDD8AGWWLDJjC-xQ47VHGTKrGha8vNGZ-mSpzgSVrlBXhuHE5BCAmx8mK-_xvbP2PPBbwWAPYNASgFFQhdKaGhWh-wndBKVgKcfsh20ChX2abRZ-wJ0Q0ANELbx-xM6lor3dgd-37ZzznQuKQDn8YuzZyuMWR-F26RYx9oHo85TNcrD0RINGBBxsj77hYzDyVFU4-YOM1djKkQbznGiO1Pqqi71KUjHxPPOGGYw1XXd_O6DQcMtGTcjPSUPYqhJ3x2f-7Z5Yf3X88_VRdfPn4-f3dRtdqKuYqNNsIZC8rVzgqnlGlRWOmwcRZ0MPFgrUQrai01qhikPhhAAa3ApnyR2rNXJ--Ux28L0uyHjlrs-5BwXMiL2ujaGQPy_6iRxtZ1U26xZy__Qm_GJafykI3SDkDKbbc4UW0eiTJGP-VuCHn1AvzWpz_16UuffuvTryXz4t68XA14-J34VWAB5AmgMkpHzH-s_qf1B50rq74</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Ferraioli, Giovanna</creator><creator>Tinelli, Carmine</creator><creator>Lissandrin, Raffaella</creator><creator>Zicchetti, Mabel</creator><creator>Bernuzzi, Stefano</creator><creator>Salvaneschi, Laura</creator><creator>Filice, Carlo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</title><author>Ferraioli, Giovanna ; Tinelli, Carmine ; Lissandrin, Raffaella ; Zicchetti, Mabel ; Bernuzzi, Stefano ; Salvaneschi, Laura ; Filice, Carlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Learning curves</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spleen</topic><topic>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferraioli, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinelli, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissandrin, Raffaella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zicchetti, Mabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernuzzi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaneschi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filice, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferraioli, Giovanna</au><au>Tinelli, Carmine</au><au>Lissandrin, Raffaella</au><au>Zicchetti, Mabel</au><au>Bernuzzi, Stefano</au><au>Salvaneschi, Laura</au><au>Filice, Carlo</au><aucorp>Elastography Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1283</spage><epage>1289</epage><pages>1283-1289</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect.
Methods
Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility.
Results
A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole.
Conclusions
The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements.
Key Points
•
Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator.
•
To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required.
•
A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account.
•
SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24643497</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1283-1289 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654685502 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Biopsy Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnostic Radiology Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics & numerical data Female Healthy Volunteers Humans Hypertension Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Learning curves Liver - diagnostic imaging Liver diseases Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neuroradiology Observer Variation Prospective Studies Radiology Reproducibility Reproducibility of Results Spleen Spleen - diagnostic imaging Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound Young Adult |
title | Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A31%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20point%20shear%20wave%20elastography%20assessment%20of%20liver%20and%20spleen%20stiffness:%20effect%20of%20training%20on%20repeatability%20of%20measurements&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Ferraioli,%20Giovanna&rft.aucorp=Elastography%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1283&rft.epage=1289&rft.pages=1283-1289&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1525766918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524800224&rft_id=info:pmid/24643497&rfr_iscdi=true |