Loading…

Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements

Objectives To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect. Methods Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were perfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European radiology 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1283-1289
Main Authors: Ferraioli, Giovanna, Tinelli, Carmine, Lissandrin, Raffaella, Zicchetti, Mabel, Bernuzzi, Stefano, Salvaneschi, Laura, Filice, Carlo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143
container_end_page 1289
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1283
container_title European radiology
container_volume 24
creator Ferraioli, Giovanna
Tinelli, Carmine
Lissandrin, Raffaella
Zicchetti, Mabel
Bernuzzi, Stefano
Salvaneschi, Laura
Filice, Carlo
description Objectives To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect. Methods Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility. Results A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole. Conclusions The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements. Key Points • Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator. • To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required. • A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account. • SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654685502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1525766918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoocDD8AGWWLDJjC-xQ47VHGTKrGha8vNGZ-mSpzgSVrlBXhuHE5BCAmx8mK-_xvbP2PPBbwWAPYNASgFFQhdKaGhWh-wndBKVgKcfsh20ChX2abRZ-wJ0Q0ANELbx-xM6lor3dgd-37ZzznQuKQDn8YuzZyuMWR-F26RYx9oHo85TNcrD0RINGBBxsj77hYzDyVFU4-YOM1djKkQbznGiO1Pqqi71KUjHxPPOGGYw1XXd_O6DQcMtGTcjPSUPYqhJ3x2f-7Z5Yf3X88_VRdfPn4-f3dRtdqKuYqNNsIZC8rVzgqnlGlRWOmwcRZ0MPFgrUQrai01qhikPhhAAa3ApnyR2rNXJ--Ux28L0uyHjlrs-5BwXMiL2ujaGQPy_6iRxtZ1U26xZy__Qm_GJafykI3SDkDKbbc4UW0eiTJGP-VuCHn1AvzWpz_16UuffuvTryXz4t68XA14-J34VWAB5AmgMkpHzH-s_qf1B50rq74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524800224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ferraioli, Giovanna ; Tinelli, Carmine ; Lissandrin, Raffaella ; Zicchetti, Mabel ; Bernuzzi, Stefano ; Salvaneschi, Laura ; Filice, Carlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferraioli, Giovanna ; Tinelli, Carmine ; Lissandrin, Raffaella ; Zicchetti, Mabel ; Bernuzzi, Stefano ; Salvaneschi, Laura ; Filice, Carlo ; Elastography Study Group ; on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect. Methods Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility. Results A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole. Conclusions The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements. Key Points • Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator. • To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required. • A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account. • SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24643497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Learning curves ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver diseases ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spleen ; Spleen - diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1283-1289</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferraioli, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinelli, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissandrin, Raffaella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zicchetti, Mabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernuzzi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaneschi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filice, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect. Methods Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility. Results A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole. Conclusions The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements. Key Points • Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator. • To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required. • A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account. • SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Learning curves</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Spleen</subject><subject>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoocDD8AGWWLDJjC-xQ47VHGTKrGha8vNGZ-mSpzgSVrlBXhuHE5BCAmx8mK-_xvbP2PPBbwWAPYNASgFFQhdKaGhWh-wndBKVgKcfsh20ChX2abRZ-wJ0Q0ANELbx-xM6lor3dgd-37ZzznQuKQDn8YuzZyuMWR-F26RYx9oHo85TNcrD0RINGBBxsj77hYzDyVFU4-YOM1djKkQbznGiO1Pqqi71KUjHxPPOGGYw1XXd_O6DQcMtGTcjPSUPYqhJ3x2f-7Z5Yf3X88_VRdfPn4-f3dRtdqKuYqNNsIZC8rVzgqnlGlRWOmwcRZ0MPFgrUQrai01qhikPhhAAa3ApnyR2rNXJ--Ux28L0uyHjlrs-5BwXMiL2ujaGQPy_6iRxtZ1U26xZy__Qm_GJafykI3SDkDKbbc4UW0eiTJGP-VuCHn1AvzWpz_16UuffuvTryXz4t68XA14-J34VWAB5AmgMkpHzH-s_qf1B50rq74</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Ferraioli, Giovanna</creator><creator>Tinelli, Carmine</creator><creator>Lissandrin, Raffaella</creator><creator>Zicchetti, Mabel</creator><creator>Bernuzzi, Stefano</creator><creator>Salvaneschi, Laura</creator><creator>Filice, Carlo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</title><author>Ferraioli, Giovanna ; Tinelli, Carmine ; Lissandrin, Raffaella ; Zicchetti, Mabel ; Bernuzzi, Stefano ; Salvaneschi, Laura ; Filice, Carlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Learning curves</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Spleen</topic><topic>Spleen - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferraioli, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinelli, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissandrin, Raffaella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zicchetti, Mabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernuzzi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvaneschi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filice, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferraioli, Giovanna</au><au>Tinelli, Carmine</au><au>Lissandrin, Raffaella</au><au>Zicchetti, Mabel</au><au>Bernuzzi, Stefano</au><au>Salvaneschi, Laura</au><au>Filice, Carlo</au><aucorp>Elastography Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the Elastography Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1283</spage><epage>1289</epage><pages>1283-1289</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate reproducibility of measurements of spleen stiffness (SS) and liver stiffness (LS) at several sites by using point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and to investigate any training effect. Methods Healthy volunteers were consecutively enrolled. Measurements of SS and LS were performed by an expert (observer 1) and a novice (observer 2) at three different sites of liver and spleen. To assess the effect of training the study was conducted in two periods (period 1 and period 2). Concordance correlation coefficient was used to assess intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility. Results A total of 92 subjects (67 men and 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Both intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were higher for the liver than for the spleen. Overall, the highest intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were obtained for the assessment of LS through intercostal space, and for measurements at this site there was a significantly better performance of observer 2 after the training period. For both observers, training improved the repeatability of SS measurements at all sites. A good intra-observer agreement was obtained only for measurements at the spleen lower pole. Conclusions The results of this study show that a learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account both for SS and LS measurements. Key Points • Reproducibility of SS measurements depends on the expertise of the operator. • To achieve good reproducibility between measurements a training period is required. • A learning curve in pSWE acquisition should be taken into account. • SS measurements are less reproducible than LS measurements.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24643497</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1283-1289
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1654685502
source Springer Nature
subjects Adult
Biopsy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnostic Radiology
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - standards
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - statistics & numerical data
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Hypertension
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Learning curves
Liver - diagnostic imaging
Liver diseases
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neuroradiology
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Radiology
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Spleen
Spleen - diagnostic imaging
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Young Adult
title Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A31%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20point%20shear%20wave%20elastography%20assessment%20of%20liver%20and%20spleen%20stiffness:%20effect%20of%20training%20on%20repeatability%20of%20measurements&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Ferraioli,%20Giovanna&rft.aucorp=Elastography%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1283&rft.epage=1289&rft.pages=1283-1289&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-014-3140-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1525766918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f945185703868718335ce1728e98704a5fd772e716424e3fa24d50e10c1e93143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524800224&rft_id=info:pmid/24643497&rfr_iscdi=true