Loading…
Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates
Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 1998-02, Vol.60 (2), p.202-208 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 208 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 202 |
container_title | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | MATTICE, J. D PARK, S. K LAVY, T. L |
description | Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s001289900611 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16550411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464511529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cGL1TAQBvAgyvp29ehRCCjipZpp0zQ5ykNXYUEPei7z0mTJ2iY1k6r735vHPhb04CmH-fExk4-xZyDegBDDWxICWm2MEArgAduB7NpGaCEesp2ooJFawWN2TnRTZa_b9oydGTkIM5gdu_6Siosl4MxXJAo_HXfLmrLje9B8CvSdu98loy0hRe5T5hhxvqVAPHn-C4vLnHBZZ0fcplgwxBCvuQ_R1cBcgt3miugJe-RxJvf09F6wbx_ef91_bK4-X37av7tqrBSmNFqjbRFVveWA0iuQKJWVVkF3MDDBwfd-GkBpJ6fW2F4ZZ6xTymmDWnW-u2Cv7nLXnH5sjsq4BLJunjG6tNEIqu-FBKjw9f-hVLIH6FtT6Yt_6E3acv2Go-rA6E4Px8DmTtmciLLz45rDgvl2BDEemxr_aqr656fU7bC46V6fqqnzl6c5ksXZZ4w20D1r62qy190fIQOacQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431983871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>MATTICE, J. D ; PARK, S. K ; LAVY, T. L</creator><creatorcontrib>MATTICE, J. D ; PARK, S. K ; LAVY, T. L</creatorcontrib><description>Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s001289900611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9470979</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BECTA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry ; Natural water pollution ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pollution ; Polystyrenes - chemistry ; Resins, Synthetic - chemistry ; Water - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water sampling ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 1998-02, Vol.60 (2), p.202-208</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2152458$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9470979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MATTICE, J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARK, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVY, T. L</creatorcontrib><title>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</title><title>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polystyrenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Resins, Synthetic - chemistry</subject><subject>Water - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0007-4861</issn><issn>1432-0800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90cGL1TAQBvAgyvp29ehRCCjipZpp0zQ5ykNXYUEPei7z0mTJ2iY1k6r735vHPhb04CmH-fExk4-xZyDegBDDWxICWm2MEArgAduB7NpGaCEesp2ooJFawWN2TnRTZa_b9oydGTkIM5gdu_6Siosl4MxXJAo_HXfLmrLje9B8CvSdu98loy0hRe5T5hhxvqVAPHn-C4vLnHBZZ0fcplgwxBCvuQ_R1cBcgt3miugJe-RxJvf09F6wbx_ef91_bK4-X37av7tqrBSmNFqjbRFVveWA0iuQKJWVVkF3MDDBwfd-GkBpJ6fW2F4ZZ6xTymmDWnW-u2Cv7nLXnH5sjsq4BLJunjG6tNEIqu-FBKjw9f-hVLIH6FtT6Yt_6E3acv2Go-rA6E4Px8DmTtmciLLz45rDgvl2BDEemxr_aqr656fU7bC46V6fqqnzl6c5ksXZZ4w20D1r62qy190fIQOacQ</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>MATTICE, J. D</creator><creator>PARK, S. K</creator><creator>LAVY, T. L</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</title><author>MATTICE, J. D ; PARK, S. K ; LAVY, T. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polystyrenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Resins, Synthetic - chemistry</topic><topic>Water - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MATTICE, J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARK, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVY, T. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MATTICE, J. D</au><au>PARK, S. K</au><au>LAVY, T. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>202-208</pages><issn>0007-4861</issn><eissn>1432-0800</eissn><coden>BECTA6</coden><abstract>Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>9470979</pmid><doi>10.1007/s001289900611</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-4861 |
ispartof | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 1998-02, Vol.60 (2), p.202-208 |
issn | 0007-4861 1432-0800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16550411 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Analysis methods Applied sciences Environmental Monitoring - methods Exact sciences and technology Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry Natural water pollution Pesticides - analysis Pollution Polystyrenes - chemistry Resins, Synthetic - chemistry Water - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water sampling Water treatment and pollution |
title | Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A08%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20passive%20empore%20C18%20disk%20extraction%20for%20analysis%20of%20water%20samples%20containing%20fine%20particulates&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=MATTICE,%20J.%20D&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=202-208&rft.issn=0007-4861&rft.eissn=1432-0800&rft.coden=BECTA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s001289900611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464511529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431983871&rft_id=info:pmid/9470979&rfr_iscdi=true |