Loading…

Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates

Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 1998-02, Vol.60 (2), p.202-208
Main Authors: MATTICE, J. D, PARK, S. K, LAVY, T. L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3
cites
container_end_page 208
container_issue 2
container_start_page 202
container_title Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology
container_volume 60
creator MATTICE, J. D
PARK, S. K
LAVY, T. L
description Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s001289900611
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16550411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464511529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cGL1TAQBvAgyvp29ehRCCjipZpp0zQ5ykNXYUEPei7z0mTJ2iY1k6r735vHPhb04CmH-fExk4-xZyDegBDDWxICWm2MEArgAduB7NpGaCEesp2ooJFawWN2TnRTZa_b9oydGTkIM5gdu_6Siosl4MxXJAo_HXfLmrLje9B8CvSdu98loy0hRe5T5hhxvqVAPHn-C4vLnHBZZ0fcplgwxBCvuQ_R1cBcgt3miugJe-RxJvf09F6wbx_ef91_bK4-X37av7tqrBSmNFqjbRFVveWA0iuQKJWVVkF3MDDBwfd-GkBpJ6fW2F4ZZ6xTymmDWnW-u2Cv7nLXnH5sjsq4BLJunjG6tNEIqu-FBKjw9f-hVLIH6FtT6Yt_6E3acv2Go-rA6E4Px8DmTtmciLLz45rDgvl2BDEemxr_aqr656fU7bC46V6fqqnzl6c5ksXZZ4w20D1r62qy190fIQOacQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431983871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>MATTICE, J. D ; PARK, S. K ; LAVY, T. L</creator><creatorcontrib>MATTICE, J. D ; PARK, S. K ; LAVY, T. L</creatorcontrib><description>Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s001289900611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9470979</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BECTA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry ; Natural water pollution ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pollution ; Polystyrenes - chemistry ; Resins, Synthetic - chemistry ; Water - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water sampling ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 1998-02, Vol.60 (2), p.202-208</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2152458$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9470979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MATTICE, J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARK, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVY, T. L</creatorcontrib><title>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</title><title>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polystyrenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Resins, Synthetic - chemistry</subject><subject>Water - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0007-4861</issn><issn>1432-0800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90cGL1TAQBvAgyvp29ehRCCjipZpp0zQ5ykNXYUEPei7z0mTJ2iY1k6r735vHPhb04CmH-fExk4-xZyDegBDDWxICWm2MEArgAduB7NpGaCEesp2ooJFawWN2TnRTZa_b9oydGTkIM5gdu_6Siosl4MxXJAo_HXfLmrLje9B8CvSdu98loy0hRe5T5hhxvqVAPHn-C4vLnHBZZ0fcplgwxBCvuQ_R1cBcgt3miugJe-RxJvf09F6wbx_ef91_bK4-X37av7tqrBSmNFqjbRFVveWA0iuQKJWVVkF3MDDBwfd-GkBpJ6fW2F4ZZ6xTymmDWnW-u2Cv7nLXnH5sjsq4BLJunjG6tNEIqu-FBKjw9f-hVLIH6FtT6Yt_6E3acv2Go-rA6E4Px8DmTtmciLLz45rDgvl2BDEemxr_aqr656fU7bC46V6fqqnzl6c5ksXZZ4w20D1r62qy190fIQOacQ</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>MATTICE, J. D</creator><creator>PARK, S. K</creator><creator>LAVY, T. L</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</title><author>MATTICE, J. D ; PARK, S. K ; LAVY, T. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polystyrenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Resins, Synthetic - chemistry</topic><topic>Water - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MATTICE, J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARK, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVY, T. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MATTICE, J. D</au><au>PARK, S. K</au><au>LAVY, T. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>202-208</pages><issn>0007-4861</issn><eissn>1432-0800</eissn><coden>BECTA6</coden><abstract>Although the conventional methodology works well for extracting and concentrating organic chemicals from clean water, actual water samples taken in the field are often more difficult to filter because they contain fine particulates that clog the pores in the filter disk. A possible way to reduce the time necessary for extraction of these types of samples would be to passively extract the sample by shaking the water and disk together rather than filtering the water through the disk. If satisfactory recovery results can be obtained, then the problem of having the disks clogged with the fine particulates can be avoided. This approach has been tried by Reagan and Vo (1994) using a 90 mm Empore Disk and EPA Method 608 pesticides. They emphasized that process variables for their procedure had not been optimized, but average recoveries were within 75-80% of recoveries using liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Since our laboratory commonly encounters water samples that are difficult to filter, we investigated using Empore disks to passively extract nine pesticides from water. We particularly wanted to investigate the effect on extraction efficiency of different shaking speeds, different shaking times, and different disk areas and the relative importance of these variables.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>9470979</pmid><doi>10.1007/s001289900611</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-4861
ispartof Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 1998-02, Vol.60 (2), p.202-208
issn 0007-4861
1432-0800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16550411
source Springer Nature
subjects Analysis methods
Applied sciences
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Exact sciences and technology
Ion Exchange Resins - chemistry
Natural water pollution
Pesticides - analysis
Pollution
Polystyrenes - chemistry
Resins, Synthetic - chemistry
Water - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water sampling
Water treatment and pollution
title Potential passive empore C18 disk extraction for analysis of water samples containing fine particulates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A08%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20passive%20empore%20C18%20disk%20extraction%20for%20analysis%20of%20water%20samples%20containing%20fine%20particulates&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=MATTICE,%20J.%20D&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=202-208&rft.issn=0007-4861&rft.eissn=1432-0800&rft.coden=BECTA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s001289900611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464511529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-88ac2aa6061ba4f614a46c4c613b91d1bf5fd7168e4d29c569e9ce66e89a863f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431983871&rft_id=info:pmid/9470979&rfr_iscdi=true