Using active canopy sensors and chlorophyll meters to estimate grapevine nitrogen status and productivity

Effects of nitrogen (Ν) and water supply on grapevine leaf transmittance and canopy reflectance were studied over 2 years (2009–2010) in two vineyards planted with cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Xinomavro ( Vitis vinifera L.) located in northern Greece. Three N (0, 60 and 120 kg ha −1 ) and two irrigat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Precision agriculture 2015-02, Vol.16 (1), p.77-98
Main Authors: Taskos, D. G., Koundouras, S., Stamatiadis, S., Zioziou, E., Nikolaou, N., Karakioulakis, K., Theodorou, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agriculture
Atmospheric Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Canopies
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Chlorophyll
Computer Science
Crop science
Crops
Evapotranspiration
Irrigation
Laboratories
Leaves
Life Sciences
Microclimate
Nitrogen
Phenols
Physics
Precision farming
Productivity
Remote sensing
Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry
Seasons
Sensors
Soil Science & Conservation
Statistics for Engineering
Studies
Transmittance
Variables
Vegetation
Vineyards
Vitaceae
Vitis vinifera
Water supply
Wineries & vineyards
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Precision agriculture
container_volume 16
creator Taskos, D. G.
Koundouras, S.
Stamatiadis, S.
Zioziou, E.
Nikolaou, N.
Karakioulakis, K.
Theodorou, N.
description Effects of nitrogen (Ν) and water supply on grapevine leaf transmittance and canopy reflectance were studied over 2 years (2009–2010) in two vineyards planted with cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Xinomavro ( Vitis vinifera L.) located in northern Greece. Three N (0, 60 and 120 kg ha −1 ) and two irrigation (irrigated at 70 % of crop evapotranspiration and non-irrigated) treatments were managed in triplicate in randomized blocks. Measurements with two transmittance-based chlorophyll meters (CM: SPAD-502 and CCM-200) and two active canopy sensors (Crop Circle ACS-210; amber band and Crop Circle ACS-430; red and red edge bands) were conducted on four and two growth stages, respectively. Fertilization increased leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations, as well as CM readings and vegetation indices. The CCM and SPAD values did not vary across growth stages and better estimated leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations in Cabernet Sauvignon than in Xinomavro. The SPAD readings provided better predictions of leaf N concentration. The vegetation indices of the ACS-430 sensor correlated with leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations and dormant wood in Cabernet Sauvignon; the red edge-based indices were generally more efficient than the red-based indices. Consistent relationships were observed for all ACS-430 indices with yield and for red edge-based indices with total phenols early in the season for both vineyards. The correlation between ACS-210 sensor indices and vine properties was low. These results showed that the two technologies examined could provide information on grapevine performance early in the season but have limitations that may restrict their use in vineyards because the acquired relationships were not consistent across vineyards and instruments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11119-014-9363-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655741653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1655741653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1qxCAUhaW00Om0D9Cd0E03aTVqjMsy9A8GuumsxRgn45DRVM1A3r4O6aIU6kIvcr5z7z0A3GL0gBHijxHnIwqEaSFIRYr6DCww46TAFa7Pc01qVpQlqy7BVYx7hDJFywWwm2hdB5VO9migVs4PE4zGRR8iVK6Fetf74Ifd1PfwYJLJ38lDE5M9qGRgF9RgjtYZ6GwKvjMOxqTSOMND8O14srZpugYXW9VHc_PzLsHm5flz9VasP17fV0_rQhMqUsG3hijBaIORMHkVQRte0ppzRJgWdVW3pUICVZwIIhrWUk5bzbEmjUCCtowswf3sm5t_jXlQebBRm75XzvgxSlwxxmm-SZbe_ZHu_Rhcni6rKGOEn_osAZ5VOvgYg9nKIeTlwyQxkqfw5Ry-zOHLU_iyzkw5MzFrXWfCL-d_oW8-HYd4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645537067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using active canopy sensors and chlorophyll meters to estimate grapevine nitrogen status and productivity</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Taskos, D. G. ; Koundouras, S. ; Stamatiadis, S. ; Zioziou, E. ; Nikolaou, N. ; Karakioulakis, K. ; Theodorou, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taskos, D. G. ; Koundouras, S. ; Stamatiadis, S. ; Zioziou, E. ; Nikolaou, N. ; Karakioulakis, K. ; Theodorou, N.</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of nitrogen (Ν) and water supply on grapevine leaf transmittance and canopy reflectance were studied over 2 years (2009–2010) in two vineyards planted with cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Xinomavro ( Vitis vinifera L.) located in northern Greece. Three N (0, 60 and 120 kg ha −1 ) and two irrigation (irrigated at 70 % of crop evapotranspiration and non-irrigated) treatments were managed in triplicate in randomized blocks. Measurements with two transmittance-based chlorophyll meters (CM: SPAD-502 and CCM-200) and two active canopy sensors (Crop Circle ACS-210; amber band and Crop Circle ACS-430; red and red edge bands) were conducted on four and two growth stages, respectively. Fertilization increased leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations, as well as CM readings and vegetation indices. The CCM and SPAD values did not vary across growth stages and better estimated leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations in Cabernet Sauvignon than in Xinomavro. The SPAD readings provided better predictions of leaf N concentration. The vegetation indices of the ACS-430 sensor correlated with leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations and dormant wood in Cabernet Sauvignon; the red edge-based indices were generally more efficient than the red-based indices. Consistent relationships were observed for all ACS-430 indices with yield and for red edge-based indices with total phenols early in the season for both vineyards. The correlation between ACS-210 sensor indices and vine properties was low. These results showed that the two technologies examined could provide information on grapevine performance early in the season but have limitations that may restrict their use in vineyards because the acquired relationships were not consistent across vineyards and instruments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-2256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11119-014-9363-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Canopies ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Chlorophyll ; Computer Science ; Crop science ; Crops ; Evapotranspiration ; Irrigation ; Laboratories ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Microclimate ; Nitrogen ; Phenols ; Physics ; Precision farming ; Productivity ; Remote sensing ; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ; Seasons ; Sensors ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Statistics for Engineering ; Studies ; Transmittance ; Variables ; Vegetation ; Vineyards ; Vitaceae ; Vitis vinifera ; Water supply ; Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><ispartof>Precision agriculture, 2015-02, Vol.16 (1), p.77-98</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645537067/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645537067?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taskos, D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koundouras, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatiadis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zioziou, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolaou, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakioulakis, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Using active canopy sensors and chlorophyll meters to estimate grapevine nitrogen status and productivity</title><title>Precision agriculture</title><addtitle>Precision Agric</addtitle><description>Effects of nitrogen (Ν) and water supply on grapevine leaf transmittance and canopy reflectance were studied over 2 years (2009–2010) in two vineyards planted with cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Xinomavro ( Vitis vinifera L.) located in northern Greece. Three N (0, 60 and 120 kg ha −1 ) and two irrigation (irrigated at 70 % of crop evapotranspiration and non-irrigated) treatments were managed in triplicate in randomized blocks. Measurements with two transmittance-based chlorophyll meters (CM: SPAD-502 and CCM-200) and two active canopy sensors (Crop Circle ACS-210; amber band and Crop Circle ACS-430; red and red edge bands) were conducted on four and two growth stages, respectively. Fertilization increased leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations, as well as CM readings and vegetation indices. The CCM and SPAD values did not vary across growth stages and better estimated leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations in Cabernet Sauvignon than in Xinomavro. The SPAD readings provided better predictions of leaf N concentration. The vegetation indices of the ACS-430 sensor correlated with leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations and dormant wood in Cabernet Sauvignon; the red edge-based indices were generally more efficient than the red-based indices. Consistent relationships were observed for all ACS-430 indices with yield and for red edge-based indices with total phenols early in the season for both vineyards. The correlation between ACS-210 sensor indices and vine properties was low. These results showed that the two technologies examined could provide information on grapevine performance early in the season but have limitations that may restrict their use in vineyards because the acquired relationships were not consistent across vineyards and instruments.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Precision farming</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transmittance</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Vitis vinifera</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><issn>1385-2256</issn><issn>1573-1618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1qxCAUhaW00Om0D9Cd0E03aTVqjMsy9A8GuumsxRgn45DRVM1A3r4O6aIU6kIvcr5z7z0A3GL0gBHijxHnIwqEaSFIRYr6DCww46TAFa7Pc01qVpQlqy7BVYx7hDJFywWwm2hdB5VO9migVs4PE4zGRR8iVK6Fetf74Ifd1PfwYJLJ38lDE5M9qGRgF9RgjtYZ6GwKvjMOxqTSOMND8O14srZpugYXW9VHc_PzLsHm5flz9VasP17fV0_rQhMqUsG3hijBaIORMHkVQRte0ppzRJgWdVW3pUICVZwIIhrWUk5bzbEmjUCCtowswf3sm5t_jXlQebBRm75XzvgxSlwxxmm-SZbe_ZHu_Rhcni6rKGOEn_osAZ5VOvgYg9nKIeTlwyQxkqfw5Ry-zOHLU_iyzkw5MzFrXWfCL-d_oW8-HYd4</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Taskos, D. G.</creator><creator>Koundouras, S.</creator><creator>Stamatiadis, S.</creator><creator>Zioziou, E.</creator><creator>Nikolaou, N.</creator><creator>Karakioulakis, K.</creator><creator>Theodorou, N.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Using active canopy sensors and chlorophyll meters to estimate grapevine nitrogen status and productivity</title><author>Taskos, D. G. ; Koundouras, S. ; Stamatiadis, S. ; Zioziou, E. ; Nikolaou, N. ; Karakioulakis, K. ; Theodorou, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Precision farming</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transmittance</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Vitis vinifera</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Wineries &amp; vineyards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taskos, D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koundouras, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatiadis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zioziou, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolaou, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karakioulakis, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Precision agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taskos, D. G.</au><au>Koundouras, S.</au><au>Stamatiadis, S.</au><au>Zioziou, E.</au><au>Nikolaou, N.</au><au>Karakioulakis, K.</au><au>Theodorou, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using active canopy sensors and chlorophyll meters to estimate grapevine nitrogen status and productivity</atitle><jtitle>Precision agriculture</jtitle><stitle>Precision Agric</stitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>77-98</pages><issn>1385-2256</issn><eissn>1573-1618</eissn><abstract>Effects of nitrogen (Ν) and water supply on grapevine leaf transmittance and canopy reflectance were studied over 2 years (2009–2010) in two vineyards planted with cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Xinomavro ( Vitis vinifera L.) located in northern Greece. Three N (0, 60 and 120 kg ha −1 ) and two irrigation (irrigated at 70 % of crop evapotranspiration and non-irrigated) treatments were managed in triplicate in randomized blocks. Measurements with two transmittance-based chlorophyll meters (CM: SPAD-502 and CCM-200) and two active canopy sensors (Crop Circle ACS-210; amber band and Crop Circle ACS-430; red and red edge bands) were conducted on four and two growth stages, respectively. Fertilization increased leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations, as well as CM readings and vegetation indices. The CCM and SPAD values did not vary across growth stages and better estimated leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations in Cabernet Sauvignon than in Xinomavro. The SPAD readings provided better predictions of leaf N concentration. The vegetation indices of the ACS-430 sensor correlated with leaf N and chlorophyll concentrations and dormant wood in Cabernet Sauvignon; the red edge-based indices were generally more efficient than the red-based indices. Consistent relationships were observed for all ACS-430 indices with yield and for red edge-based indices with total phenols early in the season for both vineyards. The correlation between ACS-210 sensor indices and vine properties was low. These results showed that the two technologies examined could provide information on grapevine performance early in the season but have limitations that may restrict their use in vineyards because the acquired relationships were not consistent across vineyards and instruments.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11119-014-9363-8</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-2256
ispartof Precision agriculture, 2015-02, Vol.16 (1), p.77-98
issn 1385-2256
1573-1618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1655741653
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Atmospheric Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Canopies
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Chlorophyll
Computer Science
Crop science
Crops
Evapotranspiration
Irrigation
Laboratories
Leaves
Life Sciences
Microclimate
Nitrogen
Phenols
Physics
Precision farming
Productivity
Remote sensing
Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry
Seasons
Sensors
Soil Science & Conservation
Statistics for Engineering
Studies
Transmittance
Variables
Vegetation
Vineyards
Vitaceae
Vitis vinifera
Water supply
Wineries & vineyards
title Using active canopy sensors and chlorophyll meters to estimate grapevine nitrogen status and productivity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A05%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20active%20canopy%20sensors%20and%20chlorophyll%20meters%20to%20estimate%20grapevine%20nitrogen%20status%20and%20productivity&rft.jtitle=Precision%20agriculture&rft.au=Taskos,%20D.%20G.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=77-98&rft.issn=1385-2256&rft.eissn=1573-1618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11119-014-9363-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1655741653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7fe3a954b109e93694b724877035c9868d2a090673939b5d474dc71c3b9094d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645537067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true