EU and China: Destined to Be Partners in Shaping the Post-Kyoto Regime?

This paper argues that China and the EU are destined to be partners in fighting for a second period of commitments for global climate change governance and shaping the post-Kyoto regime to meet the anticipated challenges of the 21 st century. The basic idea backing this argumentation is the assessme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social sciences in China 2014-07, Vol.35 (3), p.187-198
Main Author: Xuewu, Gu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Canada
China
Choices
Climate Change
energy security
Environmental Protection
Europe
European Union
global climate change
Governance
Japan
Kyoto Protocol
Kyoto Regime
Modernization
Objectivity
Peoples Republic of China
Russia
Twenty First Century
U.S.A
中国
京都制度
全球气候变化
欧盟
能源安全
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213
container_end_page 198
container_issue 3
container_start_page 187
container_title Social sciences in China
container_volume 35
creator Xuewu, Gu
description This paper argues that China and the EU are destined to be partners in fighting for a second period of commitments for global climate change governance and shaping the post-Kyoto regime to meet the anticipated challenges of the 21 st century. The basic idea backing this argumentation is the assessment that, in comparison with other nations (the United States, Russia, India, Japan and Canada), Europe and China would have most to lose if the upgrading of the Kyoto Protocol fails; and conversely, they would have most to win if the regime survives in a modernized form and with a more comprehensive application of international binding commitments. This is to say, the EU and China have no choice but to work together if they want to achieve their respective political objectives relating to the issue of global climate change in a less costly and more effective way.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02529203.2014.927116
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660021177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660021177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEWWbqbm5jUTN6K1VlFQfKxDOpPYyDSpyRTpv3dKdauuLhy-c7jwIXQMZASkIqeECqooYSNKgI8ULQHkDhqA4qQQStBdNNggxYbZRwc5vxPCqVDlAE0nr9iEBo_nPpgzfGVz54NtcBfxpcWPJnXBpox9wM9zs_ThDXfzPo-5K-7Wsaee7Jtf2PNDtOdMm-3R9x2i1-vJy_imuH-Y3o4v7ouaUeiKumINcCE4ca6REuTMSFMpZhznytGZcA0wM1OKCstIVSthrHJk5lRdOkWBDdHJdneZ4seq_1YvfK5t25pg4yprkJIQClCW_0OhVCX_GxWVBFIyWfUo36J1ijkn6_Qy-YVJaw1Eb2zoHxt6Y0NvbfS1823NBxfTwnzG1Da6M-s2JpdMqH3W7NeFLzpGjXk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1586107368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EU and China: Destined to Be Partners in Shaping the Post-Kyoto Regime?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Xuewu, Gu</creator><creatorcontrib>Xuewu, Gu</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues that China and the EU are destined to be partners in fighting for a second period of commitments for global climate change governance and shaping the post-Kyoto regime to meet the anticipated challenges of the 21 st century. The basic idea backing this argumentation is the assessment that, in comparison with other nations (the United States, Russia, India, Japan and Canada), Europe and China would have most to lose if the upgrading of the Kyoto Protocol fails; and conversely, they would have most to win if the regime survives in a modernized form and with a more comprehensive application of international binding commitments. This is to say, the EU and China have no choice but to work together if they want to achieve their respective political objectives relating to the issue of global climate change in a less costly and more effective way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0252-9203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-5952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2014.927116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Canada ; China ; Choices ; Climate Change ; energy security ; Environmental Protection ; Europe ; European Union ; global climate change ; Governance ; Japan ; Kyoto Protocol ; Kyoto Regime ; Modernization ; Objectivity ; Peoples Republic of China ; Russia ; Twenty First Century ; U.S.A ; 中国 ; 京都制度 ; 全球气候变化 ; 欧盟 ; 能源安全</subject><ispartof>Social sciences in China, 2014-07, Vol.35 (3), p.187-198</ispartof><rights>2014 Social Sciences in China Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901,33200,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xuewu, Gu</creatorcontrib><title>EU and China: Destined to Be Partners in Shaping the Post-Kyoto Regime?</title><title>Social sciences in China</title><description>This paper argues that China and the EU are destined to be partners in fighting for a second period of commitments for global climate change governance and shaping the post-Kyoto regime to meet the anticipated challenges of the 21 st century. The basic idea backing this argumentation is the assessment that, in comparison with other nations (the United States, Russia, India, Japan and Canada), Europe and China would have most to lose if the upgrading of the Kyoto Protocol fails; and conversely, they would have most to win if the regime survives in a modernized form and with a more comprehensive application of international binding commitments. This is to say, the EU and China have no choice but to work together if they want to achieve their respective political objectives relating to the issue of global climate change in a less costly and more effective way.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>energy security</subject><subject>Environmental Protection</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>global climate change</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><subject>Kyoto Regime</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Twenty First Century</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>中国</subject><subject>京都制度</subject><subject>全球气候变化</subject><subject>欧盟</subject><subject>能源安全</subject><issn>0252-9203</issn><issn>1940-5952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEWWbqbm5jUTN6K1VlFQfKxDOpPYyDSpyRTpv3dKdauuLhy-c7jwIXQMZASkIqeECqooYSNKgI8ULQHkDhqA4qQQStBdNNggxYbZRwc5vxPCqVDlAE0nr9iEBo_nPpgzfGVz54NtcBfxpcWPJnXBpox9wM9zs_ThDXfzPo-5K-7Wsaee7Jtf2PNDtOdMm-3R9x2i1-vJy_imuH-Y3o4v7ouaUeiKumINcCE4ca6REuTMSFMpZhznytGZcA0wM1OKCstIVSthrHJk5lRdOkWBDdHJdneZ4seq_1YvfK5t25pg4yprkJIQClCW_0OhVCX_GxWVBFIyWfUo36J1ijkn6_Qy-YVJaw1Eb2zoHxt6Y0NvbfS1823NBxfTwnzG1Da6M-s2JpdMqH3W7NeFLzpGjXk</recordid><startdate>20140703</startdate><enddate>20140703</enddate><creator>Xuewu, Gu</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140703</creationdate><title>EU and China: Destined to Be Partners in Shaping the Post-Kyoto Regime?</title><author>Xuewu, Gu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>energy security</topic><topic>Environmental Protection</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>global climate change</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><topic>Kyoto Regime</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Twenty First Century</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>中国</topic><topic>京都制度</topic><topic>全球气候变化</topic><topic>欧盟</topic><topic>能源安全</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xuewu, Gu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social sciences in China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xuewu, Gu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EU and China: Destined to Be Partners in Shaping the Post-Kyoto Regime?</atitle><jtitle>Social sciences in China</jtitle><date>2014-07-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>187-198</pages><issn>0252-9203</issn><eissn>1940-5952</eissn><abstract>This paper argues that China and the EU are destined to be partners in fighting for a second period of commitments for global climate change governance and shaping the post-Kyoto regime to meet the anticipated challenges of the 21 st century. The basic idea backing this argumentation is the assessment that, in comparison with other nations (the United States, Russia, India, Japan and Canada), Europe and China would have most to lose if the upgrading of the Kyoto Protocol fails; and conversely, they would have most to win if the regime survives in a modernized form and with a more comprehensive application of international binding commitments. This is to say, the EU and China have no choice but to work together if they want to achieve their respective political objectives relating to the issue of global climate change in a less costly and more effective way.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02529203.2014.927116</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0252-9203
ispartof Social sciences in China, 2014-07, Vol.35 (3), p.187-198
issn 0252-9203
1940-5952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660021177
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Canada
China
Choices
Climate Change
energy security
Environmental Protection
Europe
European Union
global climate change
Governance
Japan
Kyoto Protocol
Kyoto Regime
Modernization
Objectivity
Peoples Republic of China
Russia
Twenty First Century
U.S.A
中国
京都制度
全球气候变化
欧盟
能源安全
title EU and China: Destined to Be Partners in Shaping the Post-Kyoto Regime?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T17%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EU%20and%20China:%20Destined%20to%20Be%20Partners%20in%20Shaping%20the%20Post-Kyoto%20Regime?&rft.jtitle=Social%20sciences%20in%20China&rft.au=Xuewu,%20Gu&rft.date=2014-07-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=187-198&rft.issn=0252-9203&rft.eissn=1940-5952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02529203.2014.927116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660021177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c83d145540ffd6616ba6a893af449f2b5fd13ab9925e308c95ae9f0bf9c7f9213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1586107368&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true