Loading…
Energy efficiency for the removal of non-polar pollutants during ultraviolet irradiation, visible light photocatalysis and ozonation of a wastewater effluent
This study aims to assess the removal of a set of non-polar pollutants in biologically treated wastewater using ozonation, ultraviolet (UV 254 nm low pressure mercury lamp) and visible light (Xe-arc lamp) irradiation as well as visible light photocatalysis using Ce-doped TiO2. The compounds tracked...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2013-10, Vol.47 (15), p.5546-5556 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463 |
container_end_page | 5556 |
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 5546 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Santiago-Morales, Javier Gómez, María José Herrera-López, Sonia Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R. García-Calvo, Eloy Rosal, Roberto |
description | This study aims to assess the removal of a set of non-polar pollutants in biologically treated wastewater using ozonation, ultraviolet (UV 254 nm low pressure mercury lamp) and visible light (Xe-arc lamp) irradiation as well as visible light photocatalysis using Ce-doped TiO2. The compounds tracked include UV filters, synthetic musks, herbicides, insecticides, antiseptics and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Raw wastewater and treated samples were analyzed using stir-bar sorptive extraction coupled with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (SBSE–CG × GC–TOF–MS). Ozone treatment could remove most pollutants with a global efficiency of over 95% for 209 μM ozone dosage. UV irradiation reduced the total concentration of the sixteen pollutants tested by an average of 63% with high removal of the sunscreen 2-ethylhexyl trans-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC), the synthetic musk 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyltetrahydronaphthalene (tonalide, AHTN) and several herbicides. Visible light Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis reached ∼70% overall removal with particularly high efficiency for synthetic musks. In terms of power usage efficiency expressed as nmol kJ−1, the results showed that ozonation was by far the most efficient process, ten-fold over Xe/Ce–TiO2 visible light photocatalysis, the latter being in turn considerably more efficient than UV irradiation. In all cases the efficiency decreased along the treatments due to the lower reaction rate at lower pollutant concentration. The use of photocatalysis greatly improved the efficiency of visible light irradiation. The collector area per order decreased from 9.14 ± 5.11 m2 m−3 order−1 for visible light irradiation to 0.16 ± 0.03 m2 m−3 order−1 for Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis. The toxicity of treated wastewater was assessed using the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ozonation reduced the toxicity of treated wastewater, while UV irradiation and visible light photocatalysis limited by 20–25% the algal growth due to the accumulation of reaction by-products. Three transformation products were identified and tracked along the treatments.
[Display omitted]
•Removal of non-polar micropollutants from wastewater.•Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) for analyses.•Highest energy efficiency was obtained for ozonation treatment.•Visible light photocatalysis displayed high removal efficiency for synthetic musks.•Toxicity increased for irradiation treatments but decreased for ozonation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.030 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660046667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135413005216</els_id><sourcerecordid>1647010199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks-O0zAQhyMEYsvCGyDwBYkDKXbs2skFCa2WP9JKHGDP1sSZtK5cu9hOV-VdeFecbYEb4mJfvvFvPN9U1XNGl4wy-Xa7vIMcMS0byviSyiXl9EG1YK3q6kaI9mG1oFTwmvGVuKiepLSllDYN7x5XFw1vJeeKLaqf1x7j-khwHK2x6M2RjCGSvEEScRcO4EgYiQ--3gcHkZTTTRl8TmSYovVrMrkc4WCDw0xsjDBYyDb4N-Rgk-0dEmfXm0z2m5CDgQzumGwi4AcSfgR_z84RQO4gZSx_wjh34yb0-Wn1aASX8Nn5vqxuP1x_u_pU33z5-Pnq_U1tRNvkGo1aDRIbPqqhQcZxhKEH2nVKdQalEi1lHQrVY89AYNt3ho68VbCCgXEh-WX1-vTuPobvE6asdzYZdA48hilpJmWZpZRS_QcqFC2Cuq6g4oSaGFKKOOp9tDuIR82onh3qrT451LNDTaUuDkvZi3PC1O9w-FP0W1oBXp0BSAbcGMEbm_5ySinKxcy9PHEjBA3rWJjbryVpVRaBdm0zd_juRGAZ7sFi1Ol-CXCwEU3WQ7D_7vUXJVHJ3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647010199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy efficiency for the removal of non-polar pollutants during ultraviolet irradiation, visible light photocatalysis and ozonation of a wastewater effluent</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Santiago-Morales, Javier ; Gómez, María José ; Herrera-López, Sonia ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R. ; García-Calvo, Eloy ; Rosal, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Morales, Javier ; Gómez, María José ; Herrera-López, Sonia ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R. ; García-Calvo, Eloy ; Rosal, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to assess the removal of a set of non-polar pollutants in biologically treated wastewater using ozonation, ultraviolet (UV 254 nm low pressure mercury lamp) and visible light (Xe-arc lamp) irradiation as well as visible light photocatalysis using Ce-doped TiO2. The compounds tracked include UV filters, synthetic musks, herbicides, insecticides, antiseptics and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Raw wastewater and treated samples were analyzed using stir-bar sorptive extraction coupled with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (SBSE–CG × GC–TOF–MS). Ozone treatment could remove most pollutants with a global efficiency of over 95% for 209 μM ozone dosage. UV irradiation reduced the total concentration of the sixteen pollutants tested by an average of 63% with high removal of the sunscreen 2-ethylhexyl trans-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC), the synthetic musk 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyltetrahydronaphthalene (tonalide, AHTN) and several herbicides. Visible light Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis reached ∼70% overall removal with particularly high efficiency for synthetic musks. In terms of power usage efficiency expressed as nmol kJ−1, the results showed that ozonation was by far the most efficient process, ten-fold over Xe/Ce–TiO2 visible light photocatalysis, the latter being in turn considerably more efficient than UV irradiation. In all cases the efficiency decreased along the treatments due to the lower reaction rate at lower pollutant concentration. The use of photocatalysis greatly improved the efficiency of visible light irradiation. The collector area per order decreased from 9.14 ± 5.11 m2 m−3 order−1 for visible light irradiation to 0.16 ± 0.03 m2 m−3 order−1 for Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis. The toxicity of treated wastewater was assessed using the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ozonation reduced the toxicity of treated wastewater, while UV irradiation and visible light photocatalysis limited by 20–25% the algal growth due to the accumulation of reaction by-products. Three transformation products were identified and tracked along the treatments.
[Display omitted]
•Removal of non-polar micropollutants from wastewater.•Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) for analyses.•Highest energy efficiency was obtained for ozonation treatment.•Visible light photocatalysis displayed high removal efficiency for synthetic musks.•Toxicity increased for irradiation treatments but decreased for ozonation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23863371</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>antiseptics ; Applied sciences ; Byproducts ; comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography ; Energy efficiency ; Exact sciences and technology ; filters ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; herbicides ; insecticides ; Irradiation ; mercury ; Musk ; Non-polar pollutants ; Ozonation ; ozone ; Ozone - chemistry ; Photocatalysis ; Photochemistry - methods ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata ; Selenastrum capricornutum ; titanium dioxide ; Toxicity ; Ultraviolet ; Ultraviolet irradiation ; ultraviolet radiation ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Visible light photocatalysis ; Waste water ; Waste Water - chemistry ; wastewater ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2013-10, Vol.47 (15), p.5546-5556</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27770341$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23863371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Morales, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera-López, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Calvo, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosal, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>Energy efficiency for the removal of non-polar pollutants during ultraviolet irradiation, visible light photocatalysis and ozonation of a wastewater effluent</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>This study aims to assess the removal of a set of non-polar pollutants in biologically treated wastewater using ozonation, ultraviolet (UV 254 nm low pressure mercury lamp) and visible light (Xe-arc lamp) irradiation as well as visible light photocatalysis using Ce-doped TiO2. The compounds tracked include UV filters, synthetic musks, herbicides, insecticides, antiseptics and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Raw wastewater and treated samples were analyzed using stir-bar sorptive extraction coupled with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (SBSE–CG × GC–TOF–MS). Ozone treatment could remove most pollutants with a global efficiency of over 95% for 209 μM ozone dosage. UV irradiation reduced the total concentration of the sixteen pollutants tested by an average of 63% with high removal of the sunscreen 2-ethylhexyl trans-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC), the synthetic musk 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyltetrahydronaphthalene (tonalide, AHTN) and several herbicides. Visible light Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis reached ∼70% overall removal with particularly high efficiency for synthetic musks. In terms of power usage efficiency expressed as nmol kJ−1, the results showed that ozonation was by far the most efficient process, ten-fold over Xe/Ce–TiO2 visible light photocatalysis, the latter being in turn considerably more efficient than UV irradiation. In all cases the efficiency decreased along the treatments due to the lower reaction rate at lower pollutant concentration. The use of photocatalysis greatly improved the efficiency of visible light irradiation. The collector area per order decreased from 9.14 ± 5.11 m2 m−3 order−1 for visible light irradiation to 0.16 ± 0.03 m2 m−3 order−1 for Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis. The toxicity of treated wastewater was assessed using the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ozonation reduced the toxicity of treated wastewater, while UV irradiation and visible light photocatalysis limited by 20–25% the algal growth due to the accumulation of reaction by-products. Three transformation products were identified and tracked along the treatments.
[Display omitted]
•Removal of non-polar micropollutants from wastewater.•Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) for analyses.•Highest energy efficiency was obtained for ozonation treatment.•Visible light photocatalysis displayed high removal efficiency for synthetic musks.•Toxicity increased for irradiation treatments but decreased for ozonation.</description><subject>antiseptics</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>filters</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>herbicides</subject><subject>insecticides</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>mercury</subject><subject>Musk</subject><subject>Non-polar pollutants</subject><subject>Ozonation</subject><subject>ozone</subject><subject>Ozone - chemistry</subject><subject>Photocatalysis</subject><subject>Photochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata</subject><subject>Selenastrum capricornutum</subject><subject>titanium dioxide</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Ultraviolet</subject><subject>Ultraviolet irradiation</subject><subject>ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>Visible light photocatalysis</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Waste Water - chemistry</subject><subject>wastewater</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks-O0zAQhyMEYsvCGyDwBYkDKXbs2skFCa2WP9JKHGDP1sSZtK5cu9hOV-VdeFecbYEb4mJfvvFvPN9U1XNGl4wy-Xa7vIMcMS0byviSyiXl9EG1YK3q6kaI9mG1oFTwmvGVuKiepLSllDYN7x5XFw1vJeeKLaqf1x7j-khwHK2x6M2RjCGSvEEScRcO4EgYiQ--3gcHkZTTTRl8TmSYovVrMrkc4WCDw0xsjDBYyDb4N-Rgk-0dEmfXm0z2m5CDgQzumGwi4AcSfgR_z84RQO4gZSx_wjh34yb0-Wn1aASX8Nn5vqxuP1x_u_pU33z5-Pnq_U1tRNvkGo1aDRIbPqqhQcZxhKEH2nVKdQalEi1lHQrVY89AYNt3ho68VbCCgXEh-WX1-vTuPobvE6asdzYZdA48hilpJmWZpZRS_QcqFC2Cuq6g4oSaGFKKOOp9tDuIR82onh3qrT451LNDTaUuDkvZi3PC1O9w-FP0W1oBXp0BSAbcGMEbm_5ySinKxcy9PHEjBA3rWJjbryVpVRaBdm0zd_juRGAZ7sFi1Ol-CXCwEU3WQ7D_7vUXJVHJ3Q</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Santiago-Morales, Javier</creator><creator>Gómez, María José</creator><creator>Herrera-López, Sonia</creator><creator>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creator><creator>García-Calvo, Eloy</creator><creator>Rosal, Roberto</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Energy efficiency for the removal of non-polar pollutants during ultraviolet irradiation, visible light photocatalysis and ozonation of a wastewater effluent</title><author>Santiago-Morales, Javier ; Gómez, María José ; Herrera-López, Sonia ; Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R. ; García-Calvo, Eloy ; Rosal, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>antiseptics</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>filters</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>herbicides</topic><topic>insecticides</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>mercury</topic><topic>Musk</topic><topic>Non-polar pollutants</topic><topic>Ozonation</topic><topic>ozone</topic><topic>Ozone - chemistry</topic><topic>Photocatalysis</topic><topic>Photochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata</topic><topic>Selenastrum capricornutum</topic><topic>titanium dioxide</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Ultraviolet</topic><topic>Ultraviolet irradiation</topic><topic>ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>Visible light photocatalysis</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Waste Water - chemistry</topic><topic>wastewater</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Morales, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera-López, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Calvo, Eloy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosal, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santiago-Morales, Javier</au><au>Gómez, María José</au><au>Herrera-López, Sonia</au><au>Fernández-Alba, Amadeo R.</au><au>García-Calvo, Eloy</au><au>Rosal, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy efficiency for the removal of non-polar pollutants during ultraviolet irradiation, visible light photocatalysis and ozonation of a wastewater effluent</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>5546</spage><epage>5556</epage><pages>5546-5556</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>This study aims to assess the removal of a set of non-polar pollutants in biologically treated wastewater using ozonation, ultraviolet (UV 254 nm low pressure mercury lamp) and visible light (Xe-arc lamp) irradiation as well as visible light photocatalysis using Ce-doped TiO2. The compounds tracked include UV filters, synthetic musks, herbicides, insecticides, antiseptics and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Raw wastewater and treated samples were analyzed using stir-bar sorptive extraction coupled with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (SBSE–CG × GC–TOF–MS). Ozone treatment could remove most pollutants with a global efficiency of over 95% for 209 μM ozone dosage. UV irradiation reduced the total concentration of the sixteen pollutants tested by an average of 63% with high removal of the sunscreen 2-ethylhexyl trans-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC), the synthetic musk 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyltetrahydronaphthalene (tonalide, AHTN) and several herbicides. Visible light Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis reached ∼70% overall removal with particularly high efficiency for synthetic musks. In terms of power usage efficiency expressed as nmol kJ−1, the results showed that ozonation was by far the most efficient process, ten-fold over Xe/Ce–TiO2 visible light photocatalysis, the latter being in turn considerably more efficient than UV irradiation. In all cases the efficiency decreased along the treatments due to the lower reaction rate at lower pollutant concentration. The use of photocatalysis greatly improved the efficiency of visible light irradiation. The collector area per order decreased from 9.14 ± 5.11 m2 m−3 order−1 for visible light irradiation to 0.16 ± 0.03 m2 m−3 order−1 for Ce–TiO2 photocatalysis. The toxicity of treated wastewater was assessed using the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ozonation reduced the toxicity of treated wastewater, while UV irradiation and visible light photocatalysis limited by 20–25% the algal growth due to the accumulation of reaction by-products. Three transformation products were identified and tracked along the treatments.
[Display omitted]
•Removal of non-polar micropollutants from wastewater.•Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) for analyses.•Highest energy efficiency was obtained for ozonation treatment.•Visible light photocatalysis displayed high removal efficiency for synthetic musks.•Toxicity increased for irradiation treatments but decreased for ozonation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23863371</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.030</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2013-10, Vol.47 (15), p.5546-5556 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660046667 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | antiseptics Applied sciences Byproducts comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography Energy efficiency Exact sciences and technology filters Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry herbicides insecticides Irradiation mercury Musk Non-polar pollutants Ozonation ozone Ozone - chemistry Photocatalysis Photochemistry - methods Pollutants Pollution polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Selenastrum capricornutum titanium dioxide Toxicity Ultraviolet Ultraviolet irradiation ultraviolet radiation Ultraviolet Rays Visible light photocatalysis Waste water Waste Water - chemistry wastewater Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Water treatment and pollution |
title | Energy efficiency for the removal of non-polar pollutants during ultraviolet irradiation, visible light photocatalysis and ozonation of a wastewater effluent |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20efficiency%20for%20the%20removal%20of%20non-polar%20pollutants%20during%20ultraviolet%20irradiation,%20visible%20light%20photocatalysis%20and%20ozonation%20of%20a%20wastewater%20effluent&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Santiago-Morales,%20Javier&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=5546&rft.epage=5556&rft.pages=5546-5556&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1647010199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-ec75d6e23f7d2e13efadba099779ce6748019e47beb1a4e8b9c0f387a5ad13463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647010199&rft_id=info:pmid/23863371&rfr_iscdi=true |