Loading…

Nest survival of Red-winged Blackbirds in agricultural areas developed for wind energy

•534 nests were monitored at three paired turbine and control sites.•We model daily nest survival for incubation and nestling stages.•We found no difference in survival between control and turbine sites.•Turbine proximity did not affect survival in the incubation stage.•Survival was slightly higher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2014-12, Vol.197, p.53-59
Main Authors: Gillespie, Molly K., Dinsmore, Stephen J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63
container_end_page 59
container_issue
container_start_page 53
container_title Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
container_volume 197
creator Gillespie, Molly K.
Dinsmore, Stephen J.
description •534 nests were monitored at three paired turbine and control sites.•We model daily nest survival for incubation and nestling stages.•We found no difference in survival between control and turbine sites.•Turbine proximity did not affect survival in the incubation stage.•Survival was slightly higher closer to turbines in the nestling stage. Wind energy development is a major priority in the United States, both economically and environmentally. However, there are growing concerns about the impacts to wildlife, including direct mortality and indirect effects such as displacement. Yet little knowledge has been gained regarding effects on reproduction. We monitored 534 Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) nests at three wind farms and paired control sites in Iowa during 2011 and 2012 to determine what effect, if any, wind turbine proximity had on the survival of nests. We modeled daily nest survival rates during the incubation and nestling stages in program MARK. In addition to proximity to turbine, we included other covariates which are known to effect nest survival including nest height, vegetation above nest, Robel pole vegetation density measures, age of nest, distance to woodlot, and Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism. We found no differences in survival between our control and turbine sites at any site or year, and no effect of turbine proximity during the incubation stage. The best model for the nestling stage included a small effect of turbine proximity, with nest survival being slightly higher, though not significantly so, closer to turbines. Our results indicate that, for a generalist species breeding in an agricultural landscape, wind turbine proximity has negligible effects on reproductive success.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660047387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880914003727</els_id><sourcerecordid>1647005770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EEkvhBTj5UolL0rGd2I7US6mAVqpAQsDVmrXHK2_TZLE3i_r2eLUVxzKXuXz_P5qPsfcCWgFCX2xb3BC1EkTXgmlByBdsJaxRjVTQv2SrCpnGWhheszelbKGOVHbFfn2lsudlyYd0wJHPkX-n0PxJ04YC_ziiv1-nHApPE8dNTn4Z90uuIGbCwgMdaJx3FY1z5jUVOE2UN49v2auIY6F3T_uM_fz86cf1TXP37cvt9dVd49Wg9w2JQUujFUGgdVxjL62wKkRt-zAIMDpaOfS-QyQ9-EFSBIxCGVRrbbuo1Rn7cOrd5fn3Ul9xD6l4GkecaF6KE1oDdEZVE_9HOwPQGwMVlSfU57mUTNHtcnrA_OgEuKNvt3VH3-7o24Fx1XcNnT_1Y_E4xoyTT-VfUlprzCBF5S5PHFUvh0TZFZ9o8hRSJr93YU7PnfkL6JSVqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647005770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nest survival of Red-winged Blackbirds in agricultural areas developed for wind energy</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Gillespie, Molly K. ; Dinsmore, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Molly K. ; Dinsmore, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>•534 nests were monitored at three paired turbine and control sites.•We model daily nest survival for incubation and nestling stages.•We found no difference in survival between control and turbine sites.•Turbine proximity did not affect survival in the incubation stage.•Survival was slightly higher closer to turbines in the nestling stage. Wind energy development is a major priority in the United States, both economically and environmentally. However, there are growing concerns about the impacts to wildlife, including direct mortality and indirect effects such as displacement. Yet little knowledge has been gained regarding effects on reproduction. We monitored 534 Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) nests at three wind farms and paired control sites in Iowa during 2011 and 2012 to determine what effect, if any, wind turbine proximity had on the survival of nests. We modeled daily nest survival rates during the incubation and nestling stages in program MARK. In addition to proximity to turbine, we included other covariates which are known to effect nest survival including nest height, vegetation above nest, Robel pole vegetation density measures, age of nest, distance to woodlot, and Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism. We found no differences in survival between our control and turbine sites at any site or year, and no effect of turbine proximity during the incubation stage. The best model for the nestling stage included a small effect of turbine proximity, with nest survival being slightly higher, though not significantly so, closer to turbines. Our results indicate that, for a generalist species breeding in an agricultural landscape, wind turbine proximity has negligible effects on reproductive success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEENDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agelaius ; Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Farming ; Farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Molothrus ; Molothrus ater ; Nest survival ; Program MARK ; Proximity ; Red-winged Blackbird ; Survival ; Turbine ; Turbines ; Vegetation ; Wind energy ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment, 2014-12, Vol.197, p.53-59</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28877921$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Molly K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Nest survival of Red-winged Blackbirds in agricultural areas developed for wind energy</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</title><description>•534 nests were monitored at three paired turbine and control sites.•We model daily nest survival for incubation and nestling stages.•We found no difference in survival between control and turbine sites.•Turbine proximity did not affect survival in the incubation stage.•Survival was slightly higher closer to turbines in the nestling stage. Wind energy development is a major priority in the United States, both economically and environmentally. However, there are growing concerns about the impacts to wildlife, including direct mortality and indirect effects such as displacement. Yet little knowledge has been gained regarding effects on reproduction. We monitored 534 Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) nests at three wind farms and paired control sites in Iowa during 2011 and 2012 to determine what effect, if any, wind turbine proximity had on the survival of nests. We modeled daily nest survival rates during the incubation and nestling stages in program MARK. In addition to proximity to turbine, we included other covariates which are known to effect nest survival including nest height, vegetation above nest, Robel pole vegetation density measures, age of nest, distance to woodlot, and Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism. We found no differences in survival between our control and turbine sites at any site or year, and no effect of turbine proximity during the incubation stage. The best model for the nestling stage included a small effect of turbine proximity, with nest survival being slightly higher, though not significantly so, closer to turbines. Our results indicate that, for a generalist species breeding in an agricultural landscape, wind turbine proximity has negligible effects on reproductive success.</description><subject>Agelaius</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Molothrus</subject><subject>Molothrus ater</subject><subject>Nest survival</subject><subject>Program MARK</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Red-winged Blackbird</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Turbine</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wind energy</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EEkvhBTj5UolL0rGd2I7US6mAVqpAQsDVmrXHK2_TZLE3i_r2eLUVxzKXuXz_P5qPsfcCWgFCX2xb3BC1EkTXgmlByBdsJaxRjVTQv2SrCpnGWhheszelbKGOVHbFfn2lsudlyYd0wJHPkX-n0PxJ04YC_ziiv1-nHApPE8dNTn4Z90uuIGbCwgMdaJx3FY1z5jUVOE2UN49v2auIY6F3T_uM_fz86cf1TXP37cvt9dVd49Wg9w2JQUujFUGgdVxjL62wKkRt-zAIMDpaOfS-QyQ9-EFSBIxCGVRrbbuo1Rn7cOrd5fn3Ul9xD6l4GkecaF6KE1oDdEZVE_9HOwPQGwMVlSfU57mUTNHtcnrA_OgEuKNvt3VH3-7o24Fx1XcNnT_1Y_E4xoyTT-VfUlprzCBF5S5PHFUvh0TZFZ9o8hRSJr93YU7PnfkL6JSVqg</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Gillespie, Molly K.</creator><creator>Dinsmore, Stephen J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Nest survival of Red-winged Blackbirds in agricultural areas developed for wind energy</title><author>Gillespie, Molly K. ; Dinsmore, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agelaius</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Molothrus</topic><topic>Molothrus ater</topic><topic>Nest survival</topic><topic>Program MARK</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Red-winged Blackbird</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Turbine</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wind energy</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Molly K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinsmore, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillespie, Molly K.</au><au>Dinsmore, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nest survival of Red-winged Blackbirds in agricultural areas developed for wind energy</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>197</volume><spage>53</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>53-59</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><coden>AEENDO</coden><abstract>•534 nests were monitored at three paired turbine and control sites.•We model daily nest survival for incubation and nestling stages.•We found no difference in survival between control and turbine sites.•Turbine proximity did not affect survival in the incubation stage.•Survival was slightly higher closer to turbines in the nestling stage. Wind energy development is a major priority in the United States, both economically and environmentally. However, there are growing concerns about the impacts to wildlife, including direct mortality and indirect effects such as displacement. Yet little knowledge has been gained regarding effects on reproduction. We monitored 534 Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) nests at three wind farms and paired control sites in Iowa during 2011 and 2012 to determine what effect, if any, wind turbine proximity had on the survival of nests. We modeled daily nest survival rates during the incubation and nestling stages in program MARK. In addition to proximity to turbine, we included other covariates which are known to effect nest survival including nest height, vegetation above nest, Robel pole vegetation density measures, age of nest, distance to woodlot, and Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism. We found no differences in survival between our control and turbine sites at any site or year, and no effect of turbine proximity during the incubation stage. The best model for the nestling stage included a small effect of turbine proximity, with nest survival being slightly higher, though not significantly so, closer to turbines. Our results indicate that, for a generalist species breeding in an agricultural landscape, wind turbine proximity has negligible effects on reproductive success.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.012</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8809
ispartof Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2014-12, Vol.197, p.53-59
issn 0167-8809
1873-2305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660047387
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Agelaius
Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Farming
Farms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Molothrus
Molothrus ater
Nest survival
Program MARK
Proximity
Red-winged Blackbird
Survival
Turbine
Turbines
Vegetation
Wind energy
Wind turbines
title Nest survival of Red-winged Blackbirds in agricultural areas developed for wind energy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A54%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nest%20survival%20of%20Red-winged%20Blackbirds%20in%20agricultural%20areas%20developed%20for%20wind%20energy&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Gillespie,%20Molly%20K.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=197&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=53-59&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft.coden=AEENDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1647005770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-e1962763e0debfba528183df685d91076f8295c4aae69c92ef0af137a3b684f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647005770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true