Loading…
Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience
•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•...
Saved in:
Published in: | Safety science 2015-02, Vol.72, p.172-181 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513 |
container_end_page | 181 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Safety science |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Pak, Ji-Yeong Yeo, Gi-Tae Oh, Se-Woong Yang, Zaili |
description | •Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance.
There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660058446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753514002173</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660058446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAQgDOARCm8AJNHloQ7x84PYkEVf6ISDGW2HOciXKVxsNMKNl6D1-NJSFRmxHTDfd9J90XRGUKCgNnFOgnB2IQDigTKBCA_iGZQchnnMpVH0XEIawDANMNZtHx2fmBBNzR8MNrpdqsH6zrWeLdhmhndD9p2359fgfXkQ09msDu6ZKtXYo_Ok-4YvY8bS52hk-iw0W2g0985j15ub1aL-3j5dPewuF7GRiAMcUqoi4qgKVLEEjPKc1GnlHGqqkYWnDhCzXkhqrqShlBIKQ1PC-C5pFpiOo_O93d77962FAa1scFQ2-qO3DYozDIAWQiR_QMVOUBRchhRvkeNdyF4alTv7Ub7D4WgprJqraayaiqroFRj2VG62ks0_ruz5NVITC1q68dWqnb2L_0HP6CEKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647008920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Pak, Ji-Yeong ; Yeo, Gi-Tae ; Oh, Se-Woong ; Yang, Zaili</creator><creatorcontrib>Pak, Ji-Yeong ; Yeo, Gi-Tae ; Oh, Se-Woong ; Yang, Zaili</creatorcontrib><description>•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance.
There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climatology ; Expert knowledge ; Fuzzy ; Fuzzy AHP ; Fuzzy logic ; Maritime risk ; Maritime safety ; Maritime transport ; Port safety factors ; Ports ; Quantitative analysis ; Safety ; Safety evaluation ; Ships ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2015-02, Vol.72, p.172-181</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pak, Ji-Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Gi-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Se-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zaili</creatorcontrib><title>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</title><title>Safety science</title><description>•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance.
There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.</description><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Expert knowledge</subject><subject>Fuzzy</subject><subject>Fuzzy AHP</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Maritime risk</subject><subject>Maritime safety</subject><subject>Maritime transport</subject><subject>Port safety factors</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety evaluation</subject><subject>Ships</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAQgDOARCm8AJNHloQ7x84PYkEVf6ISDGW2HOciXKVxsNMKNl6D1-NJSFRmxHTDfd9J90XRGUKCgNnFOgnB2IQDigTKBCA_iGZQchnnMpVH0XEIawDANMNZtHx2fmBBNzR8MNrpdqsH6zrWeLdhmhndD9p2359fgfXkQ09msDu6ZKtXYo_Ok-4YvY8bS52hk-iw0W2g0985j15ub1aL-3j5dPewuF7GRiAMcUqoi4qgKVLEEjPKc1GnlHGqqkYWnDhCzXkhqrqShlBIKQ1PC-C5pFpiOo_O93d77962FAa1scFQ2-qO3DYozDIAWQiR_QMVOUBRchhRvkeNdyF4alTv7Ub7D4WgprJqraayaiqroFRj2VG62ks0_ruz5NVITC1q68dWqnb2L_0HP6CEKw</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Pak, Ji-Yeong</creator><creator>Yeo, Gi-Tae</creator><creator>Oh, Se-Woong</creator><creator>Yang, Zaili</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</title><author>Pak, Ji-Yeong ; Yeo, Gi-Tae ; Oh, Se-Woong ; Yang, Zaili</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Expert knowledge</topic><topic>Fuzzy</topic><topic>Fuzzy AHP</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Maritime risk</topic><topic>Maritime safety</topic><topic>Maritime transport</topic><topic>Port safety factors</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety evaluation</topic><topic>Ships</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pak, Ji-Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Gi-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Se-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zaili</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pak, Ji-Yeong</au><au>Yeo, Gi-Tae</au><au>Oh, Se-Woong</au><au>Yang, Zaili</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>172</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>172-181</pages><issn>0925-7535</issn><abstract>•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance.
There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-7535 |
ispartof | Safety science, 2015-02, Vol.72, p.172-181 |
issn | 0925-7535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660058446 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Climatology Expert knowledge Fuzzy Fuzzy AHP Fuzzy logic Maritime risk Maritime safety Maritime transport Port safety factors Ports Quantitative analysis Safety Safety evaluation Ships Weather |
title | Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Port%20safety%20evaluation%20from%20a%20captain%E2%80%99s%20perspective:%20The%20Korean%20experience&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Pak,%20Ji-Yeong&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=172-181&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660058446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647008920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |