Loading…

Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience

•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Safety science 2015-02, Vol.72, p.172-181
Main Authors: Pak, Ji-Yeong, Yeo, Gi-Tae, Oh, Se-Woong, Yang, Zaili
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513
container_end_page 181
container_issue
container_start_page 172
container_title Safety science
container_volume 72
creator Pak, Ji-Yeong
Yeo, Gi-Tae
Oh, Se-Woong
Yang, Zaili
description •Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance. There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660058446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753514002173</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660058446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAQgDOARCm8AJNHloQ7x84PYkEVf6ISDGW2HOciXKVxsNMKNl6D1-NJSFRmxHTDfd9J90XRGUKCgNnFOgnB2IQDigTKBCA_iGZQchnnMpVH0XEIawDANMNZtHx2fmBBNzR8MNrpdqsH6zrWeLdhmhndD9p2359fgfXkQ09msDu6ZKtXYo_Ok-4YvY8bS52hk-iw0W2g0985j15ub1aL-3j5dPewuF7GRiAMcUqoi4qgKVLEEjPKc1GnlHGqqkYWnDhCzXkhqrqShlBIKQ1PC-C5pFpiOo_O93d77962FAa1scFQ2-qO3DYozDIAWQiR_QMVOUBRchhRvkeNdyF4alTv7Ub7D4WgprJqraayaiqroFRj2VG62ks0_ruz5NVITC1q68dWqnb2L_0HP6CEKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1647008920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Pak, Ji-Yeong ; Yeo, Gi-Tae ; Oh, Se-Woong ; Yang, Zaili</creator><creatorcontrib>Pak, Ji-Yeong ; Yeo, Gi-Tae ; Oh, Se-Woong ; Yang, Zaili</creatorcontrib><description>•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance. There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climatology ; Expert knowledge ; Fuzzy ; Fuzzy AHP ; Fuzzy logic ; Maritime risk ; Maritime safety ; Maritime transport ; Port safety factors ; Ports ; Quantitative analysis ; Safety ; Safety evaluation ; Ships ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2015-02, Vol.72, p.172-181</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pak, Ji-Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Gi-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Se-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zaili</creatorcontrib><title>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</title><title>Safety science</title><description>•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance. There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.</description><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Expert knowledge</subject><subject>Fuzzy</subject><subject>Fuzzy AHP</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Maritime risk</subject><subject>Maritime safety</subject><subject>Maritime transport</subject><subject>Port safety factors</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety evaluation</subject><subject>Ships</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAQgDOARCm8AJNHloQ7x84PYkEVf6ISDGW2HOciXKVxsNMKNl6D1-NJSFRmxHTDfd9J90XRGUKCgNnFOgnB2IQDigTKBCA_iGZQchnnMpVH0XEIawDANMNZtHx2fmBBNzR8MNrpdqsH6zrWeLdhmhndD9p2359fgfXkQ09msDu6ZKtXYo_Ok-4YvY8bS52hk-iw0W2g0985j15ub1aL-3j5dPewuF7GRiAMcUqoi4qgKVLEEjPKc1GnlHGqqkYWnDhCzXkhqrqShlBIKQ1PC-C5pFpiOo_O93d77962FAa1scFQ2-qO3DYozDIAWQiR_QMVOUBRchhRvkeNdyF4alTv7Ub7D4WgprJqraayaiqroFRj2VG62ks0_ruz5NVITC1q68dWqnb2L_0HP6CEKw</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Pak, Ji-Yeong</creator><creator>Yeo, Gi-Tae</creator><creator>Oh, Se-Woong</creator><creator>Yang, Zaili</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</title><author>Pak, Ji-Yeong ; Yeo, Gi-Tae ; Oh, Se-Woong ; Yang, Zaili</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Expert knowledge</topic><topic>Fuzzy</topic><topic>Fuzzy AHP</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Maritime risk</topic><topic>Maritime safety</topic><topic>Maritime transport</topic><topic>Port safety factors</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety evaluation</topic><topic>Ships</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pak, Ji-Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Gi-Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Se-Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zaili</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pak, Ji-Yeong</au><au>Yeo, Gi-Tae</au><au>Oh, Se-Woong</au><au>Yang, Zaili</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>172</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>172-181</pages><issn>0925-7535</issn><abstract>•Identification of relevant factors influencing navigational safety in ports.•Development of a new approach to evaluate safety perception based on fuzzy AHP.•Quantitative safety evaluation of Korean ports using first hand real data.•Demonstration of advantages of the new model through case studies.•Provide ports a benchmark for improving their safety performance. There are many factors affecting navigational safety in ports, including weather, the characteristics of the channels and vessel types, etc. This paper aims to identify the factors influencing navigational safety in ports and to analyze the extent to which such factors affect the safety of ports from the perspective of ship captains through a real case study. A quantitative analysis is carried out using the data collected from 21 captains who have over 10years experience in operating ships individually. The identified factors indicate risk implications in ports. A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate the importance of the factors and to rank the safety levels of the targeted ports in Korea from a captain’s perspective. Consequently, among Busan, Ulsan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Mokpo, Busan is evaluated by captains as the safest port, while Mokpo is the most risky. The research also reveals that it is applicable to use domain expert knowledge when historical failure data is unavailable or difficult to access to evaluate port safety. The result shows great research significance in terms of providing relevant stakeholders, such as port authorities and shipping companies, with an insight into port safety performance and thus facilitating the development of the associated risk control measures.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-7535
ispartof Safety science, 2015-02, Vol.72, p.172-181
issn 0925-7535
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660058446
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Climatology
Expert knowledge
Fuzzy
Fuzzy AHP
Fuzzy logic
Maritime risk
Maritime safety
Maritime transport
Port safety factors
Ports
Quantitative analysis
Safety
Safety evaluation
Ships
Weather
title Port safety evaluation from a captain’s perspective: The Korean experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Port%20safety%20evaluation%20from%20a%20captain%E2%80%99s%20perspective:%20The%20Korean%20experience&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Pak,%20Ji-Yeong&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=172-181&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660058446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-3e1a8be0f8311916e774d3e62ebbf582e210d2284bdb5ce14555c2380275ed513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1647008920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true