Loading…
Competing Effects of Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate Ions on the Removal of Fluoride by a Modified Zeolitic Tuff
Natural zeolitic tuff was modified with FeCl 3 solution for the removal of fluoride, and the effect of chloride, nitrate, and sulfate ions was examined on fluoride sorption from solutions and drinking water. The unmodified zeolitic tuff (Z) and the iron-modified zeolitic tuff (Fe(III)-Z) were charac...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2015-01, Vol.226 (1), p.1-15, Article 2236 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3 |
| container_end_page | 15 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Water, air, and soil pollution |
| container_volume | 226 |
| creator | Velazquez-Peña, G. C. Solache-Ríos, M. Martínez-Miranda, V. |
| description | Natural zeolitic tuff was modified with FeCl
3
solution for the removal of fluoride, and the effect of chloride, nitrate, and sulfate ions was examined on fluoride sorption from solutions and drinking water. The unmodified zeolitic tuff (Z) and the iron-modified zeolitic tuff (Fe(III)-Z) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. The elemental composition, the specific surface area, and the point of zero charge of the zeolitic material were also determined. The fluoride adsorption was carried out in a batch system considering the effect of contact time, the initial concentration of fluoride ions, and the effect of other anions naturally present in the drinking water. The kinetic and isotherm results were adjusted to the pseudo-second-order and Freundlich models, respectively, which indicated that the sorption mechanism was chemisorption on a heterogeneous material. The fluoride sorption capacity was higher in solutions (2.7 mg/g) than in drinking water (0.41 mg/g), and this could be attributed to the presence of other anions. Overall, the presence of chloride ions significantly diminished the fluoride adsorption capacity, while the presence of nitrate and sulfate ions did not show any significant effect; the anion removal efficiency by Fe(III)-Z followed the order F
−
> > Cl
−
> NO
3
−
> SO
4
2−
. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11270-014-2236-y |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660084224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A435385175</galeid><sourcerecordid>A435385175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9Ae4Cblw49eR7ZlkurRaqgtaNm5CbnNymzEyuyUzh_ntzHRciCE0W-eB5wjnhbZrXFM4pgH5fKGUaWqCiZYyr9vik2VCpect6zp42GwDRt6rX_fPmRSn3UEff6U2Ttmk84BynPbkMAd1cSApkezekHD2-I5_jnO1cN3by5NsyhHog12mq2ETmOyRfcUwPdjhZV8Py2yK7I7HkU_IxRPTkB6YhztGR2yWEl82zYIeCr_6sZ833q8vb7cf25suH6-3FTeuEgrmlXuy4t1I6zznjvUCpg1ah4xbBeYay9yAAPdeUMSd5UDxo0KAoo3KH_Kx5u757yOnngmU2YywOh8FOmJZiqFIAnWBMPAIVGphkSlf0zT_ofVryVBupFFeKMeAn6nyl9nZAE6eQ6h-6Oj2O0aUJQ6z3F4JL3kmq5aMF0Ix1soMq0FVwOZWSMZhDjqPNR0PBnPJg1jyYmgdzyoM5VoetTqnstMf8V-3_lX4B-lS1Ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1636622037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competing Effects of Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate Ions on the Removal of Fluoride by a Modified Zeolitic Tuff</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Velazquez-Peña, G. C. ; Solache-Ríos, M. ; Martínez-Miranda, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Velazquez-Peña, G. C. ; Solache-Ríos, M. ; Martínez-Miranda, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural zeolitic tuff was modified with FeCl
3
solution for the removal of fluoride, and the effect of chloride, nitrate, and sulfate ions was examined on fluoride sorption from solutions and drinking water. The unmodified zeolitic tuff (Z) and the iron-modified zeolitic tuff (Fe(III)-Z) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. The elemental composition, the specific surface area, and the point of zero charge of the zeolitic material were also determined. The fluoride adsorption was carried out in a batch system considering the effect of contact time, the initial concentration of fluoride ions, and the effect of other anions naturally present in the drinking water. The kinetic and isotherm results were adjusted to the pseudo-second-order and Freundlich models, respectively, which indicated that the sorption mechanism was chemisorption on a heterogeneous material. The fluoride sorption capacity was higher in solutions (2.7 mg/g) than in drinking water (0.41 mg/g), and this could be attributed to the presence of other anions. Overall, the presence of chloride ions significantly diminished the fluoride adsorption capacity, while the presence of nitrate and sulfate ions did not show any significant effect; the anion removal efficiency by Fe(III)-Z followed the order F
−
> > Cl
−
> NO
3
−
> SO
4
2−
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11270-014-2236-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adsorbents ; Adsorption ; Aluminum ; Analysis ; Anions ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Carbon ; Chemical composition ; Chloride ; Chlorides ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Diffraction ; Drinking water ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Efficiency ; Electron microscopes ; Environment ; Environmental cleanup ; Environmental monitoring ; Experiments ; Fluorides ; Hydrogeology ; Ions ; Iron ; Mathematical models ; Nitrates ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Sorption ; Studies ; Sulfates ; Surface chemistry ; Tuff ; Volcanic ash, tuff, etc ; Volcanic rocks ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; X-ray diffraction ; X-rays ; Zeolites</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 2015-01, Vol.226 (1), p.1-15, Article 2236</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1636622037/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1636622037?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Velazquez-Peña, G. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solache-Ríos, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Miranda, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Competing Effects of Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate Ions on the Removal of Fluoride by a Modified Zeolitic Tuff</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><addtitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</addtitle><description>Natural zeolitic tuff was modified with FeCl
3
solution for the removal of fluoride, and the effect of chloride, nitrate, and sulfate ions was examined on fluoride sorption from solutions and drinking water. The unmodified zeolitic tuff (Z) and the iron-modified zeolitic tuff (Fe(III)-Z) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. The elemental composition, the specific surface area, and the point of zero charge of the zeolitic material were also determined. The fluoride adsorption was carried out in a batch system considering the effect of contact time, the initial concentration of fluoride ions, and the effect of other anions naturally present in the drinking water. The kinetic and isotherm results were adjusted to the pseudo-second-order and Freundlich models, respectively, which indicated that the sorption mechanism was chemisorption on a heterogeneous material. The fluoride sorption capacity was higher in solutions (2.7 mg/g) than in drinking water (0.41 mg/g), and this could be attributed to the presence of other anions. Overall, the presence of chloride ions significantly diminished the fluoride adsorption capacity, while the presence of nitrate and sulfate ions did not show any significant effect; the anion removal efficiency by Fe(III)-Z followed the order F
−
> > Cl
−
> NO
3
−
> SO
4
2−
.</description><subject>Adsorbents</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anions</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chloride</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Diffraction</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electron microscopes</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental cleanup</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Surface chemistry</subject><subject>Tuff</subject><subject>Volcanic ash, tuff, etc</subject><subject>Volcanic rocks</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><subject>Zeolites</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9Ae4Cblw49eR7ZlkurRaqgtaNm5CbnNymzEyuyUzh_ntzHRciCE0W-eB5wjnhbZrXFM4pgH5fKGUaWqCiZYyr9vik2VCpect6zp42GwDRt6rX_fPmRSn3UEff6U2Ttmk84BynPbkMAd1cSApkezekHD2-I5_jnO1cN3by5NsyhHog12mq2ETmOyRfcUwPdjhZV8Py2yK7I7HkU_IxRPTkB6YhztGR2yWEl82zYIeCr_6sZ833q8vb7cf25suH6-3FTeuEgrmlXuy4t1I6zznjvUCpg1ah4xbBeYay9yAAPdeUMSd5UDxo0KAoo3KH_Kx5u757yOnngmU2YywOh8FOmJZiqFIAnWBMPAIVGphkSlf0zT_ofVryVBupFFeKMeAn6nyl9nZAE6eQ6h-6Oj2O0aUJQ6z3F4JL3kmq5aMF0Ix1soMq0FVwOZWSMZhDjqPNR0PBnPJg1jyYmgdzyoM5VoetTqnstMf8V-3_lX4B-lS1Ww</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Velazquez-Peña, G. C.</creator><creator>Solache-Ríos, M.</creator><creator>Martínez-Miranda, V.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Competing Effects of Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate Ions on the Removal of Fluoride by a Modified Zeolitic Tuff</title><author>Velazquez-Peña, G. C. ; Solache-Ríos, M. ; Martínez-Miranda, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adsorbents</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anions</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chloride</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Diffraction</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electron microscopes</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental cleanup</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Surface chemistry</topic><topic>Tuff</topic><topic>Volcanic ash, tuff, etc</topic><topic>Volcanic rocks</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><topic>Zeolites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Velazquez-Peña, G. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solache-Ríos, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Miranda, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Velazquez-Peña, G. C.</au><au>Solache-Ríos, M.</au><au>Martínez-Miranda, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competing Effects of Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate Ions on the Removal of Fluoride by a Modified Zeolitic Tuff</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><stitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>226</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><artnum>2236</artnum><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><abstract>Natural zeolitic tuff was modified with FeCl
3
solution for the removal of fluoride, and the effect of chloride, nitrate, and sulfate ions was examined on fluoride sorption from solutions and drinking water. The unmodified zeolitic tuff (Z) and the iron-modified zeolitic tuff (Fe(III)-Z) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. The elemental composition, the specific surface area, and the point of zero charge of the zeolitic material were also determined. The fluoride adsorption was carried out in a batch system considering the effect of contact time, the initial concentration of fluoride ions, and the effect of other anions naturally present in the drinking water. The kinetic and isotherm results were adjusted to the pseudo-second-order and Freundlich models, respectively, which indicated that the sorption mechanism was chemisorption on a heterogeneous material. The fluoride sorption capacity was higher in solutions (2.7 mg/g) than in drinking water (0.41 mg/g), and this could be attributed to the presence of other anions. Overall, the presence of chloride ions significantly diminished the fluoride adsorption capacity, while the presence of nitrate and sulfate ions did not show any significant effect; the anion removal efficiency by Fe(III)-Z followed the order F
−
> > Cl
−
> NO
3
−
> SO
4
2−
.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11270-014-2236-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0049-6979 |
| ispartof | Water, air, and soil pollution, 2015-01, Vol.226 (1), p.1-15, Article 2236 |
| issn | 0049-6979 1573-2932 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660084224 |
| source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
| subjects | Adsorbents Adsorption Aluminum Analysis Anions Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Carbon Chemical composition Chloride Chlorides Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Diffraction Drinking water Earth and Environmental Science Efficiency Electron microscopes Environment Environmental cleanup Environmental monitoring Experiments Fluorides Hydrogeology Ions Iron Mathematical models Nitrates Scanning electron microscopy Soil Science & Conservation Sorption Studies Sulfates Surface chemistry Tuff Volcanic ash, tuff, etc Volcanic rocks Water Quality/Water Pollution X-ray diffraction X-rays Zeolites |
| title | Competing Effects of Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate Ions on the Removal of Fluoride by a Modified Zeolitic Tuff |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A25%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competing%20Effects%20of%20Chloride,%20Nitrate,%20and%20Sulfate%20Ions%20on%20the%20Removal%20of%20Fluoride%20by%20a%20Modified%20Zeolitic%20Tuff&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=Velazquez-Pe%C3%B1a,%20G.%20C.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=226&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.artnum=2236&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11270-014-2236-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA435385175%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-1d4b3da55cd332394e57f76f83ae0cd2e59d040ed37122c53f63f707061215be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1636622037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A435385175&rfr_iscdi=true |