The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour

The motor-evoked potential (MEP) elicited in peripheral muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human motor cortex is one of the hallmark measures for non-invasive quantification of cortical and spinal excitability in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. In the present article, we di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental brain research 2015-03, Vol.233 (3), p.679-689
Main Authors: Bestmann, Sven, Krakauer, John W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Electroencephalography
Electromyography
Evoked potentials
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Humans
Learning - physiology
Methods
Motor Activity - physiology
Motor Cortex - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Neurology
Neurosciences
Physiology
Psychological research
Review
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The motor-evoked potential (MEP) elicited in peripheral muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human motor cortex is one of the hallmark measures for non-invasive quantification of cortical and spinal excitability in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. In the present article, we distinguish three main uses for MEPs in studies of behaviour: for understanding execution and performance of actions, as markers of physiological change in the motor system, and as read-out of upstream processes influencing the motor system. Common to all three approaches is the assumption that different experimental manipulations act on the balance of excitatory and inhibitory pre-synaptic (inter)neurons at the stimulation site; this in turn contributes to levels of (post-synaptic) excitability of cortico-spinal output projections, which ultimately determines the size of MEPs recorded from peripheral muscles. We discuss the types of inference one can draw from human MEP measures given that the detailed physiological underpinnings of MEPs elicited by TMS are complex and remain incompletely understood. Awareness of the different mechanistic assumptions underlying different uses of MEPs can help inform both study design and interpretation of results obtained from human MEP studies of behaviour.
ISSN:0014-4819
1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-014-4183-7