Loading…
Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? a correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function
Though biodiversity can have an effect on biological control of pests, there is debate about whether a single species or a more complex assemblage of natural enemies will exert better control of the pest population. We explore the relationship between numbers of different taxa of natural enemies in...
Saved in:
Published in: | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2015-02, Vol.60 (1), p.37-45 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23 |
container_end_page | 45 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Paredes, D Cayuela, L Gurr, G. M Campos , M |
description | Though biodiversity can have an effect on biological control of pests, there is debate about whether a single species or a more complex assemblage of natural enemies will exert better control of the pest population. We explore the relationship between numbers of different taxa of natural enemies in an olive grove to identify cases of significant positive and negative correlations between enemy taxa. Integrating herbivore data we identified enemy taxa and assemblages that were associated with low numbers of olive pests. Overall, single species such as Anthocoris nemoralis, or relatively simple predator assemblages, such as that formed by the spider families Araneidae and Liniphiidae, and the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, were associated with better biological control than complex assemblages, where intraguild predation and other trophic interactions might hamper the effectiveness of enemies. For a Lepidopteran pest with a complex life cycle, the single best predator taxon was markedly poorer at suppression than the most effective assemblage. In contrast, a Hemipteran pest with a simple life cycle was controlled nearly as well by the single best predator taxon as by the most effective assemblage. Statistical approaches offer good scope to identify optimal aspects of biodiversity to maximise ecosystem services such as biological control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10526-014-9620-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660407029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660407029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1jAQxosouK5-AE8GvHjpmsnf5iSyqCsseFj3HNLstHZpk9dMK7zf3pR6EA-eZmB-z8MzPE3zGvgVcG7fE3AtTMtBtc4I3ronzQVoK9tOqO5p3WVnWgMKnjcviB551WjdXTTpbkrjjKxHWhmdME5ILBeWwrqVMDNMuJxZIMKln8OI9IEFFnMpOId1yqki4XQqOcQfbM1sSr-q0TTWWxoZxkxnWnFhw5bijr9sng1hJnz1Z142958_fb--aW-_ffl6_fG2jdLKtR1cF5WJzoHGXnRGOa17kC4YY6SFh2j7YM1D0NJqPgSNhveV7CEOaoAg5GXz7vCt0X5uNZJfJoo4zyFh3siDMVxxy4Wr6Nt_0Me8lfrYTqlOSOGUrRQcVCyZqODgT2VaQjl74H5vwB8N-NqA3xvwu7M4NFTZNGL5y_k_ojeHaAjZh7FM5O_vBAfNOTipDMjfEyOTZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1648232947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? a correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Paredes, D ; Cayuela, L ; Gurr, G. M ; Campos , M</creator><creatorcontrib>Paredes, D ; Cayuela, L ; Gurr, G. M ; Campos , M</creatorcontrib><description>Though biodiversity can have an effect on biological control of pests, there is debate about whether a single species or a more complex assemblage of natural enemies will exert better control of the pest population. We explore the relationship between numbers of different taxa of natural enemies in an olive grove to identify cases of significant positive and negative correlations between enemy taxa. Integrating herbivore data we identified enemy taxa and assemblages that were associated with low numbers of olive pests. Overall, single species such as Anthocoris nemoralis, or relatively simple predator assemblages, such as that formed by the spider families Araneidae and Liniphiidae, and the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, were associated with better biological control than complex assemblages, where intraguild predation and other trophic interactions might hamper the effectiveness of enemies. For a Lepidopteran pest with a complex life cycle, the single best predator taxon was markedly poorer at suppression than the most effective assemblage. In contrast, a Hemipteran pest with a simple life cycle was controlled nearly as well by the single best predator taxon as by the most effective assemblage. Statistical approaches offer good scope to identify optimal aspects of biodiversity to maximise ecosystem services such as biological control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10526-014-9620-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal Biochemistry ; Animal Ecology ; Anthocoris nemoralis ; Araneae ; Araneidae ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Biological control ; Biological effects ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chrysoperla ; Chrysoperla carnea ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Entomology ; Hemiptera ; herbivores ; Lepidoptera ; Life cycles ; Life Sciences ; Natural enemies ; Olea ; olives ; Pest control ; Pests ; Plant Pathology ; Predation ; Predators ; Taxa ; Trophic relationships ; Vegetation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2015-02, Vol.60 (1), p.37-45</ispartof><rights>International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2014</rights><rights>International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paredes, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayuela, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurr, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos , M</creatorcontrib><title>Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? a correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function</title><title>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>BioControl</addtitle><description>Though biodiversity can have an effect on biological control of pests, there is debate about whether a single species or a more complex assemblage of natural enemies will exert better control of the pest population. We explore the relationship between numbers of different taxa of natural enemies in an olive grove to identify cases of significant positive and negative correlations between enemy taxa. Integrating herbivore data we identified enemy taxa and assemblages that were associated with low numbers of olive pests. Overall, single species such as Anthocoris nemoralis, or relatively simple predator assemblages, such as that formed by the spider families Araneidae and Liniphiidae, and the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, were associated with better biological control than complex assemblages, where intraguild predation and other trophic interactions might hamper the effectiveness of enemies. For a Lepidopteran pest with a complex life cycle, the single best predator taxon was markedly poorer at suppression than the most effective assemblage. In contrast, a Hemipteran pest with a simple life cycle was controlled nearly as well by the single best predator taxon as by the most effective assemblage. Statistical approaches offer good scope to identify optimal aspects of biodiversity to maximise ecosystem services such as biological control.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Anthocoris nemoralis</subject><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Araneidae</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chrysoperla</subject><subject>Chrysoperla carnea</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Hemiptera</subject><subject>herbivores</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Olea</subject><subject>olives</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1386-6141</issn><issn>1573-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-L1jAQxosouK5-AE8GvHjpmsnf5iSyqCsseFj3HNLstHZpk9dMK7zf3pR6EA-eZmB-z8MzPE3zGvgVcG7fE3AtTMtBtc4I3ronzQVoK9tOqO5p3WVnWgMKnjcviB551WjdXTTpbkrjjKxHWhmdME5ILBeWwrqVMDNMuJxZIMKln8OI9IEFFnMpOId1yqki4XQqOcQfbM1sSr-q0TTWWxoZxkxnWnFhw5bijr9sng1hJnz1Z142958_fb--aW-_ffl6_fG2jdLKtR1cF5WJzoHGXnRGOa17kC4YY6SFh2j7YM1D0NJqPgSNhveV7CEOaoAg5GXz7vCt0X5uNZJfJoo4zyFh3siDMVxxy4Wr6Nt_0Me8lfrYTqlOSOGUrRQcVCyZqODgT2VaQjl74H5vwB8N-NqA3xvwu7M4NFTZNGL5y_k_ojeHaAjZh7FM5O_vBAfNOTipDMjfEyOTZg</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Paredes, D</creator><creator>Cayuela, L</creator><creator>Gurr, G. M</creator><creator>Campos , M</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? a correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function</title><author>Paredes, D ; Cayuela, L ; Gurr, G. M ; Campos , M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Anthocoris nemoralis</topic><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Araneidae</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chrysoperla</topic><topic>Chrysoperla carnea</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Hemiptera</topic><topic>herbivores</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Olea</topic><topic>olives</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paredes, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayuela, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurr, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos , M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paredes, D</au><au>Cayuela, L</au><au>Gurr, G. M</au><au>Campos , M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? a correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function</atitle><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle><stitle>BioControl</stitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>1386-6141</issn><eissn>1573-8248</eissn><abstract>Though biodiversity can have an effect on biological control of pests, there is debate about whether a single species or a more complex assemblage of natural enemies will exert better control of the pest population. We explore the relationship between numbers of different taxa of natural enemies in an olive grove to identify cases of significant positive and negative correlations between enemy taxa. Integrating herbivore data we identified enemy taxa and assemblages that were associated with low numbers of olive pests. Overall, single species such as Anthocoris nemoralis, or relatively simple predator assemblages, such as that formed by the spider families Araneidae and Liniphiidae, and the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, were associated with better biological control than complex assemblages, where intraguild predation and other trophic interactions might hamper the effectiveness of enemies. For a Lepidopteran pest with a complex life cycle, the single best predator taxon was markedly poorer at suppression than the most effective assemblage. In contrast, a Hemipteran pest with a simple life cycle was controlled nearly as well by the single best predator taxon as by the most effective assemblage. Statistical approaches offer good scope to identify optimal aspects of biodiversity to maximise ecosystem services such as biological control.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10526-014-9620-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-6141 |
ispartof | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2015-02, Vol.60 (1), p.37-45 |
issn | 1386-6141 1573-8248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660407029 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Agriculture Animal Biochemistry Animal Ecology Anthocoris nemoralis Araneae Araneidae Behavioral Sciences Biodiversity Biological control Biological effects Biomedical and Life Sciences Chrysoperla Chrysoperla carnea Ecological function Ecosystem services Ecosystems Entomology Hemiptera herbivores Lepidoptera Life cycles Life Sciences Natural enemies Olea olives Pest control Pests Plant Pathology Predation Predators Taxa Trophic relationships Vegetation Wildlife management |
title | Single best species or natural enemy assemblages? a correlational approach to investigating ecosystem function |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20best%20species%20or%20natural%20enemy%20assemblages?%20a%20correlational%20approach%20to%20investigating%20ecosystem%20function&rft.jtitle=BioControl%20(Dordrecht,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Paredes,%20D&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=1386-6141&rft.eissn=1573-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10526-014-9620-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660407029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f98c46c9915eb2864955b139a666371dc7ba76da53750fa5e60b5ebb1cf4f1a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1648232947&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |