Interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults

• Published in: Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015-02 (2), p.CD009651-CD009651
• Main Authors: Sayum Filho, Jorge, Lenza, Mário, Teixeira de Carvalho, Rogerio, Pires, Osvaldo G N, Cohen, Moisés, Belloti, João Carlos
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Fracture Fixation - instrumentation; Fracture Fixation - methods; Fractures, Bone - surgery; Fractures, Comminuted - surgery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patella - injuries; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
• ISSN: 1469-493X
• DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009651.pub2

Fractures of the patella (kneecap) account for around 1% of all human fractures. The treatment of these fractures can be surgical or conservative (such as immobilisation with a cast or brace). There are many different surgical and conservative interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults. To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions (surgical and conservative) for treating fractures of the patella in adults. We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (2 May 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2014, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1946 to April Week 4 2014), Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (2 May 2014), Embase (1980 to 2014 Week 17), LILACS (1982 to 2 May 2014), trial registers and references lists of articles. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that evaluated any surgical or conservative intervention for treating adults with fractures of the patella were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were patient-rated knee function and knee pain, and major adverse outcomes. At least two review authors independently selected eligible trials, assessed risk of bias and cross-checked data extraction. Where appropriate, results of comparable trials were pooled. We included five small trials involving 169 participants with patella fractures. Participant age ranged from 16 to 76 years. There were 68 females and 100 males; the gender of one participant was not reported. Two trials were conducted in China and one each in Finland, Mexico and Turkey.All five trials compared different surgical interventions. Two trials compared biodegradable versus metallic implants for treating displaced patella fractures; one trial compared patellectomy with advancement of vastus medialis obliquus versus simple patellectomy for treating comminuted patella fractures; and two trials compared percutaneous osteosynthesis (both procedures were 'novel' and one used a new device) versus open surgery for treating displaced patella fractures. All the trials had design flaws, such as lack of assessor blinding, which put them at high risk of bias, potentially limiting the reliability of their findings. No trial reported on health-related quality of life, return to previous activity or cosmetic appearance.Very low quality evidence from two trials (48 participants) comparing biodegradable versus metallic implants indicated little difference between the two in