Loading…

Mass-like peripheral zone enhancement on CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer

Purpose To determine whether focal peripheral zone enhancement on routine venous-phase CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer. Materials and methods IRB approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Forty-three pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Abdominal imaging 2015-03, Vol.40 (3), p.560-570
Main Authors: Glazer, D. I., Davenport, M. S., Khalatbari, S., Cohan, R. H., Ellis, J. H., Caoili, E. M., Stein, E. B., Childress, J. C., Masch, W. R., Brown, J. M., Mollard, B. J., Montgomery, J. S., Palapattu, G. S., Francis, I. R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To determine whether focal peripheral zone enhancement on routine venous-phase CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer. Materials and methods IRB approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Forty-three patients with higher-grade prostate cancer (≥Gleason 4 + 3) and 96 with histology-confirmed lower-grade (≤Gleason 3 + 4 [ n  = 47]) or absent ( n  = 49) prostate cancer imaged with venous-phase CT comprised the study population. CT images were reviewed by ten blinded radiologists (5 attendings, 5 residents) who scored peripheral zone enhancement on a scale of 1 (benign) to 5 (malignant). Mass-like peripheral zone enhancement was considered malignant. Likelihood ratios (LR) and specificities were calculated. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results Scores of “5” were strongly predictive of higher-grade prostate cancer (pooled LR+ 9.6 [95% CI 5.8–15.8]) with rare false positives (pooled specificity: 0.98 [942/960, 95% CI 0.98–0.99]; all 10 readers had specificity ≥95%). Attending scores of “5” were more predictive than resident scores of “5” (LR+: 14.7 [95% CI 5.8–37.2] vs. 7.6 [95% CI 4.2–13.7]) with similar specificity (0.99 [475/480, 95% CI 0.98–1.00] vs. 0.97 [467/480, 95% CI 0.96–0.99]). Significant predictors of an assigned score of “5” included presence of a peripheral zone mass ( p  
ISSN:0942-8925
2366-004X
1432-0509
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-014-0233-7