Loading…
Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs
We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2015-01, Vol.144 (1), p.34-47 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723 |
container_end_page | 47 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 34 |
container_title | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Conner, Mary M Bennett, Stephen N Saunders, W. Carl Bouwes, Nicolaas |
description | We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00028487.2014.963254 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660431112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660431112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEqXlDZDwkcsu48R2kt7KsoWiVhyyPVuOM15MnXixk6K98Q5IPCBPgkOKxLGnGdv_Nxr5y7JXFNYUKngLAHnFqnKdA2XrWhQ5Z0-yE8pZtaoEr5_-1z_PXsT4NRG8FNVJ9mvj-4MKNvqBeEN2wbbTqMKRNFO4t_fKkW0cba9GjPN7MyK6L6g6MkU77MnGh17pu98_fn7yzh1TbbDFQNTQkXcq3KX2xnfo4jm56g_OajVaP0RifCCNmm_SkK1JxzH-hd5jtPshnmXPjHIRXz7U0-z2crvbfFxdf_5wtbm4XumC12yFuixbWlZcGFqhyRFVm2NVg64FUNEWKSCExhK4Qux4pw0ThnHBuNFdmRen2Ztl7iH4bxPGUfY2anRODeinKKkQwApK6RxlS1QHH2NAIw8hfUw4Sgpy1iD_aZCzBrloSNj5gn23Do-PYuTu4rIBKGb49QIb5aXaJ03ytklJAUChgLTVH6QsmVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660431112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Conner, Mary M ; Bennett, Stephen N ; Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas</creator><creatorcontrib>Conner, Mary M ; Bennett, Stephen N ; Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2014.963254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>autumn ; cost effectiveness ; fish ; Freshwater ; infrastructure ; juveniles ; migratory behavior ; Oncorhynchus mykiss ; rivers ; seasonal variation ; spring ; summer ; survival rate ; watersheds ; winter</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2015-01, Vol.144 (1), p.34-47</ispartof><rights>2015 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conner, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Stephen N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014</description><subject>autumn</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>migratory behavior</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus mykiss</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>survival rate</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEqXlDZDwkcsu48R2kt7KsoWiVhyyPVuOM15MnXixk6K98Q5IPCBPgkOKxLGnGdv_Nxr5y7JXFNYUKngLAHnFqnKdA2XrWhQ5Z0-yE8pZtaoEr5_-1z_PXsT4NRG8FNVJ9mvj-4MKNvqBeEN2wbbTqMKRNFO4t_fKkW0cba9GjPN7MyK6L6g6MkU77MnGh17pu98_fn7yzh1TbbDFQNTQkXcq3KX2xnfo4jm56g_OajVaP0RifCCNmm_SkK1JxzH-hd5jtPshnmXPjHIRXz7U0-z2crvbfFxdf_5wtbm4XumC12yFuixbWlZcGFqhyRFVm2NVg64FUNEWKSCExhK4Qux4pw0ThnHBuNFdmRen2Ztl7iH4bxPGUfY2anRODeinKKkQwApK6RxlS1QHH2NAIw8hfUw4Sgpy1iD_aZCzBrloSNj5gn23Do-PYuTu4rIBKGb49QIb5aXaJ03ytklJAUChgLTVH6QsmVk</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Conner, Mary M</creator><creator>Bennett, Stephen N</creator><creator>Saunders, W. Carl</creator><creator>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</title><author>Conner, Mary M ; Bennett, Stephen N ; Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>autumn</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>migratory behavior</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>survival rate</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conner, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Stephen N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conner, Mary M</au><au>Bennett, Stephen N</au><au>Saunders, W. Carl</au><au>Bouwes, Nicolaas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>34-47</pages><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><abstract>We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00028487.2014.963254</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1548-8659 |
ispartof | Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2015-01, Vol.144 (1), p.34-47 |
issn | 1548-8659 0002-8487 1548-8659 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660431112 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | autumn cost effectiveness fish Freshwater infrastructure juveniles migratory behavior Oncorhynchus mykiss rivers seasonal variation spring summer survival rate watersheds winter |
title | Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A39%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Tributary%20Survival%20Estimates%20of%20Steelhead%20using%20Cormack%E2%80%93Jolly%E2%80%93Seber%20and%20Barker%20Models:%20Implications%20for%20Sampling%20Efforts%20and%20Designs&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Conner,%20Mary%20M&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=34-47&rft.issn=1548-8659&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00028487.2014.963254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660431112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660431112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |