Loading…

Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs

We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) 2015-01, Vol.144 (1), p.34-47
Main Authors: Conner, Mary M, Bennett, Stephen N, Saunders, W. Carl, Bouwes, Nicolaas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)
container_volume 144
creator Conner, Mary M
Bennett, Stephen N
Saunders, W. Carl
Bouwes, Nicolaas
description We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00028487.2014.963254
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660431112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660431112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEqXlDZDwkcsu48R2kt7KsoWiVhyyPVuOM15MnXixk6K98Q5IPCBPgkOKxLGnGdv_Nxr5y7JXFNYUKngLAHnFqnKdA2XrWhQ5Z0-yE8pZtaoEr5_-1z_PXsT4NRG8FNVJ9mvj-4MKNvqBeEN2wbbTqMKRNFO4t_fKkW0cba9GjPN7MyK6L6g6MkU77MnGh17pu98_fn7yzh1TbbDFQNTQkXcq3KX2xnfo4jm56g_OajVaP0RifCCNmm_SkK1JxzH-hd5jtPshnmXPjHIRXz7U0-z2crvbfFxdf_5wtbm4XumC12yFuixbWlZcGFqhyRFVm2NVg64FUNEWKSCExhK4Qux4pw0ThnHBuNFdmRen2Ztl7iH4bxPGUfY2anRODeinKKkQwApK6RxlS1QHH2NAIw8hfUw4Sgpy1iD_aZCzBrloSNj5gn23Do-PYuTu4rIBKGb49QIb5aXaJ03ytklJAUChgLTVH6QsmVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660431112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Conner, Mary M ; Bennett, Stephen N ; Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas</creator><creatorcontrib>Conner, Mary M ; Bennett, Stephen N ; Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2014.963254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>autumn ; cost effectiveness ; fish ; Freshwater ; infrastructure ; juveniles ; migratory behavior ; Oncorhynchus mykiss ; rivers ; seasonal variation ; spring ; summer ; survival rate ; watersheds ; winter</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2015-01, Vol.144 (1), p.34-47</ispartof><rights>2015 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conner, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Stephen N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</title><title>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</title><description>We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014</description><subject>autumn</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>migratory behavior</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus mykiss</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>survival rate</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><issn>1548-8659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEqXlDZDwkcsu48R2kt7KsoWiVhyyPVuOM15MnXixk6K98Q5IPCBPgkOKxLGnGdv_Nxr5y7JXFNYUKngLAHnFqnKdA2XrWhQ5Z0-yE8pZtaoEr5_-1z_PXsT4NRG8FNVJ9mvj-4MKNvqBeEN2wbbTqMKRNFO4t_fKkW0cba9GjPN7MyK6L6g6MkU77MnGh17pu98_fn7yzh1TbbDFQNTQkXcq3KX2xnfo4jm56g_OajVaP0RifCCNmm_SkK1JxzH-hd5jtPshnmXPjHIRXz7U0-z2crvbfFxdf_5wtbm4XumC12yFuixbWlZcGFqhyRFVm2NVg64FUNEWKSCExhK4Qux4pw0ThnHBuNFdmRen2Ztl7iH4bxPGUfY2anRODeinKKkQwApK6RxlS1QHH2NAIw8hfUw4Sgpy1iD_aZCzBrloSNj5gn23Do-PYuTu4rIBKGb49QIb5aXaJ03ytklJAUChgLTVH6QsmVk</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Conner, Mary M</creator><creator>Bennett, Stephen N</creator><creator>Saunders, W. Carl</creator><creator>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</title><author>Conner, Mary M ; Bennett, Stephen N ; Saunders, W. Carl ; Bouwes, Nicolaas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>autumn</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>migratory behavior</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus mykiss</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>survival rate</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conner, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Stephen N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, W. Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwes, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conner, Mary M</au><au>Bennett, Stephen N</au><au>Saunders, W. Carl</au><au>Bouwes, Nicolaas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900)</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>34-47</pages><issn>1548-8659</issn><issn>0002-8487</issn><eissn>1548-8659</eissn><abstract>We conducted simulations to compare the precision and bias of survival estimates from Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) and Barker models to known parameter values based on empirical data for steelhead/resident Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from the John Day River, Oregon. We simulated seasonal differences in recapture and survival rates, and we varied the number of fish tagged, recapture and resight rates, sample site size, and fish movement (migratory or resident). Survival estimates from the Barker model had higher precision and lower or equal bias in comparison with estimates from the CJS model under almost all simulation scenarios. The precision of Barker survival estimates increased the most as the number of tagged fish increased from 50 to 200 (CV = 0.4–0.09). The Barker model's superior performance was dependent on the availability of resight data; such data are becoming more readily available, especially in places where large numbers of individuals are PIT-tagged and where an interrogation infrastructure exists (e.g., Columbia River basin). Tagging of 75–100 fish/site during high-capture periods (e.g., summer and fall) and focusing on the resighting of fish with fixed or mobile interrogators during low-capture periods (i.e., winter and spring) may be the most cost-effective strategy for improving estimates of juvenile steelhead survival. Received April 18, 2014; accepted August 26, 2014</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00028487.2014.963254</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1548-8659
ispartof Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900), 2015-01, Vol.144 (1), p.34-47
issn 1548-8659
0002-8487
1548-8659
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660431112
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects autumn
cost effectiveness
fish
Freshwater
infrastructure
juveniles
migratory behavior
Oncorhynchus mykiss
rivers
seasonal variation
spring
summer
survival rate
watersheds
winter
title Comparison of Tributary Survival Estimates of Steelhead using Cormack–Jolly–Seber and Barker Models: Implications for Sampling Efforts and Designs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A39%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Tributary%20Survival%20Estimates%20of%20Steelhead%20using%20Cormack%E2%80%93Jolly%E2%80%93Seber%20and%20Barker%20Models:%20Implications%20for%20Sampling%20Efforts%20and%20Designs&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20American%20Fisheries%20Society%20(1900)&rft.au=Conner,%20Mary%20M&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=34-47&rft.issn=1548-8659&rft.eissn=1548-8659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00028487.2014.963254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660431112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-ec77b17856f18ef2eeab2e890c96016b3ec766ce705aeed5dcf46f45645fcd723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660431112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true