Loading…

Glucose–Fructose Enhances Performance versus Isocaloric, but Not Moderate, Glucose

PURPOSEThe effects of glucose-and-fructose (GF) coingestion on cycling time trial (TT) performance and physiological responses to exercise were examined under postprandial conditions. METHODSEight trained male cyclists (age, 25 ± 6 yr; height, 180 ± 4 cm; weight, 77 ± 9 kg; V˙O2max, 62 ± 6 mL·kg·min...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2014-09, Vol.46 (9), p.1778-1786
Main Authors: BAUR, DANIEL A, SCHROER, ADAM B, LUDEN, NICHOLAS D, WOMACK, CHRISTOPHER J, SMYTH, SARAH A, SAUNDERS, MICHAEL J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSEThe effects of glucose-and-fructose (GF) coingestion on cycling time trial (TT) performance and physiological responses to exercise were examined under postprandial conditions. METHODSEight trained male cyclists (age, 25 ± 6 yr; height, 180 ± 4 cm; weight, 77 ± 9 kg; V˙O2max, 62 ± 6 mL·kg·min) completed the study. Subjects ingested either an artificially sweetened placebo (PL), a moderate-glucose beverage (MG, 1.03 g·min), a high-glucose beverage (HG, 1.55 g·min), or a GF beverage (1.55 g·min, 2:1 ratio) during approximately 3 h of exercise, including 2 h of constant-load cycling (55% Wmax, 195 ± 17 W), immediately followed by a computer-simulated 30-km TT. Physiological responses (V˙E, V˙O2, RER, HR, blood glucose level, blood lactate level, and RPE) and incidences of gastrointestinal distress were assessed during early (15–20 min), middle (55–60 min), and late exercise (115–120 min) and during the TT. Magnitude-based qualitative inferences were used to evaluate differences between treatments. RESULTSIn comparison with that in PL (52.9 ± 3.7 min), TT performances were faster with GF (50.4 ± 2.2 min, “very likely” benefit), MG (51.1 ± 2.4 min, “likely” benefit), and HG (52.0 ± 3.7 min, “possible” benefit). GF resulted in a “likely” improvement versus HG (3.0%) and an “unclear” effect relative to MG (1.2%). MG was “possibly” beneficial versus HG (1.8%). Few incidences of GI distress were reported in any trials. CONCLUSIONSGF ingestion seems to enhance performance, relative to PL and HG. However, it is unclear whether GF improves performance versus moderate doses of glucose.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000284