Loading…
Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?
Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefi...
Saved in:
Published in: | The surgeon (Edinburgh) 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.52-58 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153 |
container_end_page | 58 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | The surgeon (Edinburgh) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | McHugh, S.M Hill, A.D.K Humphreys, H |
description | Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660927448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1479666X14001255</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660927448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq2Kii4tv6AS8pFLwvgryR4AoYovaSsOpRI3y2tPWi-JvdhJq_57HLZw6IXTSDPvO6_mGULOGdQMWPNmV-c53WDNgcnSqQHEEVlxCapSnYRnZMVku66apvlxQl7kvAPgSoB6Tk64kkrwlq_I1caMPphEjU_9EO-pCY5Ot0j3Ce8wTD4GGnu6JHlrBpr9hNSHHu0yqullTEhvTRqLyQR6E6N7f0aOezNkfPlYT8n1p4_fL75Um2-fv1582FRWKZgqh7gFBWhl0wBIo4wTXSetQcGcbNqO9Qq4WAvHHWdb3q0VWuxsy7tGcqbEKXl92LtP8deMedKjzxaHwQSMc9as7F3zVsquSMVBalPMOWGv98mPJj1oBnqhqXf6D0290FyahWZxvXoMmLcjun-ev_iK4O1BgOXMO49JZ-sxWHQ-FULaRf-fgHdP_HbwYQH9Ex8w7-KcQiGomc5cg75aHrr8k0kAxpUSvwFjI5sI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660927448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>McHugh, S.M ; Hill, A.D.K ; Humphreys, H</creator><creatorcontrib>McHugh, S.M ; Hill, A.D.K ; Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-666X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-5840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25453272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Laminar airflow ; Operating Rooms - standards ; Orthopedics ; SSI ; Surgery ; Surgical infection ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Theatre ventilation ; Ventilation - methods</subject><ispartof>The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.52-58</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><rights>2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McHugh, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, A.D.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><title>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</title><title>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Laminar airflow</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - standards</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>SSI</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical infection</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Theatre ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation - methods</subject><issn>1479-666X</issn><issn>2405-5840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq2Kii4tv6AS8pFLwvgryR4AoYovaSsOpRI3y2tPWi-JvdhJq_57HLZw6IXTSDPvO6_mGULOGdQMWPNmV-c53WDNgcnSqQHEEVlxCapSnYRnZMVku66apvlxQl7kvAPgSoB6Tk64kkrwlq_I1caMPphEjU_9EO-pCY5Ot0j3Ce8wTD4GGnu6JHlrBpr9hNSHHu0yqullTEhvTRqLyQR6E6N7f0aOezNkfPlYT8n1p4_fL75Um2-fv1582FRWKZgqh7gFBWhl0wBIo4wTXSetQcGcbNqO9Qq4WAvHHWdb3q0VWuxsy7tGcqbEKXl92LtP8deMedKjzxaHwQSMc9as7F3zVsquSMVBalPMOWGv98mPJj1oBnqhqXf6D0290FyahWZxvXoMmLcjun-ev_iK4O1BgOXMO49JZ-sxWHQ-FULaRf-fgHdP_HbwYQH9Ex8w7-KcQiGomc5cg75aHrr8k0kAxpUSvwFjI5sI</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>McHugh, S.M</creator><creator>Hill, A.D.K</creator><creator>Humphreys, H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</title><author>McHugh, S.M ; Hill, A.D.K ; Humphreys, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Laminar airflow</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - standards</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>SSI</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical infection</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Theatre ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McHugh, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, A.D.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McHugh, S.M</au><au>Hill, A.D.K</au><au>Humphreys, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</atitle><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>52-58</pages><issn>1479-666X</issn><eissn>2405-5840</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25453272</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1479-666X |
ispartof | The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.52-58 |
issn | 1479-666X 2405-5840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660927448 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Humans Infection Control - methods Laminar airflow Operating Rooms - standards Orthopedics SSI Surgery Surgical infection Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Theatre ventilation Ventilation - methods |
title | Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A32%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laminar%20airflow%20and%20the%20prevention%20of%20surgical%20site%20infection.%20More%20harm%20than%20good?&rft.jtitle=The%20surgeon%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=McHugh,%20S.M&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=52-58&rft.issn=1479-666X&rft.eissn=2405-5840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660927448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660927448&rft_id=info:pmid/25453272&rfr_iscdi=true |