Loading…

Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?

Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The surgeon (Edinburgh) 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.52-58
Main Authors: McHugh, S.M, Hill, A.D.K, Humphreys, H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 52
container_title The surgeon (Edinburgh)
container_volume 13
creator McHugh, S.M
Hill, A.D.K
Humphreys, H
description Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660927448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1479666X14001255</els_id><sourcerecordid>1660927448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq2Kii4tv6AS8pFLwvgryR4AoYovaSsOpRI3y2tPWi-JvdhJq_57HLZw6IXTSDPvO6_mGULOGdQMWPNmV-c53WDNgcnSqQHEEVlxCapSnYRnZMVku66apvlxQl7kvAPgSoB6Tk64kkrwlq_I1caMPphEjU_9EO-pCY5Ot0j3Ce8wTD4GGnu6JHlrBpr9hNSHHu0yqullTEhvTRqLyQR6E6N7f0aOezNkfPlYT8n1p4_fL75Um2-fv1582FRWKZgqh7gFBWhl0wBIo4wTXSetQcGcbNqO9Qq4WAvHHWdb3q0VWuxsy7tGcqbEKXl92LtP8deMedKjzxaHwQSMc9as7F3zVsquSMVBalPMOWGv98mPJj1oBnqhqXf6D0290FyahWZxvXoMmLcjun-ev_iK4O1BgOXMO49JZ-sxWHQ-FULaRf-fgHdP_HbwYQH9Ex8w7-KcQiGomc5cg75aHrr8k0kAxpUSvwFjI5sI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660927448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>McHugh, S.M ; Hill, A.D.K ; Humphreys, H</creator><creatorcontrib>McHugh, S.M ; Hill, A.D.K ; Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-666X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-5840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25453272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Laminar airflow ; Operating Rooms - standards ; Orthopedics ; SSI ; Surgery ; Surgical infection ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Theatre ventilation ; Ventilation - methods</subject><ispartof>The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.52-58</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><rights>2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McHugh, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, A.D.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><title>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</title><title>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Laminar airflow</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - standards</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>SSI</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical infection</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Theatre ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation - methods</subject><issn>1479-666X</issn><issn>2405-5840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq2Kii4tv6AS8pFLwvgryR4AoYovaSsOpRI3y2tPWi-JvdhJq_57HLZw6IXTSDPvO6_mGULOGdQMWPNmV-c53WDNgcnSqQHEEVlxCapSnYRnZMVku66apvlxQl7kvAPgSoB6Tk64kkrwlq_I1caMPphEjU_9EO-pCY5Ot0j3Ce8wTD4GGnu6JHlrBpr9hNSHHu0yqullTEhvTRqLyQR6E6N7f0aOezNkfPlYT8n1p4_fL75Um2-fv1582FRWKZgqh7gFBWhl0wBIo4wTXSetQcGcbNqO9Qq4WAvHHWdb3q0VWuxsy7tGcqbEKXl92LtP8deMedKjzxaHwQSMc9as7F3zVsquSMVBalPMOWGv98mPJj1oBnqhqXf6D0290FyahWZxvXoMmLcjun-ev_iK4O1BgOXMO49JZ-sxWHQ-FULaRf-fgHdP_HbwYQH9Ex8w7-KcQiGomc5cg75aHrr8k0kAxpUSvwFjI5sI</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>McHugh, S.M</creator><creator>Hill, A.D.K</creator><creator>Humphreys, H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</title><author>McHugh, S.M ; Hill, A.D.K ; Humphreys, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Laminar airflow</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - standards</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>SSI</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical infection</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Theatre ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McHugh, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, A.D.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McHugh, S.M</au><au>Hill, A.D.K</au><au>Humphreys, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?</atitle><jtitle>The surgeon (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Surgeon</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>52-58</pages><issn>1479-666X</issn><eissn>2405-5840</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Laminar airflow (LAF) systems are thought to minimise contamination of the surgical field with airborne microbes and thus to contribute to reducing surgical site infections (SSI). However recent publications have questioned whether LAF ventilation confers any significant benefit and may indeed be harmful. Methods A detailed literature review was undertaken through www.Pubmed.com and Google scholar ( http://scholar.google.com ). Search terms used included “laminar flow”. “laminar airflow”, “surgical site infection prevention”, “theatre ventilation” and “operating room ventilation”, “orthopaedic theatre” and “ultra-clean ventilation”. Peer-reviewed publications in the English language over the last 50 years were included, up to and including March 2014. Results Laminar airflow systems are predominantly used in clean prosthetic implant surgery. Several studies have demonstrated decreased air bacterial contamination with LAF using bacterial sedimentation plates placed in key areas of the operating room. However, apart from the initial Medical Research Council study, there are few clinical studies demonstrating a convincing correlation between decreased SSI rates and LAF. Moreover, recent analyses suggest increased post-operative SSI rates. Conclusion It is premature to dispense with LAF as a measure to improve air quality in operating rooms where prosthetic joint surgery is being carried out. However, new multi-centre trials to assess this or the use of national prospective surveillance systems to explore other variables that might explain these findings such as poor operating room discipline are needed, to resolve this important surgical issue.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>25453272</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-666X
ispartof The surgeon (Edinburgh), 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.52-58
issn 1479-666X
2405-5840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1660927448
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Humans
Infection Control - methods
Laminar airflow
Operating Rooms - standards
Orthopedics
SSI
Surgery
Surgical infection
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Theatre ventilation
Ventilation - methods
title Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A32%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laminar%20airflow%20and%20the%20prevention%20of%20surgical%20site%20infection.%20More%20harm%20than%20good?&rft.jtitle=The%20surgeon%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=McHugh,%20S.M&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=52-58&rft.issn=1479-666X&rft.eissn=2405-5840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surge.2014.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660927448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-deeb050ec466004a5ad3884cae31d46781f502393d2d21b2895ece8c728642153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660927448&rft_id=info:pmid/25453272&rfr_iscdi=true