Loading…

Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans

The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug and alcohol dependence 1993-02, Vol.31 (3), p.265-280
Main Authors: Dohrn, Cathleen S., Lichtor, J.Lance, Coalson, Dennis W., Uitvlugt, Anna, de Wit, Harriet, Zacny, James P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733
cites
container_end_page 280
container_issue 3
container_start_page 265
container_title Drug and alcohol dependence
container_volume 31
creator Dohrn, Cathleen S.
Lichtor, J.Lance
Coalson, Dennis W.
Uitvlugt, Anna
de Wit, Harriet
Zacny, James P.
description The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16623117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>037687169390009F</els_id><sourcerecordid>16623117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwmmzSfFwEKa0KBUH0HNLsxEa22Zpspf57U1t69DQw7zPDy4PQOcG3BBN-h6ngpRSEXyt6ozDGqpwcoD6RQpUYM36I-nvkGJ2k9JkZzBXuoZ5kvGJk2EfjV_DBtdH68FGAc2C7VLSugHUHoYa68GFuGtP5NmzWwXexXWVi7WvIWTFfLUxIp-jImSbB2W4O0Ptk_DZ6Kqcvj8-jh2lpGRFdaaCiQ-aAy5rIimKonHJYGCpAVKYWohKMKS6o4Uyq3FRyZR0FLGE2Y4LSAbra_l3G9msFqdMLnyw0jQmQa2nCeUUJERlkW9DGNqUITi-jX5j4ownWG3t6o0Zv1GhF9Z89PclnF7v_q9kC6v3RTlfOL3e5SdY0LppgfdpjjGM-rGTG7rcYZBffHqJO1kOwUPuYBeu69f_3-AW0rYo1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16623117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dohrn, Cathleen S. ; Lichtor, J.Lance ; Coalson, Dennis W. ; Uitvlugt, Anna ; de Wit, Harriet ; Zacny, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Cathleen S. ; Lichtor, J.Lance ; Coalson, Dennis W. ; Uitvlugt, Anna ; de Wit, Harriet ; Zacny, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8462415</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DADEDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Adult ; Affect - drug effects ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Arousal - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Euphoria - drug effects ; Female ; gender differences ; human ; Humans ; individual differences ; Individuality ; inhalants ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; nitrous oxide ; Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychomotor Performance - drug effects ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; reinforcing effects ; subjective effects ; Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol dependence, 1993-02, Vol.31 (3), p.265-280</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037687169390009F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4606528$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8462415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtor, J.Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coalson, Dennis W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitvlugt, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacny, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</title><title>Drug and alcohol dependence</title><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><description>The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect - drug effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Arousal - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Euphoria - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>individual differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>inhalants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>reinforcing effects</subject><subject>subjective effects</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><issn>0376-8716</issn><issn>1879-0046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwmmzSfFwEKa0KBUH0HNLsxEa22Zpspf57U1t69DQw7zPDy4PQOcG3BBN-h6ngpRSEXyt6ozDGqpwcoD6RQpUYM36I-nvkGJ2k9JkZzBXuoZ5kvGJk2EfjV_DBtdH68FGAc2C7VLSugHUHoYa68GFuGtP5NmzWwXexXWVi7WvIWTFfLUxIp-jImSbB2W4O0Ptk_DZ6Kqcvj8-jh2lpGRFdaaCiQ-aAy5rIimKonHJYGCpAVKYWohKMKS6o4Uyq3FRyZR0FLGE2Y4LSAbra_l3G9msFqdMLnyw0jQmQa2nCeUUJERlkW9DGNqUITi-jX5j4ownWG3t6o0Zv1GhF9Z89PclnF7v_q9kC6v3RTlfOL3e5SdY0LppgfdpjjGM-rGTG7rcYZBffHqJO1kOwUPuYBeu69f_3-AW0rYo1</recordid><startdate>19930201</startdate><enddate>19930201</enddate><creator>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</creator><creator>Lichtor, J.Lance</creator><creator>Coalson, Dennis W.</creator><creator>Uitvlugt, Anna</creator><creator>de Wit, Harriet</creator><creator>Zacny, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930201</creationdate><title>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</title><author>Dohrn, Cathleen S. ; Lichtor, J.Lance ; Coalson, Dennis W. ; Uitvlugt, Anna ; de Wit, Harriet ; Zacny, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect - drug effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Arousal - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Euphoria - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>individual differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>inhalants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>reinforcing effects</topic><topic>subjective effects</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtor, J.Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coalson, Dennis W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitvlugt, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacny, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</au><au>Lichtor, J.Lance</au><au>Coalson, Dennis W.</au><au>Uitvlugt, Anna</au><au>de Wit, Harriet</au><au>Zacny, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><date>1993-02-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>265-280</pages><issn>0376-8716</issn><eissn>1879-0046</eissn><coden>DADEDV</coden><abstract>The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8462415</pmid><doi>10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-8716
ispartof Drug and alcohol dependence, 1993-02, Vol.31 (3), p.265-280
issn 0376-8716
1879-0046
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16623117
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Adult
Affect - drug effects
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Arousal - drug effects
Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Euphoria - drug effects
Female
gender differences
human
Humans
individual differences
Individuality
inhalants
Male
Medical sciences
Neuropharmacology
nitrous oxide
Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Psychomotor Performance - drug effects
Reaction Time - drug effects
reinforcing effects
subjective effects
Substance-Related Disorders - psychology
title Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A55%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reinforcing%20effects%20of%20extended%20inhalation%20of%20nitrous%20oxide%20in%20humans&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20dependence&rft.au=Dohrn,%20Cathleen%20S.&rft.date=1993-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=265-280&rft.issn=0376-8716&rft.eissn=1879-0046&rft.coden=DADEDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16623117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16623117&rft_id=info:pmid/8462415&rfr_iscdi=true