Loading…
Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans
The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug and alcohol dependence 1993-02, Vol.31 (3), p.265-280 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 280 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Drug and alcohol dependence |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Dohrn, Cathleen S. Lichtor, J.Lance Coalson, Dennis W. Uitvlugt, Anna de Wit, Harriet Zacny, James P. |
description | The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16623117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>037687169390009F</els_id><sourcerecordid>16623117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwmmzSfFwEKa0KBUH0HNLsxEa22Zpspf57U1t69DQw7zPDy4PQOcG3BBN-h6ngpRSEXyt6ozDGqpwcoD6RQpUYM36I-nvkGJ2k9JkZzBXuoZ5kvGJk2EfjV_DBtdH68FGAc2C7VLSugHUHoYa68GFuGtP5NmzWwXexXWVi7WvIWTFfLUxIp-jImSbB2W4O0Ptk_DZ6Kqcvj8-jh2lpGRFdaaCiQ-aAy5rIimKonHJYGCpAVKYWohKMKS6o4Uyq3FRyZR0FLGE2Y4LSAbra_l3G9msFqdMLnyw0jQmQa2nCeUUJERlkW9DGNqUITi-jX5j4ownWG3t6o0Zv1GhF9Z89PclnF7v_q9kC6v3RTlfOL3e5SdY0LppgfdpjjGM-rGTG7rcYZBffHqJO1kOwUPuYBeu69f_3-AW0rYo1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16623117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dohrn, Cathleen S. ; Lichtor, J.Lance ; Coalson, Dennis W. ; Uitvlugt, Anna ; de Wit, Harriet ; Zacny, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Cathleen S. ; Lichtor, J.Lance ; Coalson, Dennis W. ; Uitvlugt, Anna ; de Wit, Harriet ; Zacny, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8462415</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DADEDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Adult ; Affect - drug effects ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Arousal - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Euphoria - drug effects ; Female ; gender differences ; human ; Humans ; individual differences ; Individuality ; inhalants ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; nitrous oxide ; Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychomotor Performance - drug effects ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; reinforcing effects ; subjective effects ; Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol dependence, 1993-02, Vol.31 (3), p.265-280</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037687169390009F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4606528$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8462415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtor, J.Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coalson, Dennis W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitvlugt, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacny, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</title><title>Drug and alcohol dependence</title><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><description>The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect - drug effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Arousal - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Euphoria - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>individual differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>inhalants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>reinforcing effects</subject><subject>subjective effects</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><issn>0376-8716</issn><issn>1879-0046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwmmzSfFwEKa0KBUH0HNLsxEa22Zpspf57U1t69DQw7zPDy4PQOcG3BBN-h6ngpRSEXyt6ozDGqpwcoD6RQpUYM36I-nvkGJ2k9JkZzBXuoZ5kvGJk2EfjV_DBtdH68FGAc2C7VLSugHUHoYa68GFuGtP5NmzWwXexXWVi7WvIWTFfLUxIp-jImSbB2W4O0Ptk_DZ6Kqcvj8-jh2lpGRFdaaCiQ-aAy5rIimKonHJYGCpAVKYWohKMKS6o4Uyq3FRyZR0FLGE2Y4LSAbra_l3G9msFqdMLnyw0jQmQa2nCeUUJERlkW9DGNqUITi-jX5j4ownWG3t6o0Zv1GhF9Z89PclnF7v_q9kC6v3RTlfOL3e5SdY0LppgfdpjjGM-rGTG7rcYZBffHqJO1kOwUPuYBeu69f_3-AW0rYo1</recordid><startdate>19930201</startdate><enddate>19930201</enddate><creator>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</creator><creator>Lichtor, J.Lance</creator><creator>Coalson, Dennis W.</creator><creator>Uitvlugt, Anna</creator><creator>de Wit, Harriet</creator><creator>Zacny, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930201</creationdate><title>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</title><author>Dohrn, Cathleen S. ; Lichtor, J.Lance ; Coalson, Dennis W. ; Uitvlugt, Anna ; de Wit, Harriet ; Zacny, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect - drug effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Arousal - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Euphoria - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>individual differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>inhalants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - drug effects</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>reinforcing effects</topic><topic>subjective effects</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtor, J.Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coalson, Dennis W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uitvlugt, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Harriet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacny, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dohrn, Cathleen S.</au><au>Lichtor, J.Lance</au><au>Coalson, Dennis W.</au><au>Uitvlugt, Anna</au><au>de Wit, Harriet</au><au>Zacny, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><date>1993-02-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>265-280</pages><issn>0376-8716</issn><eissn>1879-0046</eissn><coden>DADEDV</coden><abstract>The subjective, psychomotor and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide at subanesthetic doses (30% and 40% in oxygen) were determined in normal healthy volunteers using a choice paradigm. Thirty percent nitrous oxide was chosen no more often than oxygen (41.6% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was no more reinforcing than oxygen inhalation. Forty percent nitrous oxide was chosen significantly less often than oxygen (22% choice rate), indicating that, for most of the subjects tested, extended inhalation of this nitrous oxide concentration was less reinforcing than oxygen. Nitrous oxide produced robust subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of ‘high,’ ‘tingling,’ and ‘dizzy’). Subjects who chose nitrous oxide reported pleasant subjective effects and liked it, while those who chose placebo reported unpleasant subjective effects and disliked it. Both concentrations of nitrous oxide impaired psychomotor performance in all subjects. The lack of reinforcing effects noted in the present study, given nitrous oxide's known abuse potential, is discussed.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8462415</pmid><doi>10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8716 |
ispartof | Drug and alcohol dependence, 1993-02, Vol.31 (3), p.265-280 |
issn | 0376-8716 1879-0046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16623117 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Administration, Inhalation Adult Affect - drug effects Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents Arousal - drug effects Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Euphoria - drug effects Female gender differences human Humans individual differences Individuality inhalants Male Medical sciences Neuropharmacology nitrous oxide Nitrous Oxide - pharmacology Pharmacology. Drug treatments Psychomotor Performance - drug effects Reaction Time - drug effects reinforcing effects subjective effects Substance-Related Disorders - psychology |
title | Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A55%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reinforcing%20effects%20of%20extended%20inhalation%20of%20nitrous%20oxide%20in%20humans&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20dependence&rft.au=Dohrn,%20Cathleen%20S.&rft.date=1993-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=265-280&rft.issn=0376-8716&rft.eissn=1879-0046&rft.coden=DADEDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0376-8716(93)90009-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16623117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ae2354fe68d18230e2f9f07a37e72ad7727449673a6489690869cf3e08ebb4733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16623117&rft_id=info:pmid/8462415&rfr_iscdi=true |