Loading…

Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging

Summary Introduction Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric anesthesia 2015-04, Vol.25 (4), p.421-427
Main Authors: Moustafa, Moustafa A., Emara, Doaa M., Nouh, Mohamed R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403
container_end_page 427
container_issue 4
container_start_page 421
container_title Pediatric anesthesia
container_volume 25
creator Moustafa, Moustafa A.
Emara, Doaa M.
Nouh, Mohamed R.
description Summary Introduction Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency. Aim of the study Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure. Materials and Methods Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis. Results At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences. Conclusion Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pan.12593
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1662431116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3614477781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiNERS-w4AWQJTZ0kdb3NMtqaIdKowEhEEvLYx-3bhM7tRNNpw_Ac-Nh2i6Q8MaW_Z1P5_ivqvcEn5CyTgcdTggVLXtVHRAucd2Klr4uZyJELSQX-9VhzrcYE0YlfVPtUyHOCG75QfX7wjkwI4oOaRTA3CETu04nFAOahgES0j6t9QZl_wjIB2RufGcTBJTB6hEsWvvxBg0pDtHFru691Y-x033x9Csf9OiLyU7Jh2vU6-sAozcoQY5BB1OM5a48va32nO4yvHvaj6qflxc_Zl_qxdf51ex8URsuCasZEa1dUWolPWtcOTSNcZhT24CxRlpmGk6kpJbZFrAAi-2Kg5NOAAPNMTuqPu28peH7CfKoep8NlIkDxCmrbTFn5U9lQT_-g97GKYXS3ZbCkoiGboXHO8qkmHMCp4ZUZkobRbDahqNKOOpvOIX98GScVj3YF_I5jQKc7oC172Dzf5P6dr58Vta7Cp9HeHip0OlOyYY1Qv1azhVefl_w-eyzwuwPUCipew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660615720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Moustafa, Moustafa A. ; Emara, Doaa M. ; Nouh, Mohamed R.</creator><contributor>Cote, Charles ; Cote, Charles</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Moustafa A. ; Emara, Doaa M. ; Nouh, Mohamed R. ; Cote, Charles ; Cote, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Introduction Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency. Aim of the study Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure. Materials and Methods Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis. Results At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences. Conclusion Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1155-5645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pan.12593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25581094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>airway ; Airway Management - adverse effects ; Airway Management - methods ; Airway Obstruction - chemically induced ; Airway Obstruction - prevention &amp; control ; Anatomy, Cross-Sectional ; Body Weight ; Child, Preschool ; children ; Conscious Sedation - adverse effects ; Conscious Sedation - methods ; Epiglottis - anatomy &amp; histology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects ; magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Midazolam - adverse effects ; Neck ; neck collar ; Palate, Soft - anatomy &amp; histology ; Propofol - adverse effects ; sedation ; Tongue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><ispartof>Pediatric anesthesia, 2015-04, Vol.25 (4), p.421-427</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cote, Charles</contributor><contributor>Cote, Charles</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emara, Doaa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nouh, Mohamed R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Pediatric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><description>Summary Introduction Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency. Aim of the study Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure. Materials and Methods Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis. Results At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences. Conclusion Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.</description><subject>airway</subject><subject>Airway Management - adverse effects</subject><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - chemically induced</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - methods</subject><subject>Epiglottis - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Midazolam - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>neck collar</subject><subject>Palate, Soft - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Propofol - adverse effects</subject><subject>sedation</subject><subject>Tongue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><issn>1155-5645</issn><issn>1460-9592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiNERS-w4AWQJTZ0kdb3NMtqaIdKowEhEEvLYx-3bhM7tRNNpw_Ac-Nh2i6Q8MaW_Z1P5_ivqvcEn5CyTgcdTggVLXtVHRAucd2Klr4uZyJELSQX-9VhzrcYE0YlfVPtUyHOCG75QfX7wjkwI4oOaRTA3CETu04nFAOahgES0j6t9QZl_wjIB2RufGcTBJTB6hEsWvvxBg0pDtHFru691Y-x033x9Csf9OiLyU7Jh2vU6-sAozcoQY5BB1OM5a48va32nO4yvHvaj6qflxc_Zl_qxdf51ex8URsuCasZEa1dUWolPWtcOTSNcZhT24CxRlpmGk6kpJbZFrAAi-2Kg5NOAAPNMTuqPu28peH7CfKoep8NlIkDxCmrbTFn5U9lQT_-g97GKYXS3ZbCkoiGboXHO8qkmHMCp4ZUZkobRbDahqNKOOpvOIX98GScVj3YF_I5jQKc7oC172Dzf5P6dr58Vta7Cp9HeHip0OlOyYY1Qv1azhVefl_w-eyzwuwPUCipew</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</creator><creator>Emara, Doaa M.</creator><creator>Nouh, Mohamed R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Moustafa, Moustafa A. ; Emara, Doaa M. ; Nouh, Mohamed R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>airway</topic><topic>Airway Management - adverse effects</topic><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - chemically induced</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - methods</topic><topic>Epiglottis - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Midazolam - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>neck collar</topic><topic>Palate, Soft - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Propofol - adverse effects</topic><topic>sedation</topic><topic>Tongue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emara, Doaa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nouh, Mohamed R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</au><au>Emara, Doaa M.</au><au>Nouh, Mohamed R.</au><au>Cote, Charles</au><au>Cote, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>421-427</pages><issn>1155-5645</issn><eissn>1460-9592</eissn><abstract>Summary Introduction Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency. Aim of the study Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure. Materials and Methods Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis. Results At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences. Conclusion Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25581094</pmid><doi>10.1111/pan.12593</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1155-5645
ispartof Pediatric anesthesia, 2015-04, Vol.25 (4), p.421-427
issn 1155-5645
1460-9592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1662431116
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects airway
Airway Management - adverse effects
Airway Management - methods
Airway Obstruction - chemically induced
Airway Obstruction - prevention & control
Anatomy, Cross-Sectional
Body Weight
Child, Preschool
children
Conscious Sedation - adverse effects
Conscious Sedation - methods
Epiglottis - anatomy & histology
Female
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects
magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Midazolam - adverse effects
Neck
neck collar
Palate, Soft - anatomy & histology
Propofol - adverse effects
sedation
Tongue - anatomy & histology
title Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20neck%20collar%20on%20upper%20airway%20size%20in%20children%20sedated%20with%20propofol-midazolam%20combination%20during%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Moustafa,%20Moustafa%20A.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=421-427&rft.issn=1155-5645&rft.eissn=1460-9592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pan.12593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3614477781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660615720&rft_id=info:pmid/25581094&rfr_iscdi=true