Loading…
Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging
Summary Introduction Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric anesthesia 2015-04, Vol.25 (4), p.421-427 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403 |
container_end_page | 427 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 421 |
container_title | Pediatric anesthesia |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Moustafa, Moustafa A. Emara, Doaa M. Nouh, Mohamed R. |
description | Summary
Introduction
Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency.
Aim of the study
Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure.
Materials and Methods
Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis.
Results
At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences.
Conclusion
Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pan.12593 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1662431116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3614477781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiNERS-w4AWQJTZ0kdb3NMtqaIdKowEhEEvLYx-3bhM7tRNNpw_Ac-Nh2i6Q8MaW_Z1P5_ivqvcEn5CyTgcdTggVLXtVHRAucd2Klr4uZyJELSQX-9VhzrcYE0YlfVPtUyHOCG75QfX7wjkwI4oOaRTA3CETu04nFAOahgES0j6t9QZl_wjIB2RufGcTBJTB6hEsWvvxBg0pDtHFru691Y-x033x9Csf9OiLyU7Jh2vU6-sAozcoQY5BB1OM5a48va32nO4yvHvaj6qflxc_Zl_qxdf51ex8URsuCasZEa1dUWolPWtcOTSNcZhT24CxRlpmGk6kpJbZFrAAi-2Kg5NOAAPNMTuqPu28peH7CfKoep8NlIkDxCmrbTFn5U9lQT_-g97GKYXS3ZbCkoiGboXHO8qkmHMCp4ZUZkobRbDahqNKOOpvOIX98GScVj3YF_I5jQKc7oC172Dzf5P6dr58Vta7Cp9HeHip0OlOyYY1Qv1azhVefl_w-eyzwuwPUCipew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660615720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Moustafa, Moustafa A. ; Emara, Doaa M. ; Nouh, Mohamed R.</creator><contributor>Cote, Charles ; Cote, Charles</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Moustafa A. ; Emara, Doaa M. ; Nouh, Mohamed R. ; Cote, Charles ; Cote, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Introduction
Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency.
Aim of the study
Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure.
Materials and Methods
Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis.
Results
At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences.
Conclusion
Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1155-5645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pan.12593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25581094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>airway ; Airway Management - adverse effects ; Airway Management - methods ; Airway Obstruction - chemically induced ; Airway Obstruction - prevention & control ; Anatomy, Cross-Sectional ; Body Weight ; Child, Preschool ; children ; Conscious Sedation - adverse effects ; Conscious Sedation - methods ; Epiglottis - anatomy & histology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects ; magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Midazolam - adverse effects ; Neck ; neck collar ; Palate, Soft - anatomy & histology ; Propofol - adverse effects ; sedation ; Tongue - anatomy & histology</subject><ispartof>Pediatric anesthesia, 2015-04, Vol.25 (4), p.421-427</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cote, Charles</contributor><contributor>Cote, Charles</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emara, Doaa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nouh, Mohamed R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Pediatric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><description>Summary
Introduction
Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency.
Aim of the study
Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure.
Materials and Methods
Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis.
Results
At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences.
Conclusion
Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.</description><subject>airway</subject><subject>Airway Management - adverse effects</subject><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - chemically induced</subject><subject>Airway Obstruction - prevention & control</subject><subject>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - methods</subject><subject>Epiglottis - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Midazolam - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>neck collar</subject><subject>Palate, Soft - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Propofol - adverse effects</subject><subject>sedation</subject><subject>Tongue - anatomy & histology</subject><issn>1155-5645</issn><issn>1460-9592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiNERS-w4AWQJTZ0kdb3NMtqaIdKowEhEEvLYx-3bhM7tRNNpw_Ac-Nh2i6Q8MaW_Z1P5_ivqvcEn5CyTgcdTggVLXtVHRAucd2Klr4uZyJELSQX-9VhzrcYE0YlfVPtUyHOCG75QfX7wjkwI4oOaRTA3CETu04nFAOahgES0j6t9QZl_wjIB2RufGcTBJTB6hEsWvvxBg0pDtHFru691Y-x033x9Csf9OiLyU7Jh2vU6-sAozcoQY5BB1OM5a48va32nO4yvHvaj6qflxc_Zl_qxdf51ex8URsuCasZEa1dUWolPWtcOTSNcZhT24CxRlpmGk6kpJbZFrAAi-2Kg5NOAAPNMTuqPu28peH7CfKoep8NlIkDxCmrbTFn5U9lQT_-g97GKYXS3ZbCkoiGboXHO8qkmHMCp4ZUZkobRbDahqNKOOpvOIX98GScVj3YF_I5jQKc7oC172Dzf5P6dr58Vta7Cp9HeHip0OlOyYY1Qv1azhVefl_w-eyzwuwPUCipew</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</creator><creator>Emara, Doaa M.</creator><creator>Nouh, Mohamed R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Moustafa, Moustafa A. ; Emara, Doaa M. ; Nouh, Mohamed R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>airway</topic><topic>Airway Management - adverse effects</topic><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - chemically induced</topic><topic>Airway Obstruction - prevention & control</topic><topic>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - methods</topic><topic>Epiglottis - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Midazolam - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>neck collar</topic><topic>Palate, Soft - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Propofol - adverse effects</topic><topic>sedation</topic><topic>Tongue - anatomy & histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emara, Doaa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nouh, Mohamed R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moustafa, Moustafa A.</au><au>Emara, Doaa M.</au><au>Nouh, Mohamed R.</au><au>Cote, Charles</au><au>Cote, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Anaesth</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>421-427</pages><issn>1155-5645</issn><eissn>1460-9592</eissn><abstract>Summary
Introduction
Propofol and midazolam are widely used for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation. Increasing depth of sedation may be associated with airway obstruction. A neck collar supporting the mandible and maintaining the head in slight extension may be beneficial in maintaining airway patency.
Aim of the study
Primary aim: To assess upper airway size with and without a neck collar during pediatric MRI sedation with propofol–midazolam. Secondary aim: To evaluate complications encountered during the procedure.
Materials and Methods
Sixty patients aged 2–4 years scheduled for MRI of the brain were selected. They were sedated with intramuscular midazolam 0.1 mg·kg−1 30 min before the procedure. Patients were sedated with i.v. propofol 1 mg·kg−1 and continued with 50–100 μg·kg−1·min−1. T1 3D fast‐field echo axial sequence from the nasopharyngeal roof to subglottic region was taken with and without application of a neck collar. Airway dimensions were measured and analyzed at the base of the tongue, soft palate, and at the epiglottis.
Results
At the base of the tongue and soft palate, the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and the anteroposterior diameter of the airway were respectively statistically significantly higher when the neck collar was applied. The CSA at the epiglottis was significantly less with application of the neck collar. Complications were not significantly different between the two sequences.
Conclusion
Application of a soft neck collar in children aged 2–4 years may enhance the retropalatal and retroglossal airway dimensions during pediatric sedation in the supine position.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25581094</pmid><doi>10.1111/pan.12593</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1155-5645 |
ispartof | Pediatric anesthesia, 2015-04, Vol.25 (4), p.421-427 |
issn | 1155-5645 1460-9592 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1662431116 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | airway Airway Management - adverse effects Airway Management - methods Airway Obstruction - chemically induced Airway Obstruction - prevention & control Anatomy, Cross-Sectional Body Weight Child, Preschool children Conscious Sedation - adverse effects Conscious Sedation - methods Epiglottis - anatomy & histology Female Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects magnetic resonance Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Midazolam - adverse effects Neck neck collar Palate, Soft - anatomy & histology Propofol - adverse effects sedation Tongue - anatomy & histology |
title | Effect of a neck collar on upper airway size in children sedated with propofol-midazolam combination during magnetic resonance imaging |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20neck%20collar%20on%20upper%20airway%20size%20in%20children%20sedated%20with%20propofol-midazolam%20combination%20during%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Moustafa,%20Moustafa%20A.&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=421-427&rft.issn=1155-5645&rft.eissn=1460-9592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pan.12593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3614477781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4613-3159db22d6287fb2277cf042d7ecdc6d3c741662d3d9e05ed0db4ef6f5e3ea403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660615720&rft_id=info:pmid/25581094&rfr_iscdi=true |