The unique contribution of elements of smile aesthetics to psychosocial well-being

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation 2015-04, Vol.42 (4), p.275-281
• Main Authors: Lukez, A., Pavlic, A., Trinajstic Zrinski, M., Spalj, S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dentistry; Esthetics, Dental - psychology; Female; golden proportion; Humans; Male; malocclusion; Malocclusion - psychology; psychosocial influence; Risk Factors; Self Concept; smile aesthetics; Smiling - psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/joor.12250

Summary Pleasant smile aesthetics is an important contributory factor to psychosocial well‐being. The aim of this study was to determine the psychosocial influence of smile aesthetics. The study was cross‐sectional on a convenient sample that included patients, pupils, students and faculty staff. A total of 155 subjects (36% male) aged 12–39 (mean age 21, interquartile range 19–23) were included. Occlusal characteristics were recorded by the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need, and smiling frontal view photographs were obtained. Fourteen variables were measured using photogrammetric analysis: smile width, visibility of buccal corridors, maximum teeth exposure, total gingival display, lip thickness, degree of occlusal cant and deviation from golden proportion of the teeth in maxillary intercanine sector. Psychometric instruments included the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire and the Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale. Statistical analysis comprised multiple linear regressions. Malocclusion severity is the most important predictor of psychosocial influence of smile aesthetics and self‐esteem, the unique contribution of which accounts for a total of 4–27% of variability. Female gender is associated with higher psychological influence of dental aesthetics while male gender and older age with self‐esteem. Malocclusions have higher psychosocial impact than parameters of mini‐ and micro‐aesthetics of smile related to visibility of buccal corridors, amount of teeth exposure, gingival display, lip thickness, presence of occlusal cant and deviation from golden proportion of the teeth. It appears that people are not as focused on details of their smile as they are on distinctive malposition of teeth.