The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates

Largely overlooked by researchers studying the science of science communication are the specific journalistic practices and media structures that might enable more constructive public debate in politicized science controversies. In this commentary, we discuss the role that journalists can play as in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2015-03, Vol.658 (1), p.223-234
Main Authors: NISBET, MATTHEW C., FAHY, DECLAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biotechnology
Climate change
Commentary
Discourse analysis
Journalism
Knowledge
Politicization
Politics
Science
Scientific communication
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Largely overlooked by researchers studying the science of science communication are the specific journalistic practices and media structures that might enable more constructive public debate in politicized science controversies. In this commentary, we discuss the role that journalists can play as influential knowledge professionals, drawing on insights from the studies in this section of the special issue. In doing so, we outline three complementary approaches to what Thomas Patterson calls "knowledge-based journalism." By way of these approaches, journalists and their news organizations can contextualize and critically evaluate expert knowledge; facilitate discussion that bridges entrenched ideological divisions; and promote consideration of a broader menu of policy options and technologies. We conclude by discussing the implications for journalism education.
ISSN:0002-7162
1552-3349
DOI:10.1177/0002716214559887