Disparate Connectivity for Structural and Functional Networks is Revealed When Physical Location of the Connected Nodes is Considered

• Published in: Brain topography 2015-03, Vol.28 (2), p.187-196
• Main Authors: Pineda-Pardo, José Ángel, Martínez, Kenia, Solana, Ana Beatriz, Hernández-Tamames, Juan Antonio, Colom, Roberto, Pozo, Francisco del
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Brain - anatomy & histology; Brain - physiology; Brain Mapping; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Female; Humans; Neural Pathways - anatomy & histology; Neural Pathways - physiology; Neurology; Neurosciences; Original Paper; Psychiatry; Rest; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0896-0267; 1573-6792
• DOI: 10.1007/s10548-014-0393-3

Macroscopic brain networks have been widely described with the manifold of metrics available using graph theory. However, most analyses do not incorporate information about the physical position of network nodes. Here, we provide a multimodal macroscopic network characterization while considering the physical positions of nodes. To do so, we examined anatomical and functional macroscopic brain networks in a sample of twenty healthy subjects. Anatomical networks are obtained with a graph based tractography algorithm from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images (DW-MRI). Anatomical connections identified via DW-MRI provided probabilistic constraints for determining the connectedness of 90 different brain areas. Functional networks are derived from temporal linear correlations between blood-oxygenation level-dependent signals derived from the same brain areas. Rentian Scaling analysis, a technique adapted from very-large-scale integration circuits analyses, shows that functional networks are more random and less optimized than the anatomical networks. We also provide a new metric that allows quantifying the global connectivity arrangements for both structural and functional networks. While the functional networks show a higher contribution of inter-hemispheric connections, the anatomical networks highest connections are identified in a dorsal–ventral arrangement. These results indicate that anatomical and functional networks present different connectivity organizations that can only be identified when the physical locations of the nodes are included in the analysis.