Loading…
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was proposed as an oncologically safe approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods A systematic review of the studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy was conducted. The primary endpoint was an R0 resection rate. The second...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2015-04, Vol.19 (4), p.770-781 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was proposed as an oncologically safe approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Methods
A systematic review of the studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy was conducted. The primary endpoint was an R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoints were intra- and postoperative results, tumour size, mean harvested lymph node, number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy and overall survival.
Results
Five comparative case control studies involving 261 patients (30.7 % laparoscopic and 69.3 % open) who underwent a distal pancreatectomy were included. The R0 resection rate was similar between the two groups (
P
= 0.53). The laparoscopic group had longer operative times (
P
= 0.04), lesser blood loss (
P
= 0.01), a shorter hospital stay (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11605-014-2721-z |