Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: A critical review

Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short‐ and long‐term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of pain 2015-03, Vol.19 (3), p.377-391
Main Authors: Chen, C.X., Kwekkeboom, K.L., Ward, S.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dysmenorrhea - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Pain Measurement - standards
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Self Report - standards
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short‐ and long‐term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to test symptom interventions. The objective of this paper was to critically review the content and psychometric properties of self‐report tools to measure symptoms of PD. Databases including PubMed, PsychoINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched for self‐report symptom measures that had been used among women with either PD or perimenstrual symptoms. A total of 15 measures met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The measures were categorized into generic pain measures, dysmenorrhoea‐specific measures, and tools designed to measure perimenstrual symptoms. These measures had varying degrees of comprehensiveness of symptoms being measured, relevance to PD, multidimensionality and psychometric soundness. No single measure was found to be optimal for use, but some dysmenorrhoea‐specific measures could be recommended if revised and further tested. Key issues in symptom measurement for PD are discussed. Future research needs to strengthen dysmenorrhoea‐specific symptom measures by including a comprehensive list of symptoms based on the pathogenesis of PD, exploring relevant symptom dimensions beyond symptom severity (e.g., frequency, duration, symptom distress), and testing psychometric properties of the adapted tools using sound methodology and diverse samples.
ISSN:1090-3801
1532-2149
DOI:10.1002/ejp.556