The relationship between the fistula tract and the facial nerve in type II first branchial cleft anomalies

• Published in: Auris, nasus, larynx nasus, larynx, 2015-04, Vol.42 (2), p.119-122
• Main Authors: Ertas, Burak, Gunaydin, Rıza Onder, Unal, Omer Faruk
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Branchial anomaly; Branchial Region - abnormalities; Branchial Region - pathology; Branchial Region - surgery; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Craniofacial Abnormalities - pathology; Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery; Cutaneous Fistula - pathology; Cutaneous Fistula - surgery; Ear Canal - surgery; Facial nerve; Facial Nerve - anatomy & histology; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Otolaryngology; Pharyngeal Diseases - pathology; Pharyngeal Diseases - surgery; Retrospective Studies; Tract of branchial fistula
• ISSN: 0385-8146; 1879-1476
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2014.08.017

Abstract Objective To share our experience involving seven patients with type II first branchial cleft anomalies (hereafter, type II anomalies), to determine whether the location of the external fistula openings of the anomalies are associated with the location of the facial nerve tract, and elucidate the relationship between the location of the fistula opening and the facial nerve. Methods The medical records of seven patients who underwent surgery from 2005 to 2013 for type II anomalies were retrospectively examined. The relationship between the fistula opening and the facial nerve was evaluated in each patient with respect to whether the fistula opening was superior or inferior to the mandibular angle. All patients underwent partial parotidectomy, facial nerve exposure, and total excision of the mass together with connection of a small cuff of the external auditory canal skin to the fistula tract. Results The fistula tracts were located medially to the facial nerve in two patients, and both fistulae had openings inferior to the mandibular angle. The fistula tracts were located laterally to the facial nerve in the remaining five patients: one patient had no external opening, one had an opening inferior to the mandibular angle, and the remaining three had openings superior to the mandibular angle. Conclusion Because type II anomalies are rare, their diagnosis is difficult. Surgery of such lesions is challenging and associated with a high risk due to their proximity to the facial nerve. We believe that the location of the fistula opening may help to identify the relationship between the anomalous lesion and facial nerve. Studies involving larger series of cases are needed to confirm our hypothesis; however, because of the rarity of this specific anomaly, it will not be easy to compile a large number of cases. We believe that our study will encourage further investigation on this subject.