Loading…
Inspection, testing errors and trade in tainted products
•We study a trade game between a foreign firm and a home government.•We derive conditions under which a foreign firm chooses to export tainted products.•Conditions are obtained under which goods are imported though harmful to health.•We identify self-correcting mechanisms and aggravating activities....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Japanese and international economies 2015-03, Vol.35, p.99-116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •We study a trade game between a foreign firm and a home government.•We derive conditions under which a foreign firm chooses to export tainted products.•Conditions are obtained under which goods are imported though harmful to health.•We identify self-correcting mechanisms and aggravating activities.•Parameter regions of each Nash equilibrium are numerically simulated.
This paper examines international trade and inspection involving tainted products in a model of quality choice, facing fears that globalization is the cause of numerous food incidents. Particularly, we ask the following questions: (i) What are the conditions under which foreign firms choose to produce tainted goods? (ii) Does globalization via freer trade lower product safety? (iii) Why are goods imported even though they are known to be harmful? We show the existence of a free trade Nash equilibrium characterized by production and trade of high-quality non-tainted products. However, free trade cannot prevent the export of tainted goods, because the foreign firm may deviate under different combinations of parameters. We identify self-correcting mechanisms such as nationalism and a political-economy re-allocation of public resources in favor of customs authorities. Nevertheless, we also uncover activities that exacerbate tainted production like errors of testing and sabotage by rival firms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0889-1583 1095-8681 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jjie.2014.11.001 |