Police Detection of Deception: Beliefs About Behavioral Cues to Deception Are Strong Even Though Contextual Evidence Is More Useful

Research questions the validity of behavioral deception cues; however, people believe behavioral cues are reliable deception indicators. Police officers and community members indicated both how lies can be detected (beliefs), and how they discovered a lie in the past (revealing information). Officer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of communication 2015-02, Vol.65 (1), p.125-145
Main Authors: Masip, Jaume, Herrero, Carmen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavioral psychology
Beliefs
Communication
Community membership
Context
Contextual analysis
Deception
Deception Cues
Lying
Police
Social behaviour
TDT
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research questions the validity of behavioral deception cues; however, people believe behavioral cues are reliable deception indicators. Police officers and community members indicated both how lies can be detected (beliefs), and how they discovered a lie in the past (revealing information). Officers did the latter twice, prompted with a professional versus a personal context. For both groups, beliefs were primarily behavioral (e.g., demeanor) and revealing information contextual (evidence, third‐party information, etc.). Officers responded similarly regardless of context. Relative to community members, officers provided more cues and referred more often to verbal contradictions and active detection strategies when asked about beliefs. Practitioners should be made aware of the discrepancies between their beliefs about deception cues and useful information to detect lies.
ISSN:0021-9916
1460-2466
DOI:10.1111/jcom.12135