Loading…
Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy
Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reading & writing 2014-10, Vol.27 (9), p.1567-1583 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13 |
container_end_page | 1583 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1567 |
container_title | Reading & writing |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Bulger, Monica E. Mayer, Richard E. Metzger, Miriam J. |
description | Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11145-014-9507-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667937367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1040997</ericid><sourcerecordid>3421341861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7-AR6Eghcv1Zk2aTZH8fsDvOg5pMl0zdJt16SL7H9vloqI4OkxzG_eGx5jxwjnCCAvIiJykQPyXAmQebHDJihkmYMCscsmoIoi51LKfXYQ4wIAihkvJ-z6qes_W3JzykznslXoLcVIMRvezZBGct5utW-89dTZTea7zPm5H0ybtX6gYOzmkO01po109K1T9nZ783p1nz-_3D1cXT7ntpQ45E1RC4kSZw6rijhJW0PFLTRloQwmxllb26p2spqhE1SbsiacKS6VVdJhOWVno2_652NNcdBLHy21remoX0edbKUqZVnJhJ7-QRf9OnTpO41CKIEcOSQKR8qGPsZAjV4FvzRhoxH0tlc99qpTr3rbqy7Szcl4Q8HbH_7mEYGDUtvkYtzHtOvmFH4l_2v6BTMqg7I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559514140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Bulger, Monica E. ; Mayer, Richard E. ; Metzger, Miriam J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bulger, Monica E. ; Mayer, Richard E. ; Metzger, Miriam J.</creatorcontrib><description>Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11145-014-9507-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REWRE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Access to Computers ; Audiences ; Classrooms ; College Students ; Computers ; Digital imaging ; Digital literacy ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational Attainment ; Educational Experience ; Educational Technology ; Essays ; Internet ; Knowledge Level ; Language and Literature ; Laptop Computers ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Media Literacy ; Neurology ; Observation ; Prediction ; Prior Learning ; Psycholinguistics ; Questionnaires ; Reading Ability ; Social Sciences ; Websites ; Word Processing ; Writing Processes</subject><ispartof>Reading & writing, 2014-10, Vol.27 (9), p.1567-1583</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1559514140/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1559514140?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12849,21376,21380,21392,27922,27923,31267,31268,33609,33610,33875,33876,33909,33910,43731,43878,43894,62659,62660,62662,62675,73966,73991,74167,74183</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1040997$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bulger, Monica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzger, Miriam J.</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy</title><title>Reading & writing</title><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><description>Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media.</description><subject>Access to Computers</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Digital literacy</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Language and Literature</subject><subject>Laptop Computers</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Media Literacy</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reading Ability</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><subject>Writing Processes</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7-AR6Eghcv1Zk2aTZH8fsDvOg5pMl0zdJt16SL7H9vloqI4OkxzG_eGx5jxwjnCCAvIiJykQPyXAmQebHDJihkmYMCscsmoIoi51LKfXYQ4wIAihkvJ-z6qes_W3JzykznslXoLcVIMRvezZBGct5utW-89dTZTea7zPm5H0ybtX6gYOzmkO01po109K1T9nZ783p1nz-_3D1cXT7ntpQ45E1RC4kSZw6rijhJW0PFLTRloQwmxllb26p2spqhE1SbsiacKS6VVdJhOWVno2_652NNcdBLHy21remoX0edbKUqZVnJhJ7-QRf9OnTpO41CKIEcOSQKR8qGPsZAjV4FvzRhoxH0tlc99qpTr3rbqy7Szcl4Q8HbH_7mEYGDUtvkYtzHtOvmFH4l_2v6BTMqg7I</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Bulger, Monica E.</creator><creator>Mayer, Richard E.</creator><creator>Metzger, Miriam J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy</title><author>Bulger, Monica E. ; Mayer, Richard E. ; Metzger, Miriam J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Access to Computers</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Digital literacy</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Language and Literature</topic><topic>Laptop Computers</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Media Literacy</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reading Ability</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><topic>Writing Processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bulger, Monica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzger, Miriam J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bulger, Monica E.</au><au>Mayer, Richard E.</au><au>Metzger, Miriam J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1040997</ericid><atitle>Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy</atitle><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle><stitle>Read Writ</stitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1567</spage><epage>1583</epage><pages>1567-1583</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><coden>REWRE8</coden><abstract>Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11145-014-9507-2</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-4777 |
ispartof | Reading & writing, 2014-10, Vol.27 (9), p.1567-1583 |
issn | 0922-4777 1573-0905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667937367 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Access to Computers Audiences Classrooms College Students Computers Digital imaging Digital literacy Distance learning Education Educational Attainment Educational Experience Educational Technology Essays Internet Knowledge Level Language and Literature Laptop Computers Linguistics Literacy Media Literacy Neurology Observation Prediction Prior Learning Psycholinguistics Questionnaires Reading Ability Social Sciences Websites Word Processing Writing Processes |
title | Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A14%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20and%20processes%20that%20predict%20proficiency%20in%20digital%20literacy&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=Bulger,%20Monica%20E.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1567&rft.epage=1583&rft.pages=1567-1583&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft.coden=REWRE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11145-014-9507-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3421341861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f2b571718d166e4e7cb064c0f329a1c37dccbc6bd7681d5eba3be189479c97d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559514140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1040997&rfr_iscdi=true |