The Limits of Normalization: Taking Stock of the EU-US Comparative Literature

This article contributes to the research on the normalization of European Union (EU) studies by presenting an analysis and assessment of the EU‐US comparative literature. Using an original and comprehensive data set of 104 publications, it shows not only that these comparisons have grown considerabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of common market studies 2014-11, Vol.52 (6), p.1342-1357
Main Author: Tortola, Pier Domenico
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alliances
Comparative analysis
Comparative literature
Comparative Politics
Empirical research
Europe
European Union
Objectivity
Political Science
Scholarship
Stocks
Studies
U.S.A
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article contributes to the research on the normalization of European Union (EU) studies by presenting an analysis and assessment of the EU‐US comparative literature. Using an original and comprehensive data set of 104 publications, it shows not only that these comparisons have grown considerably since the early 1990s, but also and more interestingly that EU‐US scholarship itself has increasingly conformed to mainstream political science by becoming more diverse, causal in nature and empirically inclusive. Unlike other accounts of normalization, however, it is argued here that these transformations are only partly desirable, and that a better direction for the future is to develop EU‐US research as a distinct programme within EU studies, centred on a ‘dual mission’ – theoretical and empirical – that accepts political science's scope and explanatory objectives, but at the same time sees the two cases as worthy of being studied in isolation owing to their importance and the political value of their comparison.
ISSN:0021-9886
1468-5965
DOI:10.1111/jcms.12143