Loading…

Analysis of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Trial Using a Multistate Model of Clinical Outcomes

Current cardiovascular randomized trials typically use composite outcomes. We hypothesized that the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) outcomes and conclusions would differ using a multistate model relative to the intervention for the composite outcome of death (D) and nonfata...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2015-04, Vol.115 (8), p.1073-1079
Main Authors: Zhang, Xiao, PhD, Li, Quanlin, MS, Rogatko, Andre, PhD, Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD, Hardison, Regina M., MS, Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD, Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD, Kaul, Sanjay, MD, Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43
container_end_page 1079
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1073
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 115
creator Zhang, Xiao, PhD
Li, Quanlin, MS
Rogatko, Andre, PhD
Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD
Hardison, Regina M., MS
Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD
Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD
Kaul, Sanjay, MD
Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD
description Current cardiovascular randomized trials typically use composite outcomes. We hypothesized that the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) outcomes and conclusions would differ using a multistate model relative to the intervention for the composite outcome of death (D) and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). We used a multistate model which uses transition paths to simultaneously assess multiple end points. Using the 10-year follow-up BARI data, we post hoc analyzed outcomes according to 3 transition paths: (1) from intervention to MI; (2) from intervention to death; and (3) from MI to death. Of 1,829 patients randomized to the intervention of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 700 (38%) experienced the composite event D/MI which included 230 (13%) nonfatal MI and 470 (26%) death without antecedent nonfatal MI, whereas 79 of 230 (34%) experienced death after nonfatal MI. Outcomes of the 3 individual transition paths were analyzed by a multistate model. In contrast to standard survival analyses, after adjustment for baseline clinical covariates, outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or CABG were not significantly different for intervention to MI (p = 0.33) or intervention to death (p = 0.23), but MI to death favored CABG (p = 0.02). Deconstruction of the BARI data using a multistate model identifies a significant difference in individual transition-stage outcomes and therefore trial conclusions in contrast to the standard methods of survival analysis. These observations suggest multistate models should be considered in the design and analysis of randomized cardiovascular trials which use composite outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.543
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667957549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914915006384</els_id><sourcerecordid>3634677651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxS0EotvCRwBF4sIlwU5sJ76AlhV_KrWqBO3ZcpzJ4uCNt7azUvj0ddgFpF44WSP95s34vUHoFcEFwYS_Gwq1G7TyXVFiwgpMCkarJ2hFmlrkRJDqKVphjMtcECrO0HkIQyoJYfw5OitZXdK6oSt0WI_KzsGEzPVZ_AHZx3mvQsjW49a4vVUhztk3OKigJ6u8-aWicWN2OR4gRLM9VrfeKJvdBTNuM5VdTzaaEFWE7Np1YBfhjTWj0Qm6maJ2Owgv0LNe2QAvT-8Fuvv86XbzNb-6-XK5WV_lmgoWc9rxDjTWoiGM0bZpOTR9h1vRcFErqmsteMW0rvoaWs5LpUlDW9W2DBpc97S6QG-Punvv7qe0s9yZoMFaNYKbgiSc14LVjIqEvnmEDm7yyZ3fVBpTctYkih0p7V0IHnq592an_CwJlkswcpCnYOQSjMREpmBS3-uT-tTuoPvb9SeJBHw4ApDsOBjwMmgDo4bOeNBRds78d8T7Rwr6ZPtPmCH8-40MpcTy-3Idy3EQhjGv0goPMia31w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1666352658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Trial Using a Multistate Model of Clinical Outcomes</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Xiao, PhD ; Li, Quanlin, MS ; Rogatko, Andre, PhD ; Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD ; Hardison, Regina M., MS ; Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD ; Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD ; Kaul, Sanjay, MD ; Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao, PhD ; Li, Quanlin, MS ; Rogatko, Andre, PhD ; Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD ; Hardison, Regina M., MS ; Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD ; Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD ; Kaul, Sanjay, MD ; Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Current cardiovascular randomized trials typically use composite outcomes. We hypothesized that the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) outcomes and conclusions would differ using a multistate model relative to the intervention for the composite outcome of death (D) and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). We used a multistate model which uses transition paths to simultaneously assess multiple end points. Using the 10-year follow-up BARI data, we post hoc analyzed outcomes according to 3 transition paths: (1) from intervention to MI; (2) from intervention to death; and (3) from MI to death. Of 1,829 patients randomized to the intervention of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 700 (38%) experienced the composite event D/MI which included 230 (13%) nonfatal MI and 470 (26%) death without antecedent nonfatal MI, whereas 79 of 230 (34%) experienced death after nonfatal MI. Outcomes of the 3 individual transition paths were analyzed by a multistate model. In contrast to standard survival analyses, after adjustment for baseline clinical covariates, outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or CABG were not significantly different for intervention to MI (p = 0.33) or intervention to death (p = 0.23), but MI to death favored CABG (p = 0.02). Deconstruction of the BARI data using a multistate model identifies a significant difference in individual transition-stage outcomes and therefore trial conclusions in contrast to the standard methods of survival analysis. These observations suggest multistate models should be considered in the design and analysis of randomized cardiovascular trials which use composite outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.543</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25724784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - methods ; Canada - epidemiology ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Cause of Death - trends ; Clinical outcomes ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; Coronary vessels ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Forecasting ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology ; Myocardial Infarction - etiology ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Risk Factors ; Stroke - epidemiology ; Stroke - etiology ; Survival Rate - trends ; Time Factors ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2015-04, Vol.115 (8), p.1073-1079</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 15, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25724784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Quanlin, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogatko, Andre, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardison, Regina M., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Sanjay, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Trial Using a Multistate Model of Clinical Outcomes</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Current cardiovascular randomized trials typically use composite outcomes. We hypothesized that the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) outcomes and conclusions would differ using a multistate model relative to the intervention for the composite outcome of death (D) and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). We used a multistate model which uses transition paths to simultaneously assess multiple end points. Using the 10-year follow-up BARI data, we post hoc analyzed outcomes according to 3 transition paths: (1) from intervention to MI; (2) from intervention to death; and (3) from MI to death. Of 1,829 patients randomized to the intervention of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 700 (38%) experienced the composite event D/MI which included 230 (13%) nonfatal MI and 470 (26%) death without antecedent nonfatal MI, whereas 79 of 230 (34%) experienced death after nonfatal MI. Outcomes of the 3 individual transition paths were analyzed by a multistate model. In contrast to standard survival analyses, after adjustment for baseline clinical covariates, outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or CABG were not significantly different for intervention to MI (p = 0.33) or intervention to death (p = 0.23), but MI to death favored CABG (p = 0.02). Deconstruction of the BARI data using a multistate model identifies a significant difference in individual transition-stage outcomes and therefore trial conclusions in contrast to the standard methods of survival analysis. These observations suggest multistate models should be considered in the design and analysis of randomized cardiovascular trials which use composite outcomes.</description><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - methods</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cause of Death - trends</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - etiology</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stroke - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stroke - etiology</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxS0EotvCRwBF4sIlwU5sJ76AlhV_KrWqBO3ZcpzJ4uCNt7azUvj0ddgFpF44WSP95s34vUHoFcEFwYS_Gwq1G7TyXVFiwgpMCkarJ2hFmlrkRJDqKVphjMtcECrO0HkIQyoJYfw5OitZXdK6oSt0WI_KzsGEzPVZ_AHZx3mvQsjW49a4vVUhztk3OKigJ6u8-aWicWN2OR4gRLM9VrfeKJvdBTNuM5VdTzaaEFWE7Np1YBfhjTWj0Qm6maJ2Owgv0LNe2QAvT-8Fuvv86XbzNb-6-XK5WV_lmgoWc9rxDjTWoiGM0bZpOTR9h1vRcFErqmsteMW0rvoaWs5LpUlDW9W2DBpc97S6QG-Punvv7qe0s9yZoMFaNYKbgiSc14LVjIqEvnmEDm7yyZ3fVBpTctYkih0p7V0IHnq592an_CwJlkswcpCnYOQSjMREpmBS3-uT-tTuoPvb9SeJBHw4ApDsOBjwMmgDo4bOeNBRds78d8T7Rwr6ZPtPmCH8-40MpcTy-3Idy3EQhjGv0goPMia31w</recordid><startdate>20150415</startdate><enddate>20150415</enddate><creator>Zhang, Xiao, PhD</creator><creator>Li, Quanlin, MS</creator><creator>Rogatko, Andre, PhD</creator><creator>Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD</creator><creator>Hardison, Regina M., MS</creator><creator>Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD</creator><creator>Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD</creator><creator>Kaul, Sanjay, MD</creator><creator>Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150415</creationdate><title>Analysis of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Trial Using a Multistate Model of Clinical Outcomes</title><author>Zhang, Xiao, PhD ; Li, Quanlin, MS ; Rogatko, Andre, PhD ; Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD ; Hardison, Regina M., MS ; Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD ; Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD ; Kaul, Sanjay, MD ; Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - methods</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cause of Death - trends</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - etiology</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stroke - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stroke - etiology</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Quanlin, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogatko, Andre, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardison, Regina M., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Sanjay, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Xiao, PhD</au><au>Li, Quanlin, MS</au><au>Rogatko, Andre, PhD</au><au>Tighiouart, Mourad, PhD</au><au>Hardison, Regina M., MS</au><au>Brooks, Maria Mori, PhD</au><au>Kelsey, Sheryl F., PhD</au><au>Kaul, Sanjay, MD</au><au>Bairey Merz, C. Noel, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Trial Using a Multistate Model of Clinical Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2015-04-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1079</epage><pages>1073-1079</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>Current cardiovascular randomized trials typically use composite outcomes. We hypothesized that the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) outcomes and conclusions would differ using a multistate model relative to the intervention for the composite outcome of death (D) and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). We used a multistate model which uses transition paths to simultaneously assess multiple end points. Using the 10-year follow-up BARI data, we post hoc analyzed outcomes according to 3 transition paths: (1) from intervention to MI; (2) from intervention to death; and (3) from MI to death. Of 1,829 patients randomized to the intervention of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 700 (38%) experienced the composite event D/MI which included 230 (13%) nonfatal MI and 470 (26%) death without antecedent nonfatal MI, whereas 79 of 230 (34%) experienced death after nonfatal MI. Outcomes of the 3 individual transition paths were analyzed by a multistate model. In contrast to standard survival analyses, after adjustment for baseline clinical covariates, outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or CABG were not significantly different for intervention to MI (p = 0.33) or intervention to death (p = 0.23), but MI to death favored CABG (p = 0.02). Deconstruction of the BARI data using a multistate model identifies a significant difference in individual transition-stage outcomes and therefore trial conclusions in contrast to the standard methods of survival analysis. These observations suggest multistate models should be considered in the design and analysis of randomized cardiovascular trials which use composite outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25724784</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.543</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2015-04, Vol.115 (8), p.1073-1079
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1667957549
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Angioplasty
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - methods
Canada - epidemiology
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Cause of Death - trends
Clinical outcomes
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis
Coronary Artery Disease - surgery
Coronary vessels
Electrocardiography
Female
Forecasting
Heart attacks
Humans
Incidence
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Myocardial Infarction - epidemiology
Myocardial Infarction - etiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Risk Factors
Stroke - epidemiology
Stroke - etiology
Survival Rate - trends
Time Factors
United States - epidemiology
title Analysis of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Trial Using a Multistate Model of Clinical Outcomes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20the%20Bypass%20Angioplasty%20Revascularization%20Investigation%20Trial%20Using%20a%20Multistate%20Model%20of%20Clinical%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Zhang,%20Xiao,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-04-15&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1079&rft.pages=1073-1079&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3634677651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4d6dec0c981554b8b6e8fd0b98697a4c7c9635cc3f7eb662ac184babb5e807f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1666352658&rft_id=info:pmid/25724784&rfr_iscdi=true