Loading…
Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Bevacizumab blocks the effects of VEGF and may allow for more aggressive radiotherapy schedules. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. P...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neuro-oncology 2015-03, Vol.122 (1), p.135-143 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53 |
container_end_page | 143 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Journal of neuro-oncology |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Ney, Douglas E. Carlson, Julie A. Damek, Denise M. Gaspar, Laurie E. Kavanagh, Brian D. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K. Waziri, Allen E. Lillehei, Kevin O. Reddy, Krishna Chen, Changhu |
description | Bevacizumab blocks the effects of VEGF and may allow for more aggressive radiotherapy schedules. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were treated with hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to the surgical cavity and residual tumor with a 1 cm margin (PTV1) to 60 Gy and to the T2 abnormality with a 1 cm margin (PTV2) to 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks. Concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m
2
daily) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was administered followed by adjuvant temozolomide (200 mg/m
2
) on a standard 5/28 day cycle and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for 6 months. Thirty newly diagnosed patients were treated on study. Median PTV1 volume was 131.1 cm
3
and the median PTV2 volume was 342.6 cm
3
. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 90 %, with median follow-up of 15.9 months. The median PFS was 14.3 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 16.3 months. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (10 %) and thrombocytopenia (17 %). Grades 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (13 %), wound dehiscence (7 %) and stroke, pulmonary embolism and nausea each in 1 patient. Presumed radiation necrosis with clinical decline was seen in 50 % of patients, two with autopsy documentation. The study was closed early to accrual due to this finding. This study demonstrated 90 % 6-month PFS and OS comparable to historic data in patients receiving standard treatment. Bevacizumab did not prevent radiation necrosis associated with this hypofractionated radiation regimen and large PTV volumes may have contributed to high rates of presumed radiation necrosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11060-014-1691-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668249228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3618637111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAYRS0EokPhAdggS2zYhPovcbJEVYGRKtFFF-wi_2XGlWMH26HKPE6fFIeUCiGxsuTv3GvrOwC8xegjRohfJIxRgyqEWYWbDlenZ2CHa04rTjl9DnYIN7yqO_b9DLxK6Q4hxDjFL8EZqWvCWsx34OHmKJKB-z3M0QoHwwCPyxSGKFS2wYtsNLQ-G59sXqox6Nn9votCW7ESMB9NFNMCVRil9WV0b_MRZjOGU3BhtNpA4TWU5qdQ9jSPQsIhRDiVtPE5bbg3926BpfLgQyodB2eDdCLlMIrX4MUgXDJvHs9zcPv56vbya3X97cv-8tN1pRivczVoIbnmWg-G8g63jTSE4LrlapBMcSWp6LRuJCWI4LIHTeuG0qbsoR2oquk5-LDVTjH8mE3K_WiTMs4Jb8Kcetw0LWEdIW1B3_-D3oU5-vK5lcI1YwytFN4oFUNK0Qz9FO0o4tJj1K_--s1fX_z1q7_-VDLvHptnORr9lPgjrABkA1IZ-YOJfz3939ZfZ7yqrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661544408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ney, Douglas E. ; Carlson, Julie A. ; Damek, Denise M. ; Gaspar, Laurie E. ; Kavanagh, Brian D. ; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K. ; Waziri, Allen E. ; Lillehei, Kevin O. ; Reddy, Krishna ; Chen, Changhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Ney, Douglas E. ; Carlson, Julie A. ; Damek, Denise M. ; Gaspar, Laurie E. ; Kavanagh, Brian D. ; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K. ; Waziri, Allen E. ; Lillehei, Kevin O. ; Reddy, Krishna ; Chen, Changhu</creatorcontrib><description>Bevacizumab blocks the effects of VEGF and may allow for more aggressive radiotherapy schedules. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were treated with hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to the surgical cavity and residual tumor with a 1 cm margin (PTV1) to 60 Gy and to the T2 abnormality with a 1 cm margin (PTV2) to 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks. Concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m
2
daily) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was administered followed by adjuvant temozolomide (200 mg/m
2
) on a standard 5/28 day cycle and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for 6 months. Thirty newly diagnosed patients were treated on study. Median PTV1 volume was 131.1 cm
3
and the median PTV2 volume was 342.6 cm
3
. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 90 %, with median follow-up of 15.9 months. The median PFS was 14.3 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 16.3 months. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (10 %) and thrombocytopenia (17 %). Grades 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (13 %), wound dehiscence (7 %) and stroke, pulmonary embolism and nausea each in 1 patient. Presumed radiation necrosis with clinical decline was seen in 50 % of patients, two with autopsy documentation. The study was closed early to accrual due to this finding. This study demonstrated 90 % 6-month PFS and OS comparable to historic data in patients receiving standard treatment. Bevacizumab did not prevent radiation necrosis associated with this hypofractionated radiation regimen and large PTV volumes may have contributed to high rates of presumed radiation necrosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-594X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1691-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25524817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab - administration & dosage ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Brain Neoplasms - mortality ; Brain Neoplasms - therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Clinical Study ; Dacarbazine - administration & dosage ; Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives ; Dose Fractionation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glioblastoma - diagnosis ; Glioblastoma - mortality ; Glioblastoma - therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neurology ; Oncology ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015-03, Vol.122 (1), p.135-143</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ney, Douglas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damek, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Laurie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waziri, Allen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehei, Kevin O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Changhu</creatorcontrib><title>Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma</title><title>Journal of neuro-oncology</title><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><description>Bevacizumab blocks the effects of VEGF and may allow for more aggressive radiotherapy schedules. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were treated with hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to the surgical cavity and residual tumor with a 1 cm margin (PTV1) to 60 Gy and to the T2 abnormality with a 1 cm margin (PTV2) to 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks. Concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m
2
daily) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was administered followed by adjuvant temozolomide (200 mg/m
2
) on a standard 5/28 day cycle and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for 6 months. Thirty newly diagnosed patients were treated on study. Median PTV1 volume was 131.1 cm
3
and the median PTV2 volume was 342.6 cm
3
. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 90 %, with median follow-up of 15.9 months. The median PFS was 14.3 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 16.3 months. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (10 %) and thrombocytopenia (17 %). Grades 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (13 %), wound dehiscence (7 %) and stroke, pulmonary embolism and nausea each in 1 patient. Presumed radiation necrosis with clinical decline was seen in 50 % of patients, two with autopsy documentation. The study was closed early to accrual due to this finding. This study demonstrated 90 % 6-month PFS and OS comparable to historic data in patients receiving standard treatment. Bevacizumab did not prevent radiation necrosis associated with this hypofractionated radiation regimen and large PTV volumes may have contributed to high rates of presumed radiation necrosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bevacizumab - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Dacarbazine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - mortality</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0167-594X</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAYRS0EokPhAdggS2zYhPovcbJEVYGRKtFFF-wi_2XGlWMH26HKPE6fFIeUCiGxsuTv3GvrOwC8xegjRohfJIxRgyqEWYWbDlenZ2CHa04rTjl9DnYIN7yqO_b9DLxK6Q4hxDjFL8EZqWvCWsx34OHmKJKB-z3M0QoHwwCPyxSGKFS2wYtsNLQ-G59sXqox6Nn9votCW7ESMB9NFNMCVRil9WV0b_MRZjOGU3BhtNpA4TWU5qdQ9jSPQsIhRDiVtPE5bbg3926BpfLgQyodB2eDdCLlMIrX4MUgXDJvHs9zcPv56vbya3X97cv-8tN1pRivczVoIbnmWg-G8g63jTSE4LrlapBMcSWp6LRuJCWI4LIHTeuG0qbsoR2oquk5-LDVTjH8mE3K_WiTMs4Jb8Kcetw0LWEdIW1B3_-D3oU5-vK5lcI1YwytFN4oFUNK0Qz9FO0o4tJj1K_--s1fX_z1q7_-VDLvHptnORr9lPgjrABkA1IZ-YOJfz3939ZfZ7yqrQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Ney, Douglas E.</creator><creator>Carlson, Julie A.</creator><creator>Damek, Denise M.</creator><creator>Gaspar, Laurie E.</creator><creator>Kavanagh, Brian D.</creator><creator>Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K.</creator><creator>Waziri, Allen E.</creator><creator>Lillehei, Kevin O.</creator><creator>Reddy, Krishna</creator><creator>Chen, Changhu</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma</title><author>Ney, Douglas E. ; Carlson, Julie A. ; Damek, Denise M. ; Gaspar, Laurie E. ; Kavanagh, Brian D. ; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K. ; Waziri, Allen E. ; Lillehei, Kevin O. ; Reddy, Krishna ; Chen, Changhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bevacizumab - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Dacarbazine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - mortality</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ney, Douglas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damek, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Laurie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waziri, Allen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehei, Kevin O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Changhu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ney, Douglas E.</au><au>Carlson, Julie A.</au><au>Damek, Denise M.</au><au>Gaspar, Laurie E.</au><au>Kavanagh, Brian D.</au><au>Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K.</au><au>Waziri, Allen E.</au><au>Lillehei, Kevin O.</au><au>Reddy, Krishna</au><au>Chen, Changhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurooncol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>135-143</pages><issn>0167-594X</issn><eissn>1573-7373</eissn><abstract>Bevacizumab blocks the effects of VEGF and may allow for more aggressive radiotherapy schedules. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were treated with hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to the surgical cavity and residual tumor with a 1 cm margin (PTV1) to 60 Gy and to the T2 abnormality with a 1 cm margin (PTV2) to 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks. Concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m
2
daily) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) was administered followed by adjuvant temozolomide (200 mg/m
2
) on a standard 5/28 day cycle and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for 6 months. Thirty newly diagnosed patients were treated on study. Median PTV1 volume was 131.1 cm
3
and the median PTV2 volume was 342.6 cm
3
. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 90 %, with median follow-up of 15.9 months. The median PFS was 14.3 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 16.3 months. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (10 %) and thrombocytopenia (17 %). Grades 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (13 %), wound dehiscence (7 %) and stroke, pulmonary embolism and nausea each in 1 patient. Presumed radiation necrosis with clinical decline was seen in 50 % of patients, two with autopsy documentation. The study was closed early to accrual due to this finding. This study demonstrated 90 % 6-month PFS and OS comparable to historic data in patients receiving standard treatment. Bevacizumab did not prevent radiation necrosis associated with this hypofractionated radiation regimen and large PTV volumes may have contributed to high rates of presumed radiation necrosis.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25524817</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11060-014-1691-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-594X |
ispartof | Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015-03, Vol.122 (1), p.135-143 |
issn | 0167-594X 1573-7373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668249228 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Bevacizumab - administration & dosage Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis Brain Neoplasms - mortality Brain Neoplasms - therapy Chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Clinical Study Dacarbazine - administration & dosage Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives Dose Fractionation Female Follow-Up Studies Glioblastoma - diagnosis Glioblastoma - mortality Glioblastoma - therapy Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Neurology Oncology Prognosis Prospective Studies Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Survival Rate |
title | Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T13%3A37%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20II%20trial%20of%20hypofractionated%20intensity-modulated%20radiation%20therapy%20combined%20with%20temozolomide%20and%20bevacizumab%20for%20patients%20with%20newly%20diagnosed%20glioblastoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuro-oncology&rft.au=Ney,%20Douglas%20E.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=135-143&rft.issn=0167-594X&rft.eissn=1573-7373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11060-014-1691-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3618637111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fdab7d7ddfe379186be221587cfb4c7cb3a9dd6b32021473d3563362488f3c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661544408&rft_id=info:pmid/25524817&rfr_iscdi=true |