Loading…

Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction

A key measure of humanity's global impact is by how much it has increased species extinction rates. Familiar statements are that these are 100–1000 times pre‐human or background extinction levels. Estimating recent rates is straightforward, but establishing a background rate for comparison is n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation biology 2015-04, Vol.29 (2), p.452-462
Main Authors: De Vos, Jurriaan M, Joppa, Lucas N, Gittleman, John L, Stephens, Patrick R, Pimm, Stuart L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733
container_end_page 462
container_issue 2
container_start_page 452
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 29
creator De Vos, Jurriaan M
Joppa, Lucas N
Gittleman, John L
Stephens, Patrick R
Pimm, Stuart L
description A key measure of humanity's global impact is by how much it has increased species extinction rates. Familiar statements are that these are 100–1000 times pre‐human or background extinction levels. Estimating recent rates is straightforward, but establishing a background rate for comparison is not. Previous researchers chose an approximate benchmark of 1 extinction per million species per year (E/MSY). We explored disparate lines of evidence that suggest a substantially lower estimate. Fossil data yield direct estimates of extinction rates, but they are temporally coarse, mostly limited to marine hard‐bodied taxa, and generally involve genera not species. Based on these data, typical background loss is 0.01 genera per million genera per year. Molecular phylogenies are available for more taxa and ecosystems, but it is debated whether they can be used to estimate separately speciation and extinction rates. We selected data to address known concerns and used them to determine median extinction estimates from statistical distributions of probable values for terrestrial plants and animals. We then created simulations to explore effects of violating model assumptions. Finally, we compiled estimates of diversification—the difference between speciation and extinction rates for different taxa. Median estimates of extinction rates ranged from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY. Simulation results suggested over‐ and under‐estimation of extinction from individual phylogenies partially canceled each other out when large sets of phylogenies were analyzed. There was no evidence for recent and widespread pre‐human overall declines in diversity. This implies that average extinction rates are less than average diversification rates. Median diversification rates were 0.05–0.2 new species per million species per year. On the basis of these results, we concluded that typical rates of background extinction may be closer to 0.1 E/MSY. Thus, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than natural background rates of extinction and future rates are likely to be 10,000 times higher.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cobi.12380
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668265447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24482652</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24482652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1rFTEUBuAgir1WN_4AHRBBhKknmWSS0JW9rbVQWkotXYZ8zXVu506uyQy2_96M0xZxIWZzNs95w3kReo1hD-f3yQbT7mFSCXiCFpiRqsS8kk_RAoQQpRCS7KAXKa0BQDJMn6MdwjCTIOoF2j9KQ7vRQ9uviuG7L_oQN7orjLY3qxjG3hVRD74ITZG23rY-Ff42Yzu0oX-JnjW6S_7V_dxFV1-Ovi2_lqfnxyfLz6elrRmFUoAxpKEaO-OsMYJxKjA3DFvnObiGsEbrxmHQBmxNjZXSW0nrijvnLK-qXfRhzt3G8GP0aVCbNlnfdbr3YUwK17Ug-SvK_4dSAgQkzfTdX3QdxtjnQyZFRDZ8Cvw4KxtDStE3ahtzX_FOYVBT-2pqX_1uP-M395Gj2Xj3SB_qzgDP4Gfb-bt_RKnl-cHJQ-j7eWedhhD_3CEVcEUonY4n2ZWza9Pgbx-djjeq5hVn6vrsWB1e04vDi4NLdZb929k3Oii9im1SV5cEMAPAknDGq1_j-bJm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662809477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>De Vos, Jurriaan M ; Joppa, Lucas N ; Gittleman, John L ; Stephens, Patrick R ; Pimm, Stuart L</creator><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Jurriaan M ; Joppa, Lucas N ; Gittleman, John L ; Stephens, Patrick R ; Pimm, Stuart L</creatorcontrib><description>A key measure of humanity's global impact is by how much it has increased species extinction rates. Familiar statements are that these are 100–1000 times pre‐human or background extinction levels. Estimating recent rates is straightforward, but establishing a background rate for comparison is not. Previous researchers chose an approximate benchmark of 1 extinction per million species per year (E/MSY). We explored disparate lines of evidence that suggest a substantially lower estimate. Fossil data yield direct estimates of extinction rates, but they are temporally coarse, mostly limited to marine hard‐bodied taxa, and generally involve genera not species. Based on these data, typical background loss is 0.01 genera per million genera per year. Molecular phylogenies are available for more taxa and ecosystems, but it is debated whether they can be used to estimate separately speciation and extinction rates. We selected data to address known concerns and used them to determine median extinction estimates from statistical distributions of probable values for terrestrial plants and animals. We then created simulations to explore effects of violating model assumptions. Finally, we compiled estimates of diversification—the difference between speciation and extinction rates for different taxa. Median estimates of extinction rates ranged from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY. Simulation results suggested over‐ and under‐estimation of extinction from individual phylogenies partially canceled each other out when large sets of phylogenies were analyzed. There was no evidence for recent and widespread pre‐human overall declines in diversity. This implies that average extinction rates are less than average diversification rates. Median diversification rates were 0.05–0.2 new species per million species per year. On the basis of these results, we concluded that typical rates of background extinction may be closer to 0.1 E/MSY. Thus, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than natural background rates of extinction and future rates are likely to be 10,000 times higher.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12380</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25159086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Chordata ; Computer Simulation ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Contributed Papers ; diversification rates ; ecosystems ; Estimating techniques ; Extinction ; extinction rate ; Extinction, Biological ; filogenias moleculares ; fossil record ; Fossils ; Invertebrates ; linajes a través del tiempo ; lineages through time ; Models, Biological ; molecular phylogenies ; new species ; Phylogeny ; Plants ; plants (botany) ; registro fósil ; tasa de diversificación ; tasa de extinción</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2015-04, Vol.29 (2), p.452-462</ispartof><rights>2015 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2014 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2014 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2015, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24482652$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24482652$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Jurriaan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joppa, Lucas N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gittleman, John L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimm, Stuart L</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>A key measure of humanity's global impact is by how much it has increased species extinction rates. Familiar statements are that these are 100–1000 times pre‐human or background extinction levels. Estimating recent rates is straightforward, but establishing a background rate for comparison is not. Previous researchers chose an approximate benchmark of 1 extinction per million species per year (E/MSY). We explored disparate lines of evidence that suggest a substantially lower estimate. Fossil data yield direct estimates of extinction rates, but they are temporally coarse, mostly limited to marine hard‐bodied taxa, and generally involve genera not species. Based on these data, typical background loss is 0.01 genera per million genera per year. Molecular phylogenies are available for more taxa and ecosystems, but it is debated whether they can be used to estimate separately speciation and extinction rates. We selected data to address known concerns and used them to determine median extinction estimates from statistical distributions of probable values for terrestrial plants and animals. We then created simulations to explore effects of violating model assumptions. Finally, we compiled estimates of diversification—the difference between speciation and extinction rates for different taxa. Median estimates of extinction rates ranged from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY. Simulation results suggested over‐ and under‐estimation of extinction from individual phylogenies partially canceled each other out when large sets of phylogenies were analyzed. There was no evidence for recent and widespread pre‐human overall declines in diversity. This implies that average extinction rates are less than average diversification rates. Median diversification rates were 0.05–0.2 new species per million species per year. On the basis of these results, we concluded that typical rates of background extinction may be closer to 0.1 E/MSY. Thus, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than natural background rates of extinction and future rates are likely to be 10,000 times higher.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Chordata</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Contributed Papers</subject><subject>diversification rates</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimating techniques</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>extinction rate</subject><subject>Extinction, Biological</subject><subject>filogenias moleculares</subject><subject>fossil record</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>linajes a través del tiempo</subject><subject>lineages through time</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>molecular phylogenies</subject><subject>new species</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>plants (botany)</subject><subject>registro fósil</subject><subject>tasa de diversificación</subject><subject>tasa de extinción</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1rFTEUBuAgir1WN_4AHRBBhKknmWSS0JW9rbVQWkotXYZ8zXVu506uyQy2_96M0xZxIWZzNs95w3kReo1hD-f3yQbT7mFSCXiCFpiRqsS8kk_RAoQQpRCS7KAXKa0BQDJMn6MdwjCTIOoF2j9KQ7vRQ9uviuG7L_oQN7orjLY3qxjG3hVRD74ITZG23rY-Ff42Yzu0oX-JnjW6S_7V_dxFV1-Ovi2_lqfnxyfLz6elrRmFUoAxpKEaO-OsMYJxKjA3DFvnObiGsEbrxmHQBmxNjZXSW0nrijvnLK-qXfRhzt3G8GP0aVCbNlnfdbr3YUwK17Ug-SvK_4dSAgQkzfTdX3QdxtjnQyZFRDZ8Cvw4KxtDStE3ahtzX_FOYVBT-2pqX_1uP-M395Gj2Xj3SB_qzgDP4Gfb-bt_RKnl-cHJQ-j7eWedhhD_3CEVcEUonY4n2ZWza9Pgbx-djjeq5hVn6vrsWB1e04vDi4NLdZb929k3Oii9im1SV5cEMAPAknDGq1_j-bJm</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>De Vos, Jurriaan M</creator><creator>Joppa, Lucas N</creator><creator>Gittleman, John L</creator><creator>Stephens, Patrick R</creator><creator>Pimm, Stuart L</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction</title><author>De Vos, Jurriaan M ; Joppa, Lucas N ; Gittleman, John L ; Stephens, Patrick R ; Pimm, Stuart L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Chordata</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Contributed Papers</topic><topic>diversification rates</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimating techniques</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>extinction rate</topic><topic>Extinction, Biological</topic><topic>filogenias moleculares</topic><topic>fossil record</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>linajes a través del tiempo</topic><topic>lineages through time</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>molecular phylogenies</topic><topic>new species</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>plants (botany)</topic><topic>registro fósil</topic><topic>tasa de diversificación</topic><topic>tasa de extinción</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Jurriaan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joppa, Lucas N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gittleman, John L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Patrick R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimm, Stuart L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Vos, Jurriaan M</au><au>Joppa, Lucas N</au><au>Gittleman, John L</au><au>Stephens, Patrick R</au><au>Pimm, Stuart L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>452-462</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>A key measure of humanity's global impact is by how much it has increased species extinction rates. Familiar statements are that these are 100–1000 times pre‐human or background extinction levels. Estimating recent rates is straightforward, but establishing a background rate for comparison is not. Previous researchers chose an approximate benchmark of 1 extinction per million species per year (E/MSY). We explored disparate lines of evidence that suggest a substantially lower estimate. Fossil data yield direct estimates of extinction rates, but they are temporally coarse, mostly limited to marine hard‐bodied taxa, and generally involve genera not species. Based on these data, typical background loss is 0.01 genera per million genera per year. Molecular phylogenies are available for more taxa and ecosystems, but it is debated whether they can be used to estimate separately speciation and extinction rates. We selected data to address known concerns and used them to determine median extinction estimates from statistical distributions of probable values for terrestrial plants and animals. We then created simulations to explore effects of violating model assumptions. Finally, we compiled estimates of diversification—the difference between speciation and extinction rates for different taxa. Median estimates of extinction rates ranged from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY. Simulation results suggested over‐ and under‐estimation of extinction from individual phylogenies partially canceled each other out when large sets of phylogenies were analyzed. There was no evidence for recent and widespread pre‐human overall declines in diversity. This implies that average extinction rates are less than average diversification rates. Median diversification rates were 0.05–0.2 new species per million species per year. On the basis of these results, we concluded that typical rates of background extinction may be closer to 0.1 E/MSY. Thus, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than natural background rates of extinction and future rates are likely to be 10,000 times higher.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publications</pub><pmid>25159086</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12380</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2015-04, Vol.29 (2), p.452-462
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1668265447
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animals
Biological Evolution
Chordata
Computer Simulation
Conservation biology
Conservation of Natural Resources
Contributed Papers
diversification rates
ecosystems
Estimating techniques
Extinction
extinction rate
Extinction, Biological
filogenias moleculares
fossil record
Fossils
Invertebrates
linajes a través del tiempo
lineages through time
Models, Biological
molecular phylogenies
new species
Phylogeny
Plants
plants (botany)
registro fósil
tasa de diversificación
tasa de extinción
title Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A36%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20normal%20background%20rate%20of%20species%20extinction&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=De%20Vos,%20Jurriaan%20M&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=452-462&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12380&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24482652%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6540-80bb2f4a1dbdcbb8574817b51cde70df25faafd10ab0c64bc99ec94637dddc733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662809477&rft_id=info:pmid/25159086&rft_jstor_id=24482652&rfr_iscdi=true