Clinical impact of a novel three-dimensional electrocardiographic imaging for non-invasive mapping of ventricular arrhythmias-a prospective randomized trial

• Published in: Europace (London, England) England), 2015-04, Vol.17 (4), p.591-597
• Main Authors: Erkapic, Damir, Greiss, Harald, Pajitnev, Dmitri, Zaltsberg, Sergey, Deubner, Nicolas, Berkowitsch, Alexander, Möllman, Susanne, Sperzel, Johannes, Rolf, Andreas, Schmitt, Jörn, Hamm, Christian W, Kuniss, Malte, Neumann, Thomas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Body Surface Potential Mapping - methods; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods; Electrocardiography - methods; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis; Ventricular Premature Complexes - diagnosis
• ISSN: 1099-5129; 1532-2092
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu282

ECVUE™ technology, a novel, three-dimensional, non-invasive mapping system, offers a unique arrhythmia characterization and localization. We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of this system in routine clinical mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Patients with monomorphic premature ventricular contractions with or without monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were enrolled prospectively and randomized into two groups: ventricular ectopy localization using either 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithms or with ECVUE™, followed by conventional guided ablation. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The ECVUE™ system accurately identified both the chamber and sub-localized the VA origin in 20 of 21 (95.2%) patients. In contrast, using 12-lead ECG algorithms, the chamber was accurately diagnosed in 16 of 21 (76.2%) patients, while the arrhythmia origin in only 8 of 21 (38.1%), (P = 0.001 vs. ECVUE™). Acute success in ablation was achieved in all patients. Regarding the number of radiofrequency-energy applications (in total 2 vs. 4, P = 0.005) in the ECVUE™ arm, ablation was more precise than the ECG group which used standard of care activation and pace mapping-guided ablation. Three months success in ablation was 95.2% for the ECVUE™ and 100% for the ECG group (P = ns). Time to ablation was 35.3 min in the conventional arm and 24.4 min in ECVUE Group, (P = 0.035). The X-ray radiation exposure was 3.21 vs. 0.39 mSv, P = 0.001 for the ECVUE™ group and ECG group. ECVUE™ technology offers a clinically useful tool to map VAs with high accuracy and more targeted ablations superior to the body surface ECG but had significantly higher radiation exposure due to computed tomography scan.