Comparative Analysis of Different Mobility Protocols for VHO based on MIH Standards

Mobile user service continuity across heterogeneous wireless access network is a challenging task for designing future generation wireless networks. Existing communication platforms may efficiently utilize heterogeneous architecture rather homogeneous solution for both non-real-time and real-time ap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of computer applications 2015-01, Vol.109 (15), p.33-38
Main Authors: Tamijetchelvy, R, Hepzibah, C, Sivaradje, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Continuity
Mobile communication systems
Networks
Protocol (computers)
Tasks
Wireless communication
Wireless networks
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 38
container_issue 15
container_start_page 33
container_title International journal of computer applications
container_volume 109
creator Tamijetchelvy, R
Hepzibah, C
Sivaradje, G
description Mobile user service continuity across heterogeneous wireless access network is a challenging task for designing future generation wireless networks. Existing communication platforms may efficiently utilize heterogeneous architecture rather homogeneous solution for both non-real-time and real-time applications. Such seamless service continuity is obtained by proper vertical handover algorithms and mobility protocols across various layers to satisfy the user needs. Therefore, efficient standards are necessary for maintaining service quality in heterogeneous networks. One such standard is IEEE 802. 21 MIH which provides media-independent framework and associated services to enable seamless handover between heterogeneous networks. In this paper different mobility management protocols such as PMIPv6, MIPv6, HMIPv6 and FMIPv6 are analyzed, implemented and compared for integrated WLAN / WiMAX networks in terms handover latency and throughput.
doi_str_mv 10.5120/19268-1044
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669855378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1669855378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1324-a599f4e6b16a0ad07a7a67358f65064da428837640beff1147130692323cedc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0MtKw0AUBuBBFCy1G59gwI0I0blflqVeWmipUHUbTpIZSEkzdSYV8vam1oV4NucsPn44P0LXlNxLysgDtUyZjBIhztCIWC0zY4w-_3NfoklKWzIMH6wVI7SZhd0eInT1l8PTFpo-1QkHjx9r7110bYdXoaibuuvxawxdKEOTsA8Rf8zXuIDkKhxavFrM8aaDtoJYpSt04aFJbvK7x-j9-eltNs-W65fFbLrMSsqZyEBa64VTBVVAoCIaNCjNpfFKEiUqEMwYrpUghfOeUqEpJ8oyznjpqlLxMbo95e5j-Dy41OW7OpWuaaB14ZByqpQ1UnJtBnrzj27DIQ7vHpWUWljF2KDuTqqMIaXofL6P9Q5in1OSHyvOfyrOjxXzb6M6as0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655749622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Different Mobility Protocols for VHO based on MIH Standards</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Tamijetchelvy, R ; Hepzibah, C ; Sivaradje, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamijetchelvy, R ; Hepzibah, C ; Sivaradje, G</creatorcontrib><description>Mobile user service continuity across heterogeneous wireless access network is a challenging task for designing future generation wireless networks. Existing communication platforms may efficiently utilize heterogeneous architecture rather homogeneous solution for both non-real-time and real-time applications. Such seamless service continuity is obtained by proper vertical handover algorithms and mobility protocols across various layers to satisfy the user needs. Therefore, efficient standards are necessary for maintaining service quality in heterogeneous networks. One such standard is IEEE 802. 21 MIH which provides media-independent framework and associated services to enable seamless handover between heterogeneous networks. In this paper different mobility management protocols such as PMIPv6, MIPv6, HMIPv6 and FMIPv6 are analyzed, implemented and compared for integrated WLAN / WiMAX networks in terms handover latency and throughput.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0975-8887</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-8887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5120/19268-1044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Foundation of Computer Science</publisher><subject>Continuity ; Mobile communication systems ; Networks ; Protocol (computers) ; Tasks ; Wireless communication ; Wireless networks</subject><ispartof>International journal of computer applications, 2015-01, Vol.109 (15), p.33-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright Foundation of Computer Science 2015</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamijetchelvy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepzibah, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaradje, G</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Different Mobility Protocols for VHO based on MIH Standards</title><title>International journal of computer applications</title><description>Mobile user service continuity across heterogeneous wireless access network is a challenging task for designing future generation wireless networks. Existing communication platforms may efficiently utilize heterogeneous architecture rather homogeneous solution for both non-real-time and real-time applications. Such seamless service continuity is obtained by proper vertical handover algorithms and mobility protocols across various layers to satisfy the user needs. Therefore, efficient standards are necessary for maintaining service quality in heterogeneous networks. One such standard is IEEE 802. 21 MIH which provides media-independent framework and associated services to enable seamless handover between heterogeneous networks. In this paper different mobility management protocols such as PMIPv6, MIPv6, HMIPv6 and FMIPv6 are analyzed, implemented and compared for integrated WLAN / WiMAX networks in terms handover latency and throughput.</description><subject>Continuity</subject><subject>Mobile communication systems</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Protocol (computers)</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><subject>Wireless networks</subject><issn>0975-8887</issn><issn>0975-8887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0MtKw0AUBuBBFCy1G59gwI0I0blflqVeWmipUHUbTpIZSEkzdSYV8vam1oV4NucsPn44P0LXlNxLysgDtUyZjBIhztCIWC0zY4w-_3NfoklKWzIMH6wVI7SZhd0eInT1l8PTFpo-1QkHjx9r7110bYdXoaibuuvxawxdKEOTsA8Rf8zXuIDkKhxavFrM8aaDtoJYpSt04aFJbvK7x-j9-eltNs-W65fFbLrMSsqZyEBa64VTBVVAoCIaNCjNpfFKEiUqEMwYrpUghfOeUqEpJ8oyznjpqlLxMbo95e5j-Dy41OW7OpWuaaB14ZByqpQ1UnJtBnrzj27DIQ7vHpWUWljF2KDuTqqMIaXofL6P9Q5in1OSHyvOfyrOjxXzb6M6as0</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Tamijetchelvy, R</creator><creator>Hepzibah, C</creator><creator>Sivaradje, G</creator><general>Foundation of Computer Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Different Mobility Protocols for VHO based on MIH Standards</title><author>Tamijetchelvy, R ; Hepzibah, C ; Sivaradje, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1324-a599f4e6b16a0ad07a7a67358f65064da428837640beff1147130692323cedc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Continuity</topic><topic>Mobile communication systems</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Protocol (computers)</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><topic>Wireless networks</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamijetchelvy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepzibah, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivaradje, G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of computer applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamijetchelvy, R</au><au>Hepzibah, C</au><au>Sivaradje, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Different Mobility Protocols for VHO based on MIH Standards</atitle><jtitle>International journal of computer applications</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>33-38</pages><issn>0975-8887</issn><eissn>0975-8887</eissn><abstract>Mobile user service continuity across heterogeneous wireless access network is a challenging task for designing future generation wireless networks. Existing communication platforms may efficiently utilize heterogeneous architecture rather homogeneous solution for both non-real-time and real-time applications. Such seamless service continuity is obtained by proper vertical handover algorithms and mobility protocols across various layers to satisfy the user needs. Therefore, efficient standards are necessary for maintaining service quality in heterogeneous networks. One such standard is IEEE 802. 21 MIH which provides media-independent framework and associated services to enable seamless handover between heterogeneous networks. In this paper different mobility management protocols such as PMIPv6, MIPv6, HMIPv6 and FMIPv6 are analyzed, implemented and compared for integrated WLAN / WiMAX networks in terms handover latency and throughput.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Foundation of Computer Science</pub><doi>10.5120/19268-1044</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0975-8887
ispartof International journal of computer applications, 2015-01, Vol.109 (15), p.33-38
issn 0975-8887
0975-8887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669855378
source Freely Accessible Journals
subjects Continuity
Mobile communication systems
Networks
Protocol (computers)
Tasks
Wireless communication
Wireless networks
title Comparative Analysis of Different Mobility Protocols for VHO based on MIH Standards
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T09%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Different%20Mobility%20Protocols%20for%20VHO%20based%20on%20MIH%20Standards&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20computer%20applications&rft.au=Tamijetchelvy,%20R&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=33-38&rft.issn=0975-8887&rft.eissn=0975-8887&rft_id=info:doi/10.5120/19268-1044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669855378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1324-a599f4e6b16a0ad07a7a67358f65064da428837640beff1147130692323cedc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655749622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true