Loading…

What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?

A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constitu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2015-01, Vol.120 (1), p.229-239
Main Authors: Leinonen, J., Moisseev, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553
container_end_page 239
container_issue 1
container_start_page 229
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 120
creator Leinonen, J.
Moisseev, D.
description A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms. Key Points The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2014JD022072
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669861050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660398467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFLwzAUB_AiCop68wMUvHiwmjR5SXsSmbo5hw6Z6C1k2Wutdu1MWue-vRkVEQ9iLgnk9x7_xwuCA0pOKCHxaUwoH16QOCYy3gh2YirSKElTsfn9lk_bwb5zL8SfhDAOfCcYPT7rJpzVYWOLRYlRZvGtxcqsQqtn2oauyCvdtBZdaPEddRnqad02oc5zi7luMHRVvcxK_YrubC_YynTpcP_r3g0eri4nvUE0uutf985HkQEuZWSQZ4AGKRhtAHgiCKUpipmGaQw808IAYzwl4D8ZTQmPGTPZFKQQyAHYbnDU9V3Y2qd1jZoXzmBZ6grr1ikqRJoISoD8hxKWJlxITw9_0Ze6tZUfxKt1SMGAenXcKWNr5yxmamGLubYrRYlaL0L9XITnrOPLosTVn1YN-_cXQBO5jhJ1VYVr8OO7SttX5YNKUI-3fTV5ksOb8WCsBPsEg8CWWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1648606351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Leinonen, J. ; Moisseev, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, J. ; Moisseev, D.</creatorcontrib><description>A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms. Key Points The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; aggregation ; backscattering ; Constituents ; Crystals ; DDA ; Geophysics ; Ice ; Ice crystals ; Mathematical models ; multifrequency ; Radar ; Retrieval ; Satellite communications ; Signatures ; Snow ; Snowflakes</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2015-01, Vol.120 (1), p.229-239</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6560-6316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moisseev, D.</creatorcontrib><title>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><description>A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms. Key Points The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>aggregation</subject><subject>backscattering</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>DDA</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice crystals</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>multifrequency</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><subject>Satellite communications</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snowflakes</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UFLwzAUB_AiCop68wMUvHiwmjR5SXsSmbo5hw6Z6C1k2Wutdu1MWue-vRkVEQ9iLgnk9x7_xwuCA0pOKCHxaUwoH16QOCYy3gh2YirSKElTsfn9lk_bwb5zL8SfhDAOfCcYPT7rJpzVYWOLRYlRZvGtxcqsQqtn2oauyCvdtBZdaPEddRnqad02oc5zi7luMHRVvcxK_YrubC_YynTpcP_r3g0eri4nvUE0uutf985HkQEuZWSQZ4AGKRhtAHgiCKUpipmGaQw808IAYzwl4D8ZTQmPGTPZFKQQyAHYbnDU9V3Y2qd1jZoXzmBZ6grr1ikqRJoISoD8hxKWJlxITw9_0Ze6tZUfxKt1SMGAenXcKWNr5yxmamGLubYrRYlaL0L9XITnrOPLosTVn1YN-_cXQBO5jhJ1VYVr8OO7SttX5YNKUI-3fTV5ksOb8WCsBPsEg8CWWA</recordid><startdate>20150116</startdate><enddate>20150116</enddate><creator>Leinonen, J.</creator><creator>Moisseev, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-6316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150116</creationdate><title>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</title><author>Leinonen, J. ; Moisseev, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>aggregation</topic><topic>backscattering</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>DDA</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice crystals</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>multifrequency</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><topic>Satellite communications</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snowflakes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moisseev, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leinonen, J.</au><au>Moisseev, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><date>2015-01-16</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>229-239</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms. Key Points The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2014JD022072</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-6316</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2015-01, Vol.120 (1), p.229-239
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669861050
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aggregates
aggregation
backscattering
Constituents
Crystals
DDA
Geophysics
Ice
Ice crystals
Mathematical models
multifrequency
Radar
Retrieval
Satellite communications
Signatures
Snow
Snowflakes
title What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A22%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20do%20triple-frequency%20radar%20signatures%20reveal%20about%20aggregate%20snowflakes?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Leinonen,%20J.&rft.date=2015-01-16&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=229-239&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2014JD022072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660398467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1648606351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true