Loading…
What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?
A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constitu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2015-01, Vol.120 (1), p.229-239 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553 |
container_end_page | 239 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Leinonen, J. Moisseev, D. |
description | A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms.
Key Points
The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied
The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate
The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2014JD022072 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669861050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660398467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFLwzAUB_AiCop68wMUvHiwmjR5SXsSmbo5hw6Z6C1k2Wutdu1MWue-vRkVEQ9iLgnk9x7_xwuCA0pOKCHxaUwoH16QOCYy3gh2YirSKElTsfn9lk_bwb5zL8SfhDAOfCcYPT7rJpzVYWOLRYlRZvGtxcqsQqtn2oauyCvdtBZdaPEddRnqad02oc5zi7luMHRVvcxK_YrubC_YynTpcP_r3g0eri4nvUE0uutf985HkQEuZWSQZ4AGKRhtAHgiCKUpipmGaQw808IAYzwl4D8ZTQmPGTPZFKQQyAHYbnDU9V3Y2qd1jZoXzmBZ6grr1ikqRJoISoD8hxKWJlxITw9_0Ze6tZUfxKt1SMGAenXcKWNr5yxmamGLubYrRYlaL0L9XITnrOPLosTVn1YN-_cXQBO5jhJ1VYVr8OO7SttX5YNKUI-3fTV5ksOb8WCsBPsEg8CWWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1648606351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Leinonen, J. ; Moisseev, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, J. ; Moisseev, D.</creatorcontrib><description>A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms.
Key Points
The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied
The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate
The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; aggregation ; backscattering ; Constituents ; Crystals ; DDA ; Geophysics ; Ice ; Ice crystals ; Mathematical models ; multifrequency ; Radar ; Retrieval ; Satellite communications ; Signatures ; Snow ; Snowflakes</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2015-01, Vol.120 (1), p.229-239</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6560-6316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moisseev, D.</creatorcontrib><title>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><description>A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms.
Key Points
The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied
The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate
The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>aggregation</subject><subject>backscattering</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>DDA</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice crystals</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>multifrequency</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><subject>Satellite communications</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snowflakes</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UFLwzAUB_AiCop68wMUvHiwmjR5SXsSmbo5hw6Z6C1k2Wutdu1MWue-vRkVEQ9iLgnk9x7_xwuCA0pOKCHxaUwoH16QOCYy3gh2YirSKElTsfn9lk_bwb5zL8SfhDAOfCcYPT7rJpzVYWOLRYlRZvGtxcqsQqtn2oauyCvdtBZdaPEddRnqad02oc5zi7luMHRVvcxK_YrubC_YynTpcP_r3g0eri4nvUE0uutf985HkQEuZWSQZ4AGKRhtAHgiCKUpipmGaQw808IAYzwl4D8ZTQmPGTPZFKQQyAHYbnDU9V3Y2qd1jZoXzmBZ6grr1ikqRJoISoD8hxKWJlxITw9_0Ze6tZUfxKt1SMGAenXcKWNr5yxmamGLubYrRYlaL0L9XITnrOPLosTVn1YN-_cXQBO5jhJ1VYVr8OO7SttX5YNKUI-3fTV5ksOb8WCsBPsEg8CWWA</recordid><startdate>20150116</startdate><enddate>20150116</enddate><creator>Leinonen, J.</creator><creator>Moisseev, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-6316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150116</creationdate><title>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</title><author>Leinonen, J. ; Moisseev, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>aggregation</topic><topic>backscattering</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>DDA</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice crystals</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>multifrequency</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><topic>Satellite communications</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snowflakes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moisseev, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leinonen, J.</au><au>Moisseev, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><date>2015-01-16</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>229-239</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>A large data set of volume element models of aggregate snowflakes was created, building the snowflakes from various models of ice crystals found in the atmosphere: dendrites, needles, plates, and bullet rosettes, as well as spheroidal crystals for comparison. Several different sizes for the constituent crystals were also used. The radar backscattering cross sections of the snowflakes were computed from the models using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) at 13.6 GHz (Ku band), 35.6 GHz (Ka band) and 94.0 GHz (W band), and the effects of the choice of crystal model and size on the Ku/Ka band and Ka/W band dual‐wavelength ratios (DWR) was investigated. It was found that the aggregate DWRs were very similar for all naturally occurring ice crystal types investigated in this study. This implies that the choice of crystal type is at most of secondary importance in the forward model of scattering used for snowfall retrievals but also, conversely, that the identification of the crystal type from triple‐frequency observations is likely to be difficult. In contrast, the size of the constituent ice crystals does have a nonnegligible impact on the triple‐frequency signatures. Additionally, it was found that the triple‐frequency signatures found in some experimental data, resembling those resulting from spheroidal model snowflakes, cannot be reproduced using the aggregates with any of the crystal types that were investigated. This suggests that besides aggregation, other mechanisms of snowflake formation from ice crystals must be considered in snowfall retrieval algorithms.
Key Points
The triple‐frequency radar signature of aggregate snowflakes was studied
The signature is not sensitive to the type of ice crystals in the aggregate
The size of the constituent crystals does have a measurable effect</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2014JD022072</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-6316</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2015-01, Vol.120 (1), p.229-239 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669861050 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aggregates aggregation backscattering Constituents Crystals DDA Geophysics Ice Ice crystals Mathematical models multifrequency Radar Retrieval Satellite communications Signatures Snow Snowflakes |
title | What do triple-frequency radar signatures reveal about aggregate snowflakes? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A22%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20do%20triple-frequency%20radar%20signatures%20reveal%20about%20aggregate%20snowflakes?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Leinonen,%20J.&rft.date=2015-01-16&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=229-239&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2014JD022072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1660398467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5477-ce4f5ece15cac554860119e6da5b254fa6c533490555431904233cfb5766e4553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1648606351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |