Loading…

User self-governance in a complex policy design for managing water commons in Japan

•Complex policy design involves state, privatization and user self-governance.•Nonparticipatory state provides financial, technological, and statutory assistance.•Nonparticipatory state provides users with autonomy to self-govern their commons.•Complex policy design strengthens users’ self-governing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2014-03, Vol.510, p.246-258
Main Authors: Sarker, Ashutosh, Itoh, Tadao, Kada, Ryohei, Abe, Takaki, Nakashima, Masahiro, Herath, Gamini
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3
container_end_page 258
container_issue
container_start_page 246
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 510
creator Sarker, Ashutosh
Itoh, Tadao
Kada, Ryohei
Abe, Takaki
Nakashima, Masahiro
Herath, Gamini
description •Complex policy design involves state, privatization and user self-governance.•Nonparticipatory state provides financial, technological, and statutory assistance.•Nonparticipatory state provides users with autonomy to self-govern their commons.•Complex policy design strengthens users’ self-governing institutional arrangements. Studies have typically emphasized one of three major policy alternatives—government (state) ownership, privatization, or user self-governance—to address overuse of “the commons” as a natural resource shared by many competing users. Studies tend to focus on each alternative separately. Government ownership or privatization is usually understood to undermine user self-governing institutional arrangements, while user self-governance has proved to be a very powerful policy alternative in managing the commons in many cases. An important research question arises as to whether a complex policy design can strengthen the competence of user self-governing institutional arrangements. This article defines a complex policy design as one that involves a mix of flexible policy alternatives rather than a rigid alternative to address overuse issues. Drawing on Japan’s irrigation water management experience, this study demonstrates that when a complex policy design is tailored to facilitate user autonomy, it further strengthens user self-governance. The study provides scholars with insight into how self-governing institutional arrangements—which were primarily developed in the existing literature with the government’s role assumed as absent or implicit—could be enhanced when the role is strategically explicit.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.034
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669874014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169413009311</els_id><sourcerecordid>1669874014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQQEVJoU7an1DQpZDLbvW10upUQkg_QqCHNmchSyNXZlfaSE5a__vK2OSazGUu783AQ-gjJT0lVH7e9ts_e1_y1DNCeU9ZT7h4g1Z0VLpjiqgztCKEsY5KLd6h81q3pA3nYoV-3VcouMIUuk1-gpJscoBjwha7PC8T_MNLnqLbYw81bhIOueDZJruJaYP_2l2zGzjnVA_WrV1seo_eBjtV-HDaF-j-683v6-_d3c9vP66v7jor2Ljr3LgG6r2mzhPG1UAlcGalcz64IQyjZsx5R9ygFNGjDkIzAUKt10EFuZaOX6DL492l5IdHqDszx-pgmmyC_FgNlVKPShAqXoMKqjWTB3Q4oq7kWgsEs5Q427I3lJhDb7M1p97m0NtQZlrv5n06vbDV2SmUVjLWZ5mNnFPKeOO-HDloaZ4iFFNdhFbdxwJuZ3yOL3z6D4p0mPY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664199264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>User self-governance in a complex policy design for managing water commons in Japan</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Sarker, Ashutosh ; Itoh, Tadao ; Kada, Ryohei ; Abe, Takaki ; Nakashima, Masahiro ; Herath, Gamini</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Ashutosh ; Itoh, Tadao ; Kada, Ryohei ; Abe, Takaki ; Nakashima, Masahiro ; Herath, Gamini</creatorcontrib><description>•Complex policy design involves state, privatization and user self-governance.•Nonparticipatory state provides financial, technological, and statutory assistance.•Nonparticipatory state provides users with autonomy to self-govern their commons.•Complex policy design strengthens users’ self-governing institutional arrangements. Studies have typically emphasized one of three major policy alternatives—government (state) ownership, privatization, or user self-governance—to address overuse of “the commons” as a natural resource shared by many competing users. Studies tend to focus on each alternative separately. Government ownership or privatization is usually understood to undermine user self-governing institutional arrangements, while user self-governance has proved to be a very powerful policy alternative in managing the commons in many cases. An important research question arises as to whether a complex policy design can strengthen the competence of user self-governing institutional arrangements. This article defines a complex policy design as one that involves a mix of flexible policy alternatives rather than a rigid alternative to address overuse issues. Drawing on Japan’s irrigation water management experience, this study demonstrates that when a complex policy design is tailored to facilitate user autonomy, it further strengthens user self-governance. The study provides scholars with insight into how self-governing institutional arrangements—which were primarily developed in the existing literature with the government’s role assumed as absent or implicit—could be enhanced when the role is strategically explicit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.034</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Complex policy design ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Governments ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Irrigation ; Irrigation institutions ; Japan ; Natural resources ; Ownership ; Policies ; Polycentricity ; Privatization ; Self-governance ; User autonomy ; Water management ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014-03, Vol.510, p.246-258</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28331123$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Ashutosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itoh, Tadao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kada, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Takaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herath, Gamini</creatorcontrib><title>User self-governance in a complex policy design for managing water commons in Japan</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•Complex policy design involves state, privatization and user self-governance.•Nonparticipatory state provides financial, technological, and statutory assistance.•Nonparticipatory state provides users with autonomy to self-govern their commons.•Complex policy design strengthens users’ self-governing institutional arrangements. Studies have typically emphasized one of three major policy alternatives—government (state) ownership, privatization, or user self-governance—to address overuse of “the commons” as a natural resource shared by many competing users. Studies tend to focus on each alternative separately. Government ownership or privatization is usually understood to undermine user self-governing institutional arrangements, while user self-governance has proved to be a very powerful policy alternative in managing the commons in many cases. An important research question arises as to whether a complex policy design can strengthen the competence of user self-governing institutional arrangements. This article defines a complex policy design as one that involves a mix of flexible policy alternatives rather than a rigid alternative to address overuse issues. Drawing on Japan’s irrigation water management experience, this study demonstrates that when a complex policy design is tailored to facilitate user autonomy, it further strengthens user self-governance. The study provides scholars with insight into how self-governing institutional arrangements—which were primarily developed in the existing literature with the government’s role assumed as absent or implicit—could be enhanced when the role is strategically explicit.</description><subject>Complex policy design</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation institutions</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Polycentricity</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Self-governance</subject><subject>User autonomy</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQQEVJoU7an1DQpZDLbvW10upUQkg_QqCHNmchSyNXZlfaSE5a__vK2OSazGUu783AQ-gjJT0lVH7e9ts_e1_y1DNCeU9ZT7h4g1Z0VLpjiqgztCKEsY5KLd6h81q3pA3nYoV-3VcouMIUuk1-gpJscoBjwha7PC8T_MNLnqLbYw81bhIOueDZJruJaYP_2l2zGzjnVA_WrV1seo_eBjtV-HDaF-j-683v6-_d3c9vP66v7jor2Ljr3LgG6r2mzhPG1UAlcGalcz64IQyjZsx5R9ygFNGjDkIzAUKt10EFuZaOX6DL492l5IdHqDszx-pgmmyC_FgNlVKPShAqXoMKqjWTB3Q4oq7kWgsEs5Q427I3lJhDb7M1p97m0NtQZlrv5n06vbDV2SmUVjLWZ5mNnFPKeOO-HDloaZ4iFFNdhFbdxwJuZ3yOL3z6D4p0mPY</recordid><startdate>20140314</startdate><enddate>20140314</enddate><creator>Sarker, Ashutosh</creator><creator>Itoh, Tadao</creator><creator>Kada, Ryohei</creator><creator>Abe, Takaki</creator><creator>Nakashima, Masahiro</creator><creator>Herath, Gamini</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140314</creationdate><title>User self-governance in a complex policy design for managing water commons in Japan</title><author>Sarker, Ashutosh ; Itoh, Tadao ; Kada, Ryohei ; Abe, Takaki ; Nakashima, Masahiro ; Herath, Gamini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Complex policy design</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation institutions</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Polycentricity</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Self-governance</topic><topic>User autonomy</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarker, Ashutosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itoh, Tadao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kada, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Takaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herath, Gamini</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarker, Ashutosh</au><au>Itoh, Tadao</au><au>Kada, Ryohei</au><au>Abe, Takaki</au><au>Nakashima, Masahiro</au><au>Herath, Gamini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>User self-governance in a complex policy design for managing water commons in Japan</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2014-03-14</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>510</volume><spage>246</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>246-258</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>•Complex policy design involves state, privatization and user self-governance.•Nonparticipatory state provides financial, technological, and statutory assistance.•Nonparticipatory state provides users with autonomy to self-govern their commons.•Complex policy design strengthens users’ self-governing institutional arrangements. Studies have typically emphasized one of three major policy alternatives—government (state) ownership, privatization, or user self-governance—to address overuse of “the commons” as a natural resource shared by many competing users. Studies tend to focus on each alternative separately. Government ownership or privatization is usually understood to undermine user self-governing institutional arrangements, while user self-governance has proved to be a very powerful policy alternative in managing the commons in many cases. An important research question arises as to whether a complex policy design can strengthen the competence of user self-governing institutional arrangements. This article defines a complex policy design as one that involves a mix of flexible policy alternatives rather than a rigid alternative to address overuse issues. Drawing on Japan’s irrigation water management experience, this study demonstrates that when a complex policy design is tailored to facilitate user autonomy, it further strengthens user self-governance. The study provides scholars with insight into how self-governing institutional arrangements—which were primarily developed in the existing literature with the government’s role assumed as absent or implicit—could be enhanced when the role is strategically explicit.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.034</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014-03, Vol.510, p.246-258
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669874014
source Elsevier
subjects Complex policy design
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Governments
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Irrigation
Irrigation institutions
Japan
Natural resources
Ownership
Policies
Polycentricity
Privatization
Self-governance
User autonomy
Water management
Water resources
title User self-governance in a complex policy design for managing water commons in Japan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A58%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=User%20self-governance%20in%20a%20complex%20policy%20design%20for%20managing%20water%20commons%20in%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Sarker,%20Ashutosh&rft.date=2014-03-14&rft.volume=510&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=246-258&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669874014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-c8be1dd91cd0237516e32a6ccdfc5f58922cdc0c5770989f4924e47bbf7f6b6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664199264&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true