Loading…
Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series
•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed serie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2014-03, Vol.510, p.293-298 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273 |
container_end_page | 298 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 510 |
creator | Sang, Yan-Fang Wang, Zhonggen Liu, Changming |
description | •Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend.
Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669874280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169413009360</els_id><sourcerecordid>1664198823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rXCEUhiW0kGnanxBwU8jm3urRuVdXJUzSD5rQTbss4ugx43DvdaqmkH9fwwzdpm6E4_P6Hh5CLjnrOePDh32_3z35nKYeGBc9h54JfUZWXI26g5GNr8iKMYCOD1qekzel7Fk7QsgV-bVJ88HmWNJCU6B1h_T-G61YKrWLp7f3N3TGukuehpRpzdiG0eNSY4jO1thicaHH-vTQRhOtcUZaMEcsb8nrYKeC7073Bfn56fbH5kt39_3z1831XWclqNrhKLkD0CoADsCUDXy7VV6ik6NAyTS0160Ow1r7YBEgcMEZ6K1eey1hFBfk6vjvIaffj215M8ficJrsgumxGD4MWo2ti_0PKrlWCkRD10fU5VRKxmAOOc42PxnOzLN5szcn8-bZvOFgmvmWe3-qsKUJCdkuLpZ_YVBCcA5D4z4eOWxq_kTMpriIi0MfM7pqfIovNP0FzTubbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664198823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Sang, Yan-Fang ; Wang, Zhonggen ; Liu, Changming</creator><creatorcontrib>Sang, Yan-Fang ; Wang, Zhonggen ; Liu, Changming</creatorcontrib><description>•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend.
Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Correlation ; Decomposition ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Empirical analysis ; Empirical mode decomposition ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrological time series analysis ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Mann–Kendall test ; Nonlinearity ; Statistical significance ; Tasks ; Time series ; Time series analysis ; Trend identification ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014-03, Vol.510, p.293-298</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28331126$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sang, Yan-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhonggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Changming</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend.
Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.</description><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empirical mode decomposition</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrological time series analysis</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mann–Kendall test</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><subject>Trend identification</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rXCEUhiW0kGnanxBwU8jm3urRuVdXJUzSD5rQTbss4ugx43DvdaqmkH9fwwzdpm6E4_P6Hh5CLjnrOePDh32_3z35nKYeGBc9h54JfUZWXI26g5GNr8iKMYCOD1qekzel7Fk7QsgV-bVJ88HmWNJCU6B1h_T-G61YKrWLp7f3N3TGukuehpRpzdiG0eNSY4jO1thicaHH-vTQRhOtcUZaMEcsb8nrYKeC7073Bfn56fbH5kt39_3z1831XWclqNrhKLkD0CoADsCUDXy7VV6ik6NAyTS0160Ow1r7YBEgcMEZ6K1eey1hFBfk6vjvIaffj215M8ficJrsgumxGD4MWo2ti_0PKrlWCkRD10fU5VRKxmAOOc42PxnOzLN5szcn8-bZvOFgmvmWe3-qsKUJCdkuLpZ_YVBCcA5D4z4eOWxq_kTMpriIi0MfM7pqfIovNP0FzTubbQ</recordid><startdate>20140314</startdate><enddate>20140314</enddate><creator>Sang, Yan-Fang</creator><creator>Wang, Zhonggen</creator><creator>Liu, Changming</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140314</creationdate><title>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</title><author>Sang, Yan-Fang ; Wang, Zhonggen ; Liu, Changming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empirical mode decomposition</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrological time series analysis</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mann–Kendall test</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><topic>Trend identification</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sang, Yan-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhonggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Changming</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sang, Yan-Fang</au><au>Wang, Zhonggen</au><au>Liu, Changming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2014-03-14</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>510</volume><spage>293</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>293-298</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend.
Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1694 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014-03, Vol.510, p.293-298 |
issn | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669874280 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Correlation Decomposition Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Empirical analysis Empirical mode decomposition Exact sciences and technology Hydrological time series analysis Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Mann–Kendall test Nonlinearity Statistical significance Tasks Time series Time series analysis Trend identification Trends |
title | Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A34%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20MK%20test%20and%20EMD%20method%20for%20trend%20identification%20in%20hydrological%20time%20series&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Sang,%20Yan-Fang&rft.date=2014-03-14&rft.volume=510&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=293-298&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664198823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664198823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |