Loading…

Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series

•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed serie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2014-03, Vol.510, p.293-298
Main Authors: Sang, Yan-Fang, Wang, Zhonggen, Liu, Changming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273
container_end_page 298
container_issue
container_start_page 293
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 510
creator Sang, Yan-Fang
Wang, Zhonggen
Liu, Changming
description •Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend. Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669874280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169413009360</els_id><sourcerecordid>1664198823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rXCEUhiW0kGnanxBwU8jm3urRuVdXJUzSD5rQTbss4ugx43DvdaqmkH9fwwzdpm6E4_P6Hh5CLjnrOePDh32_3z35nKYeGBc9h54JfUZWXI26g5GNr8iKMYCOD1qekzel7Fk7QsgV-bVJ88HmWNJCU6B1h_T-G61YKrWLp7f3N3TGukuehpRpzdiG0eNSY4jO1thicaHH-vTQRhOtcUZaMEcsb8nrYKeC7073Bfn56fbH5kt39_3z1831XWclqNrhKLkD0CoADsCUDXy7VV6ik6NAyTS0160Ow1r7YBEgcMEZ6K1eey1hFBfk6vjvIaffj215M8ficJrsgumxGD4MWo2ti_0PKrlWCkRD10fU5VRKxmAOOc42PxnOzLN5szcn8-bZvOFgmvmWe3-qsKUJCdkuLpZ_YVBCcA5D4z4eOWxq_kTMpriIi0MfM7pqfIovNP0FzTubbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1664198823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Sang, Yan-Fang ; Wang, Zhonggen ; Liu, Changming</creator><creatorcontrib>Sang, Yan-Fang ; Wang, Zhonggen ; Liu, Changming</creatorcontrib><description>•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend. Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Correlation ; Decomposition ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Empirical analysis ; Empirical mode decomposition ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrological time series analysis ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Mann–Kendall test ; Nonlinearity ; Statistical significance ; Tasks ; Time series ; Time series analysis ; Trend identification ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014-03, Vol.510, p.293-298</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28331126$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sang, Yan-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhonggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Changming</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend. Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.</description><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empirical mode decomposition</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrological time series analysis</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mann–Kendall test</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><subject>Trend identification</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rXCEUhiW0kGnanxBwU8jm3urRuVdXJUzSD5rQTbss4ugx43DvdaqmkH9fwwzdpm6E4_P6Hh5CLjnrOePDh32_3z35nKYeGBc9h54JfUZWXI26g5GNr8iKMYCOD1qekzel7Fk7QsgV-bVJ88HmWNJCU6B1h_T-G61YKrWLp7f3N3TGukuehpRpzdiG0eNSY4jO1thicaHH-vTQRhOtcUZaMEcsb8nrYKeC7073Bfn56fbH5kt39_3z1831XWclqNrhKLkD0CoADsCUDXy7VV6ik6NAyTS0160Ow1r7YBEgcMEZ6K1eey1hFBfk6vjvIaffj215M8ficJrsgumxGD4MWo2ti_0PKrlWCkRD10fU5VRKxmAOOc42PxnOzLN5szcn8-bZvOFgmvmWe3-qsKUJCdkuLpZ_YVBCcA5D4z4eOWxq_kTMpriIi0MfM7pqfIovNP0FzTubbQ</recordid><startdate>20140314</startdate><enddate>20140314</enddate><creator>Sang, Yan-Fang</creator><creator>Wang, Zhonggen</creator><creator>Liu, Changming</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140314</creationdate><title>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</title><author>Sang, Yan-Fang ; Wang, Zhonggen ; Liu, Changming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empirical mode decomposition</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrological time series analysis</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mann–Kendall test</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><topic>Trend identification</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sang, Yan-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhonggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Changming</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sang, Yan-Fang</au><au>Wang, Zhonggen</au><au>Liu, Changming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2014-03-14</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>510</volume><spage>293</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>293-298</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>•Pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test.•Series’ trend magnitudes greatly influence trend identification of series.•EMD method can be an effective alternative for trend identification of series.•EMD method can identify the specific shape of the analyzed series’ trend. Trend identification is an important issue in hydrological time series analysis, but it is also a difficult task due to the diverse performances of methods. This paper mainly investigated the performances between the Mann–Kendall (MK) test and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method for trend identification of series. Analyses of both synthetic and observed series indicate the better performance of EMD compared with the other. The results show that pre-whitening cannot really improve trend identification when using the MK test, but cause wrong results sometimes. It can be due to the good correlation of trend, so pre-whitening would weaken trend’s magnitude. If the trend of the analyzed series has small magnitude, it cannot be accurately identified by the MK test, because the trend would be submerged too severely by other components of series to accurately identify trend. When the analyzed series has short length, its trend cannot be accurately identified by the MK test. However, the EMD method can eliminate the influences of trends’ magnitude and series’ length, so it has more effective power for trend identification. As a result, it is suggested that series’ trend can be directly identified by the MK test but need not do pre-whitening; moreover, the influences of trends’ magnitude should be carefully considered for trend identification. Comparatively, the EMD method can adaptively determine the specific shape of the nonlinear and non-stationary trend of series by considering statistical significance, so it can be an effective alternative for trend identification of hydrological time series.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014-03, Vol.510, p.293-298
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1669874280
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Correlation
Decomposition
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Empirical analysis
Empirical mode decomposition
Exact sciences and technology
Hydrological time series analysis
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Mann–Kendall test
Nonlinearity
Statistical significance
Tasks
Time series
Time series analysis
Trend identification
Trends
title Comparison of the MK test and EMD method for trend identification in hydrological time series
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A34%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20MK%20test%20and%20EMD%20method%20for%20trend%20identification%20in%20hydrological%20time%20series&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Sang,%20Yan-Fang&rft.date=2014-03-14&rft.volume=510&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=293-298&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1664198823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-e741c2298f2e6208af1bb8d4ec473e4092c22b9f659dfae22f131029b95d94273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1664198823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true