Crustal origin of trench-parallel shear-wave fast polarizations in the Central Andes

• Published in: Earth and planetary science letters 2014-04, Vol.392, p.230-238
• Main Authors: Wolbern, I, Lobl, U, Ruempker, G
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anisotropy; Central Andes; Delay; FD modeling; Finite difference method; Fossils; Mathematical models; Origins; Phases; Polarization; seismic anisotropy; shear-wave splitting; Slabs; subduction zone
• ISSN: 0012-821X; 1385-013X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.032

In this study, SKS and local S phases are analyzed to investigate variations of shear-wave splitting parameters along two dense seismic profiles across the central Andean Altiplano and Puna plateaus. In contrast to previous observations, the vast majority of the measurements reveal fast polarizations sub-parallel to the subduction direction of the Nazca plate with delay times between 0.3 and 1.2 s. Local phases show larger variations of fast polarizations and exhibit delay times ranging between 0.1 and 1.1 s. Two 70 km and 100 km wide sections along the Altiplano profile exhibit larger delay times and are characterized by fast polarizations oriented sub-parallel to major fault zones. Based on finite-difference wavefield calculations for anisotropic subduction zone models we demonstrate that the observations are best explained by fossil slab anisotropy with fast symmetry axes oriented sub-parallel to the slab movement in combination with a significant component of crustal anisotropy of nearly trench-parallel fast-axis orientation. From the modeling we exclude a sub-lithospheric origin of the observed strong anomalies due to the short-scale variations of the fast polarizations. Instead, our results indicate that anisotropy in the Central Andes generally reflects the direction of plate motion while the observed trench-parallel fast polarizations likely originate in the continental crust above the subducting slab. •Trench-normal fast polarizations dominate shear-wave splitting in the Central Andes.•Fossil slab anisotropy best explains polarizations sub-parallel to the plate motion.•Crustal component of anisotropy is possibly induced by ductile flow in the lower crust.•Lateral variations are mainly due to crustal influences in connection to fault systems.•Full-waveform modeling allows to discriminate between effects from different zones of anisotropy.