Loading…
Comparison of visual and automated assessment of HER2 status and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer
Mohammed Z M A, Going J J, McMillan D C, Orange C, Mallon E, Doughty J C & Edwards J (2012) Histopathology 61, 675–684 Comparison of visual and automated assessment of HER2 status and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer Aims: To compare visual and computer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Histopathology 2012-10, Vol.61 (4), p.675-684 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Mohammed Z M A, Going J J, McMillan D C, Orange C, Mallon E, Doughty J C & Edwards J
(2012) Histopathology 61, 675–684
Comparison of visual and automated assessment of HER2 status and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer
Aims: To compare visual and computerized image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) with fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 status, and to examine the relationships with outcome in patients with primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer.
Methods and results: Tissue microarrays for 431 breast cancer patients were used to compare different approaches to the assessment of HER2 status. The cores were scored visually and with the Slidepath Tissue IA system, using the NICE‐approved scoring system for the HercepTest, as well as by FISH. The agreement between visual and image analysis of HER2 IHC was excellent [interclass correlation coefficient (ICCC) = 0.95, rs = 0.90, r = 0.91, k = 0.81, and P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0309-0167 1365-2559 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04280.x |