Loading…

Cross layer load balanced forwarding schemes for video sensor networks

In this paper, we propose two cross layer geographic forwarding schemes which address congestion in wireless video sensor networks (VSN) to provide reliable video delivery. The first scheme Load Balanced Reliable Forwarding (LBRF) introduces the notion of local load balancing where a sensor dynamica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ad hoc networks 2011-05, Vol.9 (3), p.265-284
Main Authors: Isik, Sinan, Donmez, Mehmet Yunus, Ersoy, Cem
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3
container_end_page 284
container_issue 3
container_start_page 265
container_title Ad hoc networks
container_volume 9
creator Isik, Sinan
Donmez, Mehmet Yunus
Ersoy, Cem
description In this paper, we propose two cross layer geographic forwarding schemes which address congestion in wireless video sensor networks (VSN) to provide reliable video delivery. The first scheme Load Balanced Reliable Forwarding (LBRF) introduces the notion of local load balancing where a sensor dynamically determines the next hop among the alternative neighbors providing positive advancement towards the sink by considering the balance of their buffer occupancy levels at the time of delivery. LBRF utilizes a modified version of SMAC where the packet structure as well as the operation of SMAC is modified for the accurate monitoring of the buffer occupancy conditions of the neighbors. The second scheme Directional Load Balanced Spreading (DLBS) combines local and direction-based (spatial) load balancing approaches to provide more reliable and faster video delivery by benefiting from the advantages of both approaches. The performance of the forwarding schemes are compared using simulation with two geographic routing schemes where one applies no load balancing and the other applies spatial load balancing. The results show that both LBRF and DLBS provide more reliable video delivery as compared to other schemes, whereas DLBS is more reliable and faster as compared to LBRF. In addition, DLBS provides more energy efficient video delivery in terms of energy expenditure per successfully delivered frame to the sink as compared to LBRF and the other two schemes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.adhoc.2010.07.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671287549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1570870510000818</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671287549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC1g8siTY-XIyMKCKFqRKLN2ts32hLmlc7LRV_z0ORYxMPp-e93T3EHLPWcoZrx43KZi102nGYoeJlLHsgkx4KVhSC55f_tWsvCY3IWwi0ER4QuYz70KgHZzQ086BoQo66DUa2jp_BG9s_0GDXuMWw9iiB2vQ0YB9iJ8eh6Pzn-GWXLXQBbz7fadkNX9ZzV6T5fvibfa8THSeV0MieCFEYbgBVVVNw8G0qsiAicwUqmFCm9aUWoHGjENZQ-SMUAxrBaJGnU_Jw3nszruvPYZBbm3Q2MWN0e2D5JXgWS3Koolofkb1eKDHVu683YI_Sc7kKE1u5I80OUqTTMjoJKaezimMRxwsehm0xVGH9agHaZz9N_8NSmB38Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671287549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross layer load balanced forwarding schemes for video sensor networks</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Isik, Sinan ; Donmez, Mehmet Yunus ; Ersoy, Cem</creator><creatorcontrib>Isik, Sinan ; Donmez, Mehmet Yunus ; Ersoy, Cem</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we propose two cross layer geographic forwarding schemes which address congestion in wireless video sensor networks (VSN) to provide reliable video delivery. The first scheme Load Balanced Reliable Forwarding (LBRF) introduces the notion of local load balancing where a sensor dynamically determines the next hop among the alternative neighbors providing positive advancement towards the sink by considering the balance of their buffer occupancy levels at the time of delivery. LBRF utilizes a modified version of SMAC where the packet structure as well as the operation of SMAC is modified for the accurate monitoring of the buffer occupancy conditions of the neighbors. The second scheme Directional Load Balanced Spreading (DLBS) combines local and direction-based (spatial) load balancing approaches to provide more reliable and faster video delivery by benefiting from the advantages of both approaches. The performance of the forwarding schemes are compared using simulation with two geographic routing schemes where one applies no load balancing and the other applies spatial load balancing. The results show that both LBRF and DLBS provide more reliable video delivery as compared to other schemes, whereas DLBS is more reliable and faster as compared to LBRF. In addition, DLBS provides more energy efficient video delivery in terms of energy expenditure per successfully delivered frame to the sink as compared to LBRF and the other two schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-8705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-8713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2010.07.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Balancing ; Congestion avoidance ; Cross layer ; Geographic routing ; Load-balancing ; Networks ; Sensors ; Video sensor networks</subject><ispartof>Ad hoc networks, 2011-05, Vol.9 (3), p.265-284</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isik, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Mehmet Yunus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Cem</creatorcontrib><title>Cross layer load balanced forwarding schemes for video sensor networks</title><title>Ad hoc networks</title><description>In this paper, we propose two cross layer geographic forwarding schemes which address congestion in wireless video sensor networks (VSN) to provide reliable video delivery. The first scheme Load Balanced Reliable Forwarding (LBRF) introduces the notion of local load balancing where a sensor dynamically determines the next hop among the alternative neighbors providing positive advancement towards the sink by considering the balance of their buffer occupancy levels at the time of delivery. LBRF utilizes a modified version of SMAC where the packet structure as well as the operation of SMAC is modified for the accurate monitoring of the buffer occupancy conditions of the neighbors. The second scheme Directional Load Balanced Spreading (DLBS) combines local and direction-based (spatial) load balancing approaches to provide more reliable and faster video delivery by benefiting from the advantages of both approaches. The performance of the forwarding schemes are compared using simulation with two geographic routing schemes where one applies no load balancing and the other applies spatial load balancing. The results show that both LBRF and DLBS provide more reliable video delivery as compared to other schemes, whereas DLBS is more reliable and faster as compared to LBRF. In addition, DLBS provides more energy efficient video delivery in terms of energy expenditure per successfully delivered frame to the sink as compared to LBRF and the other two schemes.</description><subject>Balancing</subject><subject>Congestion avoidance</subject><subject>Cross layer</subject><subject>Geographic routing</subject><subject>Load-balancing</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Video sensor networks</subject><issn>1570-8705</issn><issn>1570-8713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC1g8siTY-XIyMKCKFqRKLN2ts32hLmlc7LRV_z0ORYxMPp-e93T3EHLPWcoZrx43KZi102nGYoeJlLHsgkx4KVhSC55f_tWsvCY3IWwi0ER4QuYz70KgHZzQ086BoQo66DUa2jp_BG9s_0GDXuMWw9iiB2vQ0YB9iJ8eh6Pzn-GWXLXQBbz7fadkNX9ZzV6T5fvibfa8THSeV0MieCFEYbgBVVVNw8G0qsiAicwUqmFCm9aUWoHGjENZQ-SMUAxrBaJGnU_Jw3nszruvPYZBbm3Q2MWN0e2D5JXgWS3Koolofkb1eKDHVu683YI_Sc7kKE1u5I80OUqTTMjoJKaezimMRxwsehm0xVGH9agHaZz9N_8NSmB38Q</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Isik, Sinan</creator><creator>Donmez, Mehmet Yunus</creator><creator>Ersoy, Cem</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Cross layer load balanced forwarding schemes for video sensor networks</title><author>Isik, Sinan ; Donmez, Mehmet Yunus ; Ersoy, Cem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Balancing</topic><topic>Congestion avoidance</topic><topic>Cross layer</topic><topic>Geographic routing</topic><topic>Load-balancing</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Video sensor networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isik, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Mehmet Yunus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Cem</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Ad hoc networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isik, Sinan</au><au>Donmez, Mehmet Yunus</au><au>Ersoy, Cem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross layer load balanced forwarding schemes for video sensor networks</atitle><jtitle>Ad hoc networks</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>265-284</pages><issn>1570-8705</issn><eissn>1570-8713</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we propose two cross layer geographic forwarding schemes which address congestion in wireless video sensor networks (VSN) to provide reliable video delivery. The first scheme Load Balanced Reliable Forwarding (LBRF) introduces the notion of local load balancing where a sensor dynamically determines the next hop among the alternative neighbors providing positive advancement towards the sink by considering the balance of their buffer occupancy levels at the time of delivery. LBRF utilizes a modified version of SMAC where the packet structure as well as the operation of SMAC is modified for the accurate monitoring of the buffer occupancy conditions of the neighbors. The second scheme Directional Load Balanced Spreading (DLBS) combines local and direction-based (spatial) load balancing approaches to provide more reliable and faster video delivery by benefiting from the advantages of both approaches. The performance of the forwarding schemes are compared using simulation with two geographic routing schemes where one applies no load balancing and the other applies spatial load balancing. The results show that both LBRF and DLBS provide more reliable video delivery as compared to other schemes, whereas DLBS is more reliable and faster as compared to LBRF. In addition, DLBS provides more energy efficient video delivery in terms of energy expenditure per successfully delivered frame to the sink as compared to LBRF and the other two schemes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.adhoc.2010.07.002</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-8705
ispartof Ad hoc networks, 2011-05, Vol.9 (3), p.265-284
issn 1570-8705
1570-8713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671287549
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Balancing
Congestion avoidance
Cross layer
Geographic routing
Load-balancing
Networks
Sensors
Video sensor networks
title Cross layer load balanced forwarding schemes for video sensor networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%20layer%20load%20balanced%20forwarding%20schemes%20for%20video%20sensor%20networks&rft.jtitle=Ad%20hoc%20networks&rft.au=Isik,%20Sinan&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=265-284&rft.issn=1570-8705&rft.eissn=1570-8713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.adhoc.2010.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671287549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-714774d1dab66991adfb42a072d4b907cdfd5cbace21a58adabd7b0e8ba78ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671287549&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true