Pensions for 'Cultivators of Science'

• Published in: Annals of science 2010-10, Vol.67 (4), p.527-559
• Main Author: Crosland, Maurice
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ambiguity; Attitudes; Awards; Britain; British; Federal funding; General points; Governments; Historians; History of medicine and histology; History of science and technology; History of social organization of science and scientific research; History, 19th Century; Humans; Men; Pensions; Pensions - history; Savants; Science; Science - economics; Science - history; Sciences; Societies, Scientific - history; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 0003-3790; 1464-505X
• DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2010.486006

The occasional (and belated) concern of the British Government with science in the nineteenth century is a matter of potential interest to historians of science, yet many previous studies have tended to range over a variety of different aspects of the question. There have been too many vague allusions to financial support as 'money for science' in general. It is time that particular parts of the problem were unpacked. For example, the award of money (from the 1820s) to pay a few people of independent means for apparatus was quite distinct from the provision (from the 1830s) of an occasional pension. Even then, to speak of 'pensions' uncovers unfortunate ambiguities. For too long science in Britain was regarded as no more than a private hobby for the well-to-do. As late as 1856 an official government statement seemed to make this attitude official. The English attitude to pensions differed remarkably from the French, who established a precedent in the reward of savants, sometimes quoted enviously by British men of science. In 1837 Robert Peel virtually admitted that, in awarding pensions to 'cultivators of science', he was following the French practice. It may also be useful to emphasise the contrast between the English (often led by Cambridge professors) and the Scots, mostly from Edinburgh, mainly represented here by Whewell and Brewster, respectively. Babbage had a different role in this story from that usually told. A large part in supporting men of science of modest means could have been played by the British Association for the Advancement of Science but it consistently refused to do so, although it supported an elite among its own members.