Loading…
Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college
► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technolog...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers in human behavior 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.583-590 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3 |
container_end_page | 590 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 583 |
container_title | Computers in human behavior |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Huffman, William H. Huffman, Ann Hergatt |
description | ► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).
Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students (
N
=
384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671375878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563211002482</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671375878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxcPiwo6zfoC95SJ46THpdCfdelJZ_4DgZTyHdFKZyWzsaKpbmG-_kRGPwoO6_N6rqkfIH85WnHF5vlvZ7bCqGeerIsaaH2TBOyUqJfv6iCyYalTVSlH_IseIO8ZY2zK5IHfXsE-jo4PBYClOs9tT_BdixAu63gKdEWjydAK7HVNMmz31KVOcrQVEGkZqU4ywgd_kpzcR4eRzLsnz7d_1zX31-HT3cHP1WFkh2VT5uq17MwzctaxR5bbeqFaYFnjHnFR1D75vBiEHwZkTwqve9X4A6YBBJ5UVS3J2yH3N6W0GnPRLQAsxmhHSjJpLxYVqO9UVlB9QmxNiBq9fc3gxea850x-l6Z0upemP0nRRKa14Tj_jDVoTfTajDfhlrGUJb_q6cJcHDsqv7wGyRhtgtOBCBjtpl8I3W_4DMAaAfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671375878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Huffman, William H. ; Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creator><creatorcontrib>Huffman, William H. ; Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creatorcontrib><description>► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).
Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students (
N
=
384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHBEEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance tests ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colleges ; Computer anxiety ; Computer simulation ; Computer support ; Computer use ; Education ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human behavior ; Intentions to use technology ; Mathematical models ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure ; Students ; Technology utilization</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.583-590</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26137492$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huffman, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).
Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students (
N
=
384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).</description><subject>Acceptance tests</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Computer anxiety</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computer support</subject><subject>Computer use</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Intentions to use technology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxcPiwo6zfoC95SJ46THpdCfdelJZ_4DgZTyHdFKZyWzsaKpbmG-_kRGPwoO6_N6rqkfIH85WnHF5vlvZ7bCqGeerIsaaH2TBOyUqJfv6iCyYalTVSlH_IseIO8ZY2zK5IHfXsE-jo4PBYClOs9tT_BdixAu63gKdEWjydAK7HVNMmz31KVOcrQVEGkZqU4ywgd_kpzcR4eRzLsnz7d_1zX31-HT3cHP1WFkh2VT5uq17MwzctaxR5bbeqFaYFnjHnFR1D75vBiEHwZkTwqve9X4A6YBBJ5UVS3J2yH3N6W0GnPRLQAsxmhHSjJpLxYVqO9UVlB9QmxNiBq9fc3gxea850x-l6Z0upemP0nRRKa14Tj_jDVoTfTajDfhlrGUJb_q6cJcHDsqv7wGyRhtgtOBCBjtpl8I3W_4DMAaAfg</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Huffman, William H.</creator><creator>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</title><author>Huffman, William H. ; Huffman, Ann Hergatt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acceptance tests</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Computer anxiety</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computer support</topic><topic>Computer use</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Intentions to use technology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huffman, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huffman, William H.</au><au>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>583-590</pages><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><coden>CHBEEQ</coden><abstract>► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).
Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students (
N
=
384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0747-5632 |
ispartof | Computers in human behavior, 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.583-590 |
issn | 0747-5632 1873-7692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671375878 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Acceptance tests Biological and medical sciences Colleges Computer anxiety Computer simulation Computer support Computer use Education Educational psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human behavior Intentions to use technology Mathematical models Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure Students Technology utilization |
title | Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20basic%20study%20skills:%20The%20use%20of%20technology%20for%20success%20in%20college&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Huffman,%20William%20H.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=583-590&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft.coden=CHBEEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671375878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671375878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |