Loading…

Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college

► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technolog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in human behavior 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.583-590
Main Authors: Huffman, William H., Huffman, Ann Hergatt
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3
container_end_page 590
container_issue 2
container_start_page 583
container_title Computers in human behavior
container_volume 28
creator Huffman, William H.
Huffman, Ann Hergatt
description ► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class). Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students ( N = 384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671375878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563211002482</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671375878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxcPiwo6zfoC95SJ46THpdCfdelJZ_4DgZTyHdFKZyWzsaKpbmG-_kRGPwoO6_N6rqkfIH85WnHF5vlvZ7bCqGeerIsaaH2TBOyUqJfv6iCyYalTVSlH_IseIO8ZY2zK5IHfXsE-jo4PBYClOs9tT_BdixAu63gKdEWjydAK7HVNMmz31KVOcrQVEGkZqU4ywgd_kpzcR4eRzLsnz7d_1zX31-HT3cHP1WFkh2VT5uq17MwzctaxR5bbeqFaYFnjHnFR1D75vBiEHwZkTwqve9X4A6YBBJ5UVS3J2yH3N6W0GnPRLQAsxmhHSjJpLxYVqO9UVlB9QmxNiBq9fc3gxea850x-l6Z0upemP0nRRKa14Tj_jDVoTfTajDfhlrGUJb_q6cJcHDsqv7wGyRhtgtOBCBjtpl8I3W_4DMAaAfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671375878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Huffman, William H. ; Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creator><creatorcontrib>Huffman, William H. ; Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creatorcontrib><description>► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class). Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students ( N = 384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHBEEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance tests ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colleges ; Computer anxiety ; Computer simulation ; Computer support ; Computer use ; Education ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human behavior ; Intentions to use technology ; Mathematical models ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure ; Students ; Technology utilization</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.583-590</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26137492$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huffman, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class). Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students ( N = 384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).</description><subject>Acceptance tests</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Computer anxiety</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computer support</subject><subject>Computer use</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Intentions to use technology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxcPiwo6zfoC95SJ46THpdCfdelJZ_4DgZTyHdFKZyWzsaKpbmG-_kRGPwoO6_N6rqkfIH85WnHF5vlvZ7bCqGeerIsaaH2TBOyUqJfv6iCyYalTVSlH_IseIO8ZY2zK5IHfXsE-jo4PBYClOs9tT_BdixAu63gKdEWjydAK7HVNMmz31KVOcrQVEGkZqU4ywgd_kpzcR4eRzLsnz7d_1zX31-HT3cHP1WFkh2VT5uq17MwzctaxR5bbeqFaYFnjHnFR1D75vBiEHwZkTwqve9X4A6YBBJ5UVS3J2yH3N6W0GnPRLQAsxmhHSjJpLxYVqO9UVlB9QmxNiBq9fc3gxea850x-l6Z0upemP0nRRKa14Tj_jDVoTfTajDfhlrGUJb_q6cJcHDsqv7wGyRhtgtOBCBjtpl8I3W_4DMAaAfg</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Huffman, William H.</creator><creator>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</title><author>Huffman, William H. ; Huffman, Ann Hergatt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acceptance tests</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Computer anxiety</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computer support</topic><topic>Computer use</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Intentions to use technology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huffman, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huffman, William H.</au><au>Huffman, Ann Hergatt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>583-590</pages><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><coden>CHBEEQ</coden><abstract>► Goal of study was to examine technology use and student success. ► The Technology Acceptance Model was used as a theoretical framework. ► We compared instructors’ stated needs to students’ use of technology. ► Ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to technology use. ► Technology use was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class). Technology has become a fundamental component of both education and work. Yet regardless of perceived benefits, in many cases students do not use technology effectively. One challenge educators confront is how to motivate students to effectively use the technological mediums provided in their classes. The goal of the current study is twofold: to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine two motivators of behavior, ease of use and perceived need, and to assess how they affect students’ likelihood of effectively using technology. Second, we evaluate how the match between expectations of the use of technology and the actual student use affect actual classroom performance. To test our hypotheses, college students ( N = 384) in introductory psychology classes completed a survey. We also obtained the instructor’s perceptions of the need for technology in their class and students’ final class grades. Results showed that ease of use and perceived need of technology were related to the frequency of computer use and intentions to use technology. Additionally, findings suggested that technology use, specifically technology deemed important by the instructor, was related to academic success (i.e., final grade in class).</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0747-5632
ispartof Computers in human behavior, 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.583-590
issn 0747-5632
1873-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671375878
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Acceptance tests
Biological and medical sciences
Colleges
Computer anxiety
Computer simulation
Computer support
Computer use
Education
Educational psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human behavior
Intentions to use technology
Mathematical models
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure
Students
Technology utilization
title Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20basic%20study%20skills:%20The%20use%20of%20technology%20for%20success%20in%20college&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Huffman,%20William%20H.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=583-590&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft.coden=CHBEEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671375878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f2529abb1d50477699a753a5e180d6729ef94b36b310d33f79d9fbe6de0e867c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671375878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true