Loading…
Classical and Bayesian Seismic Yield Estimation: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Tests
-- The nuclear tests in May, 1998, in India and Pakistan have stimulated a renewed interest in yield estimation, based on limited data from uncalibrated test sites. We study here the problem of estimating yields using classical and Bayesian methods developed by Shumway (1992), utilizing calibration...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pure and applied geophysics 2001-10, Vol.158 (11), p.2275-2290 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-f537b910b235768c34cd2685f118bf2299fb00a873e9b2b551476e685a91c10a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 2290 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2275 |
container_title | Pure and applied geophysics |
container_volume | 158 |
creator | Shumway, R H |
description | -- The nuclear tests in May, 1998, in India and Pakistan have stimulated a renewed interest in yield estimation, based on limited data from uncalibrated test sites. We study here the problem of estimating yields using classical and Bayesian methods developed by Shumway (1992), utilizing calibration data from the Semipalatinsk test site and measured magnitudes for the 1998 Indian and Pakistani tests given by Murphy (1998). Calibration is done using multivariate classical or Bayesian linear regression, depending on the availability of measured magnitude-yield data and prior information. Confidence intervals for the classical approach are derived applying an extension of Fieller's method suggested by Brown (1982). In the case where prior information is available, the posterior predictive magnitude densities are inverted to give posterior intervals for yield. Intervals obtained using the joint distribution of magnitudes are comparable to the single-magnitude estimates produced by Murphy (1998) and reinforce the conclusion that the announced yields of the Indian and Pakistani tests were too high.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/PL00001149 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671403641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671403641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-f537b910b235768c34cd2685f118bf2299fb00a873e9b2b551476e685a91c10a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzj1PwzAQBmALgUQpLPwCi4kl4PNnzAZVgUqRqEQYmKpL4giX1IFeOvTfkwombnmX5-49xi5B3IAQ7nZZiHEAtD9iE9BSZB6UPWYTIZTKtDHqlJ0RrUfjnPETVs46JIo1dhxTwx9wHyhi4q8h0ibW_D2GruFzGuIGh9inO15-BA7e53yRmoM8rC3xM9KAKfIy0EDn7KTFjsLFX07Z2-O8nD1nxcvTYnZfZCi1HrLWKFd5EJVUxtm8VrpupM1NC5BXrZTet5UQmDsVfCUrY0A7G0aAHmoQqKbs-vfu17b_3o3Nq02kOnQdptDvaAXWgRbKahjp1T-67nfbNH638tIa6Y3S6gdh1Vwr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926529534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classical and Bayesian Seismic Yield Estimation: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Tests</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Shumway, R H</creator><creatorcontrib>Shumway, R H</creatorcontrib><description>-- The nuclear tests in May, 1998, in India and Pakistan have stimulated a renewed interest in yield estimation, based on limited data from uncalibrated test sites. We study here the problem of estimating yields using classical and Bayesian methods developed by Shumway (1992), utilizing calibration data from the Semipalatinsk test site and measured magnitudes for the 1998 Indian and Pakistani tests given by Murphy (1998). Calibration is done using multivariate classical or Bayesian linear regression, depending on the availability of measured magnitude-yield data and prior information. Confidence intervals for the classical approach are derived applying an extension of Fieller's method suggested by Brown (1982). In the case where prior information is available, the posterior predictive magnitude densities are inverted to give posterior intervals for yield. Intervals obtained using the joint distribution of magnitudes are comparable to the single-magnitude estimates produced by Murphy (1998) and reinforce the conclusion that the announced yields of the Indian and Pakistani tests were too high.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/PL00001149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Availability ; Bayesian analysis ; Calibration ; Confidence intervals ; Density ; Geophysics ; Indian ; Intervals ; Nuclear tests ; Regression ; Seismology</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied geophysics, 2001-10, Vol.158 (11), p.2275-2290</ispartof><rights>Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-f537b910b235768c34cd2685f118bf2299fb00a873e9b2b551476e685a91c10a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shumway, R H</creatorcontrib><title>Classical and Bayesian Seismic Yield Estimation: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Tests</title><title>Pure and applied geophysics</title><description>-- The nuclear tests in May, 1998, in India and Pakistan have stimulated a renewed interest in yield estimation, based on limited data from uncalibrated test sites. We study here the problem of estimating yields using classical and Bayesian methods developed by Shumway (1992), utilizing calibration data from the Semipalatinsk test site and measured magnitudes for the 1998 Indian and Pakistani tests given by Murphy (1998). Calibration is done using multivariate classical or Bayesian linear regression, depending on the availability of measured magnitude-yield data and prior information. Confidence intervals for the classical approach are derived applying an extension of Fieller's method suggested by Brown (1982). In the case where prior information is available, the posterior predictive magnitude densities are inverted to give posterior intervals for yield. Intervals obtained using the joint distribution of magnitudes are comparable to the single-magnitude estimates produced by Murphy (1998) and reinforce the conclusion that the announced yields of the Indian and Pakistani tests were too high.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Indian</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Nuclear tests</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdzj1PwzAQBmALgUQpLPwCi4kl4PNnzAZVgUqRqEQYmKpL4giX1IFeOvTfkwombnmX5-49xi5B3IAQ7nZZiHEAtD9iE9BSZB6UPWYTIZTKtDHqlJ0RrUfjnPETVs46JIo1dhxTwx9wHyhi4q8h0ibW_D2GruFzGuIGh9inO15-BA7e53yRmoM8rC3xM9KAKfIy0EDn7KTFjsLFX07Z2-O8nD1nxcvTYnZfZCi1HrLWKFd5EJVUxtm8VrpupM1NC5BXrZTet5UQmDsVfCUrY0A7G0aAHmoQqKbs-vfu17b_3o3Nq02kOnQdptDvaAXWgRbKahjp1T-67nfbNH638tIa6Y3S6gdh1Vwr</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Shumway, R H</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Classical and Bayesian Seismic Yield Estimation: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Tests</title><author>Shumway, R H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-f537b910b235768c34cd2685f118bf2299fb00a873e9b2b551476e685a91c10a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Indian</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Nuclear tests</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shumway, R H</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shumway, R H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classical and Bayesian Seismic Yield Estimation: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Tests</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2275</spage><epage>2290</epage><pages>2275-2290</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>-- The nuclear tests in May, 1998, in India and Pakistan have stimulated a renewed interest in yield estimation, based on limited data from uncalibrated test sites. We study here the problem of estimating yields using classical and Bayesian methods developed by Shumway (1992), utilizing calibration data from the Semipalatinsk test site and measured magnitudes for the 1998 Indian and Pakistani tests given by Murphy (1998). Calibration is done using multivariate classical or Bayesian linear regression, depending on the availability of measured magnitude-yield data and prior information. Confidence intervals for the classical approach are derived applying an extension of Fieller's method suggested by Brown (1982). In the case where prior information is available, the posterior predictive magnitude densities are inverted to give posterior intervals for yield. Intervals obtained using the joint distribution of magnitudes are comparable to the single-magnitude estimates produced by Murphy (1998) and reinforce the conclusion that the announced yields of the Indian and Pakistani tests were too high.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/PL00001149</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-4553 |
ispartof | Pure and applied geophysics, 2001-10, Vol.158 (11), p.2275-2290 |
issn | 0033-4553 1420-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671403641 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Availability Bayesian analysis Calibration Confidence intervals Density Geophysics Indian Intervals Nuclear tests Regression Seismology |
title | Classical and Bayesian Seismic Yield Estimation: The 1998 Indian and Pakistani Tests |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A07%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classical%20and%20Bayesian%20Seismic%20Yield%20Estimation:%20The%201998%20Indian%20and%20Pakistani%20Tests&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20geophysics&rft.au=Shumway,%20R%20H&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2275&rft.epage=2290&rft.pages=2275-2290&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/PL00001149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1671403641%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a244t-f537b910b235768c34cd2685f118bf2299fb00a873e9b2b551476e685a91c10a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926529534&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |