Loading…
A mixture of experts for classifying sleep apneas
► We develop a model for classifying sleep apneas as obstructive, central or mixed. ► The thoracic effort signal transformed by discrete wavelet decomposition is used. ► The model is based on error correcting output code and a mixture of neural networks. ► We determine the borderline between an obst...
Saved in:
Published in: | Expert systems with applications 2012-06, Vol.39 (8), p.7084-7092 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► We develop a model for classifying sleep apneas as obstructive, central or mixed. ► The thoracic effort signal transformed by discrete wavelet decomposition is used. ► The model is based on error correcting output code and a mixture of neural networks. ► We determine the borderline between an obstructive and central part of a mixed apnea. ► Classification accuracy was 90.27% (94.62% obstructive, 95.47% central, 90.45% mixed).
This paper presents a novel approach for classifying sleep apneas into one of the three basic types: obstructive, central and mixed. The goal is to overcome the problems encountered in previous work and improve classification accuracy. The proposed model uses a new classification approach based on the characteristics that each type of apnea presents in different segments of the signal. The model is based on the error correcting output code and it is formed by a combination of artificial neural networks experts where their inputs are the coefficients obtained by a discrete wavelet decomposition applied to the raw samples of the apnea in the thoracic effort signal. The input coefficients received for each network were determined by a feature selection method (support vector machine recursive feature elimination). In order to train and test the systems, 120 events from six different patients were used. The true error rate was estimated using a 10-fold cross validation. The results presented in this work were averaged over 10 different simulations and a multiple comparison procedure was used for model selection. The mean test accuracy obtained was 90.27%±0.79, and the values for each class apnea were 94.62% (obstructive), 95.47% (central) and 90.45% (mixed). Up to the authors’ knowledge, the proposed classifier surpasses all previous results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0957-4174 1873-6793 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.037 |