Loading…

Development of a new indicator of pollutant loads and its application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed

Pollutant load reductions are often required to restore aquatic ecosystems experiencing eutrophication. Loads can be estimated using watershed models or data from monitoring stations, however data availability can limit the timeliness or comprehensiveness of the load estimates. We developed an appro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:River research and applications 2011-02, Vol.27 (2), p.202-212
Main Authors: Keller, Troy A, Shenk, Gary W, Williams, Michael R, Batiuk, Richard A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 202
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 27
creator Keller, Troy A
Shenk, Gary W
Williams, Michael R
Batiuk, Richard A
description Pollutant load reductions are often required to restore aquatic ecosystems experiencing eutrophication. Loads can be estimated using watershed models or data from monitoring stations, however data availability can limit the timeliness or comprehensiveness of the load estimates. We developed an approach to address this challenge that used watershed model results to estimate the proportion of annual nonpoint source nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sediment (Sed) loads derived from unmonitored catchments. This proportion was multiplied by the nonpoint portion of United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimated annual river loads to account for annual variation in hydrologic conditions. Total loads were calculated as the sum of measured river loads, reported point sources from unmonitored areas and the estimated nonpoint source loads from unmonitored catchments. We applied this approach to the Chesapeake Bay because of its socio-economic and ecological importance. Median watershed loads for N, P and Sed were 140, 6.4 and 3030 Mg year⁻¹, respectively (1990-2004). Nonpoint source loads from the monitored areas constituted the greatest source of N, P and Sed (55, 47 and 74% respectively) to the Bay. The high N, P and Sed yield rates (7.3, 0.38 and 99 kg ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively) from nonpoint loads originating from unmonitored areas near the Bay resulted in 25, 32 and 26% (N, P and Sed, respectively) of the Bay's total loads (excluding direct atmospheric deposition, shoreline erosion and oceanic inputs). Disproportionately high loads of P and Seds were associated with years that experienced elevated discharge whereas N loads were directly related to discharge. Error estimates indicated that our methods were most reliable for N (±6%) but reasonable for P (±22%) and provide an effective technique for the timely estimation of pollutant loads from watersheds with unmonitored catchments. Management strategies that decrease N deposition and reduce runoff to control P and Sed transport will effectively reduce pollutant loads. Published in 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.1351
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671440007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017977279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0F1rFDEUBuBBFKxV8B-YG8GbqfmYJJPLuta2UCzULYI34UzmxB2bnYzJbNf9951hl_VKvDoheXjJeYviLaNnjFL-MSU4Y0KyZ8UJk0KWrFL6-fEszcviVc6_KGW6NvVJgZ_xEUMc1tiPJHoCpMct6fq2czDGNF8NMYTNCNN7iNBmAn1LunGawxBm1cWejJGMKySLFWYYEB6QfIId2cKIKa-wfV288BAyvjnM0-L-y8VycVXe3F5eL85vSldxwUpvlHeC6oY6bBRoJV3NwDemQmiainoJTtQeqFGV50rRltec1bLRklaSt-K0-LDPHVL8vcE82nWXHYYAPcZNtkxpVlWUUv1_OjVktOba_KUuxZwTejukbg1pNyE7l26n0u1c-kTfH1IhOwg-Qe-6fPRc1EJVsp5cuXfbLuDun3n27u78kHvwXR7xz9FDerBKCy3t96-Xli-NXPIfys7bvdt7D9HCzzT94f4bp0xQZoSRmokn0uGnsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017977279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a new indicator of pollutant loads and its application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Keller, Troy A ; Shenk, Gary W ; Williams, Michael R ; Batiuk, Richard A</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, Troy A ; Shenk, Gary W ; Williams, Michael R ; Batiuk, Richard A</creatorcontrib><description>Pollutant load reductions are often required to restore aquatic ecosystems experiencing eutrophication. Loads can be estimated using watershed models or data from monitoring stations, however data availability can limit the timeliness or comprehensiveness of the load estimates. We developed an approach to address this challenge that used watershed model results to estimate the proportion of annual nonpoint source nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sediment (Sed) loads derived from unmonitored catchments. This proportion was multiplied by the nonpoint portion of United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimated annual river loads to account for annual variation in hydrologic conditions. Total loads were calculated as the sum of measured river loads, reported point sources from unmonitored areas and the estimated nonpoint source loads from unmonitored catchments. We applied this approach to the Chesapeake Bay because of its socio-economic and ecological importance. Median watershed loads for N, P and Sed were 140, 6.4 and 3030 Mg year⁻¹, respectively (1990-2004). Nonpoint source loads from the monitored areas constituted the greatest source of N, P and Sed (55, 47 and 74% respectively) to the Bay. The high N, P and Sed yield rates (7.3, 0.38 and 99 kg ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively) from nonpoint loads originating from unmonitored areas near the Bay resulted in 25, 32 and 26% (N, P and Sed, respectively) of the Bay's total loads (excluding direct atmospheric deposition, shoreline erosion and oceanic inputs). Disproportionately high loads of P and Seds were associated with years that experienced elevated discharge whereas N loads were directly related to discharge. Error estimates indicated that our methods were most reliable for N (±6%) but reasonable for P (±22%) and provide an effective technique for the timely estimation of pollutant loads from watersheds with unmonitored catchments. Management strategies that decrease N deposition and reduce runoff to control P and Sed transport will effectively reduce pollutant loads. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.1351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catchments ; Deposition ; Discharge ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Estimates ; estuary ; fluvial transport ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; indicator ; large rivers ; Nonpoint sources ; nutrient management ; Pollutants ; restoration ; Rivers ; Synecology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2011-02, Vol.27 (2), p.202-212</ispartof><rights>This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23836458$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, Troy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenk, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batiuk, Richard A</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a new indicator of pollutant loads and its application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed</title><title>River research and applications</title><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><description>Pollutant load reductions are often required to restore aquatic ecosystems experiencing eutrophication. Loads can be estimated using watershed models or data from monitoring stations, however data availability can limit the timeliness or comprehensiveness of the load estimates. We developed an approach to address this challenge that used watershed model results to estimate the proportion of annual nonpoint source nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sediment (Sed) loads derived from unmonitored catchments. This proportion was multiplied by the nonpoint portion of United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimated annual river loads to account for annual variation in hydrologic conditions. Total loads were calculated as the sum of measured river loads, reported point sources from unmonitored areas and the estimated nonpoint source loads from unmonitored catchments. We applied this approach to the Chesapeake Bay because of its socio-economic and ecological importance. Median watershed loads for N, P and Sed were 140, 6.4 and 3030 Mg year⁻¹, respectively (1990-2004). Nonpoint source loads from the monitored areas constituted the greatest source of N, P and Sed (55, 47 and 74% respectively) to the Bay. The high N, P and Sed yield rates (7.3, 0.38 and 99 kg ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively) from nonpoint loads originating from unmonitored areas near the Bay resulted in 25, 32 and 26% (N, P and Sed, respectively) of the Bay's total loads (excluding direct atmospheric deposition, shoreline erosion and oceanic inputs). Disproportionately high loads of P and Seds were associated with years that experienced elevated discharge whereas N loads were directly related to discharge. Error estimates indicated that our methods were most reliable for N (±6%) but reasonable for P (±22%) and provide an effective technique for the timely estimation of pollutant loads from watersheds with unmonitored catchments. Management strategies that decrease N deposition and reduce runoff to control P and Sed transport will effectively reduce pollutant loads. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>estuary</subject><subject>fluvial transport</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>indicator</subject><subject>large rivers</subject><subject>Nonpoint sources</subject><subject>nutrient management</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0F1rFDEUBuBBFKxV8B-YG8GbqfmYJJPLuta2UCzULYI34UzmxB2bnYzJbNf9951hl_VKvDoheXjJeYviLaNnjFL-MSU4Y0KyZ8UJk0KWrFL6-fEszcviVc6_KGW6NvVJgZ_xEUMc1tiPJHoCpMct6fq2czDGNF8NMYTNCNN7iNBmAn1LunGawxBm1cWejJGMKySLFWYYEB6QfIId2cKIKa-wfV288BAyvjnM0-L-y8VycVXe3F5eL85vSldxwUpvlHeC6oY6bBRoJV3NwDemQmiainoJTtQeqFGV50rRltec1bLRklaSt-K0-LDPHVL8vcE82nWXHYYAPcZNtkxpVlWUUv1_OjVktOba_KUuxZwTejukbg1pNyE7l26n0u1c-kTfH1IhOwg-Qe-6fPRc1EJVsp5cuXfbLuDun3n27u78kHvwXR7xz9FDerBKCy3t96-Xli-NXPIfys7bvdt7D9HCzzT94f4bp0xQZoSRmokn0uGnsQ</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Keller, Troy A</creator><creator>Shenk, Gary W</creator><creator>Williams, Michael R</creator><creator>Batiuk, Richard A</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Development of a new indicator of pollutant loads and its application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed</title><author>Keller, Troy A ; Shenk, Gary W ; Williams, Michael R ; Batiuk, Richard A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>estuary</topic><topic>fluvial transport</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>indicator</topic><topic>large rivers</topic><topic>Nonpoint sources</topic><topic>nutrient management</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, Troy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenk, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batiuk, Richard A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, Troy A</au><au>Shenk, Gary W</au><au>Williams, Michael R</au><au>Batiuk, Richard A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a new indicator of pollutant loads and its application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>202-212</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Pollutant load reductions are often required to restore aquatic ecosystems experiencing eutrophication. Loads can be estimated using watershed models or data from monitoring stations, however data availability can limit the timeliness or comprehensiveness of the load estimates. We developed an approach to address this challenge that used watershed model results to estimate the proportion of annual nonpoint source nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sediment (Sed) loads derived from unmonitored catchments. This proportion was multiplied by the nonpoint portion of United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimated annual river loads to account for annual variation in hydrologic conditions. Total loads were calculated as the sum of measured river loads, reported point sources from unmonitored areas and the estimated nonpoint source loads from unmonitored catchments. We applied this approach to the Chesapeake Bay because of its socio-economic and ecological importance. Median watershed loads for N, P and Sed were 140, 6.4 and 3030 Mg year⁻¹, respectively (1990-2004). Nonpoint source loads from the monitored areas constituted the greatest source of N, P and Sed (55, 47 and 74% respectively) to the Bay. The high N, P and Sed yield rates (7.3, 0.38 and 99 kg ha⁻¹ year⁻¹, respectively) from nonpoint loads originating from unmonitored areas near the Bay resulted in 25, 32 and 26% (N, P and Sed, respectively) of the Bay's total loads (excluding direct atmospheric deposition, shoreline erosion and oceanic inputs). Disproportionately high loads of P and Seds were associated with years that experienced elevated discharge whereas N loads were directly related to discharge. Error estimates indicated that our methods were most reliable for N (±6%) but reasonable for P (±22%) and provide an effective technique for the timely estimation of pollutant loads from watersheds with unmonitored catchments. Management strategies that decrease N deposition and reduce runoff to control P and Sed transport will effectively reduce pollutant loads. Published in 2010 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.1351</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2011-02, Vol.27 (2), p.202-212
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671440007
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Catchments
Deposition
Discharge
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Estimates
estuary
fluvial transport
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
indicator
large rivers
Nonpoint sources
nutrient management
Pollutants
restoration
Rivers
Synecology
Watersheds
title Development of a new indicator of pollutant loads and its application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A49%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20new%20indicator%20of%20pollutant%20loads%20and%20its%20application%20to%20the%20Chesapeake%20Bay%20watershed&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Keller,%20Troy%20A&rft.date=2011-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=202-212&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.1351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017977279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4231-f96fc307b0ceb6a765c81afb94eabb40f5ac38fa0964f2660d282185b750452d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017977279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true