Loading…

Optimal power flow solutions through multi-objective programming

Despite the progress achieved in the development of optimal power flow (OPF) programs, most of the solution techniques reported in the literature suffer from the difficulty of dealing with objective functions of different natures at the same time. However, the need for alternative power network solu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy (Oxford) 2012-06, Vol.42 (1), p.35-45
Main Authors: Salgado, R.S., Rangel, E.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 42
creator Salgado, R.S.
Rangel, E.L.
description Despite the progress achieved in the development of optimal power flow (OPF) programs, most of the solution techniques reported in the literature suffer from the difficulty of dealing with objective functions of different natures at the same time. However, the need for alternative power network solutions during the planning of a power system operation requires the optimization of several performance indexes simultaneously. In this study, attention is focused on the modelling and solution of a parameterized multi-objective OPF problem. The proposed OPF model combines two classical multi-objective optimization approaches, the weighted sum and the constraint methods, through a parameterization scheme to manipulate the objective functions. This parameterization allows relaxation of the constraints imposed to handle the performance indexes, to facilitate the convergence of the iterative process. The resulting optimization problem, which ultimately is a mono-objective optimization problem, is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. The IEEE 24-bus test system was used to obtain the numerical results of the computational simulation. ► The optimal power flow problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. ► The weighting and the constraint methods of multi-objective programming are combined through a scheme of parameterization. ► The resulting OPF problem is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. ► This strategy allows to deal with objective functions of different nature, with flexible additional constraints, as desirable in the operation planning of the power system. ► Numerical results obtained with the IEEE 24-bus test system is used to illustrate the main features of the proposed approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671447644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544211007584</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671447644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx3tQcE7_A8FeBC-tSZqm6UWU4S8Y7KA7hzR97TLapibtxv57Mzo8Kjx4l8_3-x6fILjBKMYIs4dtDB3Y-hAThHHsBxF-FsxQwlCUUkougkvntgihlOf5LHha9YNuZRP2Zg82rBqzD51pxkGbzoXDxpqx3oTt2Aw6MsUW1KB3EPbW1Fa2re7qq-C8ko2D69OeB-vXl6_Fe7RcvX0snpeRooQNkSSM0qKkkhcsqyAtAOUJrQByTouMp6BSILLIcpZWmKuyTLIyY5QgxFjpg8k8uJ96_e3vEdwgWu0UNI3swIxOYJZhSn2E_o-ihBPKOSIepROqrHHOQiV663XYg4fE0afYismnOPoUfrxPH7s7XZBOyaayslPa_WZJmmPC8JG7nbhKGiFr65n1py9i3n-GGMKeeJwI8O52GqxwSkOnoNTWyxal0X-_8gM1k5jt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038248802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal power flow solutions through multi-objective programming</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Salgado, R.S. ; Rangel, E.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salgado, R.S. ; Rangel, E.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the progress achieved in the development of optimal power flow (OPF) programs, most of the solution techniques reported in the literature suffer from the difficulty of dealing with objective functions of different natures at the same time. However, the need for alternative power network solutions during the planning of a power system operation requires the optimization of several performance indexes simultaneously. In this study, attention is focused on the modelling and solution of a parameterized multi-objective OPF problem. The proposed OPF model combines two classical multi-objective optimization approaches, the weighted sum and the constraint methods, through a parameterization scheme to manipulate the objective functions. This parameterization allows relaxation of the constraints imposed to handle the performance indexes, to facilitate the convergence of the iterative process. The resulting optimization problem, which ultimately is a mono-objective optimization problem, is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. The IEEE 24-bus test system was used to obtain the numerical results of the computational simulation. ► The optimal power flow problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. ► The weighting and the constraint methods of multi-objective programming are combined through a scheme of parameterization. ► The resulting OPF problem is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. ► This strategy allows to deal with objective functions of different nature, with flexible additional constraints, as desirable in the operation planning of the power system. ► Numerical results obtained with the IEEE 24-bus test system is used to illustrate the main features of the proposed approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.028</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENEYDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Convergence ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Interior point methods ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Multi-objective ; Optimal power flow ; Optimization ; Parametrization ; planning ; Power flow ; Programming ; system optimization</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2012-06, Vol.42 (1), p.35-45</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25912618$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salgado, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangel, E.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal power flow solutions through multi-objective programming</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Despite the progress achieved in the development of optimal power flow (OPF) programs, most of the solution techniques reported in the literature suffer from the difficulty of dealing with objective functions of different natures at the same time. However, the need for alternative power network solutions during the planning of a power system operation requires the optimization of several performance indexes simultaneously. In this study, attention is focused on the modelling and solution of a parameterized multi-objective OPF problem. The proposed OPF model combines two classical multi-objective optimization approaches, the weighted sum and the constraint methods, through a parameterization scheme to manipulate the objective functions. This parameterization allows relaxation of the constraints imposed to handle the performance indexes, to facilitate the convergence of the iterative process. The resulting optimization problem, which ultimately is a mono-objective optimization problem, is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. The IEEE 24-bus test system was used to obtain the numerical results of the computational simulation. ► The optimal power flow problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. ► The weighting and the constraint methods of multi-objective programming are combined through a scheme of parameterization. ► The resulting OPF problem is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. ► This strategy allows to deal with objective functions of different nature, with flexible additional constraints, as desirable in the operation planning of the power system. ► Numerical results obtained with the IEEE 24-bus test system is used to illustrate the main features of the proposed approach.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Interior point methods</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multi-objective</subject><subject>Optimal power flow</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parametrization</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Power flow</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>system optimization</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx3tQcE7_A8FeBC-tSZqm6UWU4S8Y7KA7hzR97TLapibtxv57Mzo8Kjx4l8_3-x6fILjBKMYIs4dtDB3Y-hAThHHsBxF-FsxQwlCUUkougkvntgihlOf5LHha9YNuZRP2Zg82rBqzD51pxkGbzoXDxpqx3oTt2Aw6MsUW1KB3EPbW1Fa2re7qq-C8ko2D69OeB-vXl6_Fe7RcvX0snpeRooQNkSSM0qKkkhcsqyAtAOUJrQByTouMp6BSILLIcpZWmKuyTLIyY5QgxFjpg8k8uJ96_e3vEdwgWu0UNI3swIxOYJZhSn2E_o-ihBPKOSIepROqrHHOQiV663XYg4fE0afYismnOPoUfrxPH7s7XZBOyaayslPa_WZJmmPC8JG7nbhKGiFr65n1py9i3n-GGMKeeJwI8O52GqxwSkOnoNTWyxal0X-_8gM1k5jt</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Salgado, R.S.</creator><creator>Rangel, E.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Optimal power flow solutions through multi-objective programming</title><author>Salgado, R.S. ; Rangel, E.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Interior point methods</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multi-objective</topic><topic>Optimal power flow</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parametrization</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Power flow</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>system optimization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salgado, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangel, E.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salgado, R.S.</au><au>Rangel, E.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal power flow solutions through multi-objective programming</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>35-45</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><coden>ENEYDS</coden><abstract>Despite the progress achieved in the development of optimal power flow (OPF) programs, most of the solution techniques reported in the literature suffer from the difficulty of dealing with objective functions of different natures at the same time. However, the need for alternative power network solutions during the planning of a power system operation requires the optimization of several performance indexes simultaneously. In this study, attention is focused on the modelling and solution of a parameterized multi-objective OPF problem. The proposed OPF model combines two classical multi-objective optimization approaches, the weighted sum and the constraint methods, through a parameterization scheme to manipulate the objective functions. This parameterization allows relaxation of the constraints imposed to handle the performance indexes, to facilitate the convergence of the iterative process. The resulting optimization problem, which ultimately is a mono-objective optimization problem, is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. The IEEE 24-bus test system was used to obtain the numerical results of the computational simulation. ► The optimal power flow problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. ► The weighting and the constraint methods of multi-objective programming are combined through a scheme of parameterization. ► The resulting OPF problem is solved through the nonlinear version of the predictor–corrector interior point method. ► This strategy allows to deal with objective functions of different nature, with flexible additional constraints, as desirable in the operation planning of the power system. ► Numerical results obtained with the IEEE 24-bus test system is used to illustrate the main features of the proposed approach.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.028</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2012-06, Vol.42 (1), p.35-45
issn 0360-5442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671447644
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Applied sciences
Convergence
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Interior point methods
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Multi-objective
Optimal power flow
Optimization
Parametrization
planning
Power flow
Programming
system optimization
title Optimal power flow solutions through multi-objective programming
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20power%20flow%20solutions%20through%20multi-objective%20programming&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Salgado,%20R.S.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=35-45&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.coden=ENEYDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671447644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a2644bd4a8b67fe5be0934fee984b785ec5e2ab7965f18cdd37d76420066d4bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038248802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true