Validation of an ANN Flow Prediction Model Using a Multistation Cluster Analysis

The objective of this study is to validate a flow prediction model for a hydrometric station using a multistation criterion in addition to standard single-station performance criteria. In this contribution we used cluster analysis to identify the regional flow height, i.e., water-level patterns and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrologic engineering 2012-02, Vol.17 (2), p.262-271
Main Authors: Demirel, Mehmet C, Booij, Martijn J, Kahya, Ercan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cluster analysis
Criteria
Freshwater
Hydrology
Lead time
Learning theory
Mathematical models
Neural networks
Precipitation
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this study is to validate a flow prediction model for a hydrometric station using a multistation criterion in addition to standard single-station performance criteria. In this contribution we used cluster analysis to identify the regional flow height, i.e., water-level patterns and validate the output of an artificial neural network (ANN) model of the Alportel River in Portugal. Measurements of precipitation, temperature, and flow height were used as input variables to the ANN model with a lead time of 12 h. The lead time of 12 h is assumed to be appropriate for a short-term hydrological prediction since it is meaningful for physical processes. The ANN model with three inputs, four hidden neurons, and ten epochs was tested using the new model-validation criterion. The high performance of the model (i.e., Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient is equal to 0.922) was confirmed by the cluster-analysis criterion. It can be concluded that a multistation-based approach can be used as an additional validation criterion and might result in a rejection of a model which initially passed a single-station validation criterion.
ISSN:1084-0699
1943-5584
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000426