Loading…
Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China
This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effec...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cleaner production 2014-02, Vol.64, p.63-72 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3 |
container_end_page | 72 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Journal of cleaner production |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Lin, H. Zeng, S.X. Ma, H.Y. Qi, G.Y. Tam, Vivian W.Y. |
description | This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671568557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652613005076</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671568557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEURYMo2I7zEwZqI7ip8iWVz9UgjTOjNLjRdUgnL5qmOimTmgb_vdV043ZWd3Puu7xDyB2FgQKVnw7DwU841zIwoOMAagAuX5EN1cr0VGn5mmzACNNLweRb8q61AwBVoPiGfNu63M1lSkvybuq8m9OyZqjphJ0vdS7VLdj9qoi5SzmXk1tSyffdDlsruXWxlmO3_Z2ye0_eRDc1vL3mDfn58OXH9qnffX_8uv286z0HsfTaBRmYMgDeQBgNj0LvjTKeOx4ND_u9wMh0UCpELYKInDKt9yBGycMY_HhDPl7urh__eca22GNqHqfJZSzPzVKpqJBaCPUyKgCU0MywFRUX1NfSWsVo55qOrv61FOxZsz3Yq2Z71mxB2VXz2vtwnXBtNRiryz61_2WmR6aBnbn7C4ermlPCaptPmD2GVNEvNpT0wtI_hhCVig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500758292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Lin, H. ; Zeng, S.X. ; Ma, H.Y. ; Qi, G.Y. ; Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, H. ; Zeng, S.X. ; Ma, H.Y. ; Qi, G.Y. ; Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; China ; Cleaning ; Competition ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Consumers ; Environment and sustainable development ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Green innovation ; Political capital ; Political factors ; Pollution ; Process innovation ; Product innovation ; Regulations ; Stakeholders ; Suppliers</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2014-02, Vol.64, p.63-72</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28328026$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, S.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, G.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Environment and sustainable development</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Green innovation</subject><subject>Political capital</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Process innovation</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEURYMo2I7zEwZqI7ip8iWVz9UgjTOjNLjRdUgnL5qmOimTmgb_vdV043ZWd3Puu7xDyB2FgQKVnw7DwU841zIwoOMAagAuX5EN1cr0VGn5mmzACNNLweRb8q61AwBVoPiGfNu63M1lSkvybuq8m9OyZqjphJ0vdS7VLdj9qoi5SzmXk1tSyffdDlsruXWxlmO3_Z2ye0_eRDc1vL3mDfn58OXH9qnffX_8uv286z0HsfTaBRmYMgDeQBgNj0LvjTKeOx4ND_u9wMh0UCpELYKInDKt9yBGycMY_HhDPl7urh__eca22GNqHqfJZSzPzVKpqJBaCPUyKgCU0MywFRUX1NfSWsVo55qOrv61FOxZsz3Yq2Z71mxB2VXz2vtwnXBtNRiryz61_2WmR6aBnbn7C4ermlPCaptPmD2GVNEvNpT0wtI_hhCVig</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Lin, H.</creator><creator>Zeng, S.X.</creator><creator>Ma, H.Y.</creator><creator>Qi, G.Y.</creator><creator>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</title><author>Lin, H. ; Zeng, S.X. ; Ma, H.Y. ; Qi, G.Y. ; Tam, Vivian W.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Environment and sustainable development</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Green innovation</topic><topic>Political capital</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Process innovation</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, S.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, G.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, H.</au><au>Zeng, S.X.</au><au>Ma, H.Y.</au><au>Qi, G.Y.</au><au>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>63</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>63-72</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-6526 |
ispartof | Journal of cleaner production, 2014-02, Vol.64, p.63-72 |
issn | 0959-6526 1879-1786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671568557 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences China Cleaning Competition Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Consumers Environment and sustainable development Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Green innovation Political capital Political factors Pollution Process innovation Product innovation Regulations Stakeholders Suppliers |
title | Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20political%20capital%20drive%20corporate%20green%20innovation?%20Lessons%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Lin,%20H.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=63-72&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671568557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500758292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |