Loading…

Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China

This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cleaner production 2014-02, Vol.64, p.63-72
Main Authors: Lin, H., Zeng, S.X., Ma, H.Y., Qi, G.Y., Tam, Vivian W.Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3
container_end_page 72
container_issue
container_start_page 63
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 64
creator Lin, H.
Zeng, S.X.
Ma, H.Y.
Qi, G.Y.
Tam, Vivian W.Y.
description This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671568557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652613005076</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671568557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEURYMo2I7zEwZqI7ip8iWVz9UgjTOjNLjRdUgnL5qmOimTmgb_vdV043ZWd3Puu7xDyB2FgQKVnw7DwU841zIwoOMAagAuX5EN1cr0VGn5mmzACNNLweRb8q61AwBVoPiGfNu63M1lSkvybuq8m9OyZqjphJ0vdS7VLdj9qoi5SzmXk1tSyffdDlsruXWxlmO3_Z2ye0_eRDc1vL3mDfn58OXH9qnffX_8uv286z0HsfTaBRmYMgDeQBgNj0LvjTKeOx4ND_u9wMh0UCpELYKInDKt9yBGycMY_HhDPl7urh__eca22GNqHqfJZSzPzVKpqJBaCPUyKgCU0MywFRUX1NfSWsVo55qOrv61FOxZsz3Yq2Z71mxB2VXz2vtwnXBtNRiryz61_2WmR6aBnbn7C4ermlPCaptPmD2GVNEvNpT0wtI_hhCVig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500758292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Lin, H. ; Zeng, S.X. ; Ma, H.Y. ; Qi, G.Y. ; Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, H. ; Zeng, S.X. ; Ma, H.Y. ; Qi, G.Y. ; Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; China ; Cleaning ; Competition ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Consumers ; Environment and sustainable development ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Green innovation ; Political capital ; Political factors ; Pollution ; Process innovation ; Product innovation ; Regulations ; Stakeholders ; Suppliers</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2014-02, Vol.64, p.63-72</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28328026$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, S.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, G.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Environment and sustainable development</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Green innovation</subject><subject>Political capital</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Process innovation</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEURYMo2I7zEwZqI7ip8iWVz9UgjTOjNLjRdUgnL5qmOimTmgb_vdV043ZWd3Puu7xDyB2FgQKVnw7DwU841zIwoOMAagAuX5EN1cr0VGn5mmzACNNLweRb8q61AwBVoPiGfNu63M1lSkvybuq8m9OyZqjphJ0vdS7VLdj9qoi5SzmXk1tSyffdDlsruXWxlmO3_Z2ye0_eRDc1vL3mDfn58OXH9qnffX_8uv286z0HsfTaBRmYMgDeQBgNj0LvjTKeOx4ND_u9wMh0UCpELYKInDKt9yBGycMY_HhDPl7urh__eca22GNqHqfJZSzPzVKpqJBaCPUyKgCU0MywFRUX1NfSWsVo55qOrv61FOxZsz3Yq2Z71mxB2VXz2vtwnXBtNRiryz61_2WmR6aBnbn7C4ermlPCaptPmD2GVNEvNpT0wtI_hhCVig</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Lin, H.</creator><creator>Zeng, S.X.</creator><creator>Ma, H.Y.</creator><creator>Qi, G.Y.</creator><creator>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</title><author>Lin, H. ; Zeng, S.X. ; Ma, H.Y. ; Qi, G.Y. ; Tam, Vivian W.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Environment and sustainable development</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Green innovation</topic><topic>Political capital</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Process innovation</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, S.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, H.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, G.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, H.</au><au>Zeng, S.X.</au><au>Ma, H.Y.</au><au>Qi, G.Y.</au><au>Tam, Vivian W.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>63</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>63-72</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>This article provides empirical evidence on how the pressures of corporate political capital and stakeholders' affect firms' willingness to embrace green innovation. Using a theoretical framework combining the stakeholder theory with the resource-based views (RBV), we investigate the effects of firms' political capital and stakeholders' pressures on corporate green innovation using a survey to 791 private manufacturing firms in China. Our results reveal that: (1) political capital plays a significant but negative role in firms' green product and process innovation performance; (2) both regulations and suppliers positively promote green innovation in product and process; (3) consumers are positively related to green product innovation but negatively related to green process innovation; and (4) competitions do not have any significant effects on both green product and green process innovation. Furthermore, political factors and stakeholders' contingent roles in institutional context should synthetically be considered to initiate green innovation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2014-02, Vol.64, p.63-72
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671568557
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
China
Cleaning
Competition
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Consumers
Environment and sustainable development
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Green innovation
Political capital
Political factors
Pollution
Process innovation
Product innovation
Regulations
Stakeholders
Suppliers
title Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20political%20capital%20drive%20corporate%20green%20innovation?%20Lessons%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Lin,%20H.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=63-72&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671568557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-8ad6d27900c90d394f58b979c4a4f94dbb5ef28d77df85d5f41288b05364d3dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500758292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true