Supercritical extraction of crude oil by methanol- and ethanol-modified carbon dioxide

•Ethanol and methanol additions to dense carbon dioxide were investigated.•Heavier oil fractions are extracted faster in ethanol presence.•Waxy precipitates were found in the samples extracted with ethanol.•Methanol addition contributes to greater extraction of lighter components. The effect of etha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of supercritical fluids 2013-06, Vol.78, p.63-69
Main Authors: Rudyk, Svetlana, Hussain, Shahid, Spirov, Pavel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carbon dioxide
Crude oil
Ethanol
Ethyl alcohol
Extraction
Liquid phases
Methyl alcohol
Oil
Recovery
Supercritical
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Ethanol and methanol additions to dense carbon dioxide were investigated.•Heavier oil fractions are extracted faster in ethanol presence.•Waxy precipitates were found in the samples extracted with ethanol.•Methanol addition contributes to greater extraction of lighter components. The effect of ethanol and methanol cosolvents on the extraction yield and kinetics of crude oil originating from the Halfdan field of the North Sea by supercritical carbon dioxide was investigated across a pressure range of 20–60MPa under a fixed temperature of 60°C. Results inform that the pure carbon dioxide recovery varied between 43 and 77% while the recovery of the liquid phase of oil ranged between 22 and 56% across the entire pressure range. Using ethanol- and methanol-modified CO2, the total recovery yield increased significantly averaging an additional 18.2% and 19.4% respectively when compared to pure carbon dioxide. The ethanol addition improved the recovery of the liquid phase of oil averaging 9.6% while the methanol addition improved it to 7.3% across the entire pressure range. Study of the kinetics of extraction process indicated that heavier fractions were extracted faster with the ethanol- compared to the methanol-modified CO2. GC–MS TIC chromatographic analysis of the extracted oil fractions showed that the extraction of C19-C30 single carbon number groups with the addition of methanol is more dependent on pressure. Predominantly, ethanol addition was more efficient in extraction of C17-C38 single carbon number groups while methanol contributed more in extraction of C7-C9 SCN groups.
ISSN:0896-8446
1872-8162
DOI:10.1016/j.supflu.2013.03.006