Loading…
Implications of paradigm shift in Japan’s electricity security of supply: A multi-dimensional indicator assessment
•Modelled hourly electricity supply/demand balance under different energy mixes in Japan.•Evaluation of electricity security of supply indicators for baseline and alternative generation mixes.•Demonstrated security improvements for high share of renewables and nuclear phase-out.•Structure of supply...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied energy 2014-06, Vol.123, p.424-434 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Modelled hourly electricity supply/demand balance under different energy mixes in Japan.•Evaluation of electricity security of supply indicators for baseline and alternative generation mixes.•Demonstrated security improvements for high share of renewables and nuclear phase-out.•Structure of supply sector might have to dramatically change to guarantee system reliability.
The present study developed a series of indicators to assess the electricity generation security of supply under different energy portfolios in Japan in a post-3/11 context. A baseline and four alternative scenarios were designed assuming different shares of fossil fuel and nuclear thermal power and renewables in a 2030 timeframe. The analysis revealed that expanding endogenous energy resources together with a reduction of nuclear power and fossil fuel technologies appears to be a promising strategy to enhance electricity security of supply. Under this strategy imported fossil fuel dependence would decrease to 69.3%, whereas environmental impacts would decline 15–22%, compared to pre-Fukushima levels (baseline scenario). However, an immediate transition to grid-connected renewable energies is not realistic and would increase stress on the system reliability in the short-term, given infrastructure and technical constraints. Investment should be channelised to develop storage and back-up systems, as well as de-centralisation of supply systems to increase energy system resilience and security of supply. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.024 |